Cybereagles

tfco wrote:

Bigpokey24 wrote:tfco, so una wan spend 40 million on a 29 year one legged overrated serb

Why do you hate these players so much

1. Nemanja Matic
2. N'golo Kante

You know why.

Cito wrote:Mino Raiola hits the jackpot at ManU's expense again. I wonder how much of the 75million for Lukaku is going to him.

Someone need to do some indept dig into accounts of Mourinho as he is probably getting a side cut on all these silly money.

Is this confirmed yet.

...at least Lukaku don't get injured often. With Zlatan gone, they need a big target up front.

benteke wrote:

Cito wrote:Mino Raiola hits the jackpot at ManU's expense again. I wonder how much of the 75million for Lukaku is going to him.

Someone need to do some in depth dig into accounts of Mourinho as he is probably getting a side cut on all these silly money.

Is this confirmed yet.

http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/40516483

Manchester United have agreed a fee of around £75m with Everton for striker Romelu Lukaku, senior club sources have told the BBC.

The 24-year-old Belgium international scored 25 Premier League goals last season.

Cito wrote:

benteke wrote:

Cito wrote:Mino Raiola hits the jackpot at ManU's expense again. I wonder how much of the 75million for Lukaku is going to him.

Someone need to do some in depth dig into accounts of Mourinho as he is probably getting a side cut on all these silly money.

Is this confirmed yet.

http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/40516483

Manchester United have agreed a fee of around £75m with Everton for striker Romelu Lukaku, senior club sources have told the BBC.

The 24-year-old Belgium international scored 25 Premier League goals last season.

There was another communication from Everton denying this. Probably holding out for 100M.

wiseone wrote:Lukaku is a good player but spunking 75 million on him is madness. For that price they could get PEA (who is a better player). Since Jose is in the habit of buying back former players (Matic, Pogba, Zlatan) I am surprised he did not make a move for Keane and Dave Azpilucueta! Seriously though, I think JM likes big "target men" up front (Drogba, Zlatan, Costa) - hence the move for Lukaku.

Cito wrote:Mino Raiola hits the jackpot at ManU's expense again. I wonder how much of the 75million for Lukaku is going to him.

Someone need to do some indept dig into accounts of Mourinho as he is probably getting a side cut on all these silly money.

ManU have been spunking money around for the last couple of seasons like mad mullahs!

lukaku for 75m. will gladly pass

Kai ..lukaku ain't worth 30 million

Bigpokey24 wrote:Kai ..lukaku ain't worth 30 million

I dont rate Lukaku as high as many do, but Lukaku scored more goals than you best striker! that is what you should be laughing at. You are talking about a 24 year old who has consistently been one of the highest goal scorers in the league and has consistently outperformed all YOUR strikers for years.

Your stupid club just paid 35 million pounds for a backyard player, Rudiger. And has bid 60 million pounds for a left back. Arsenal just paid 55 million pounds for Lacazette from France.

When you want to laugh, you should look close to home.

Tomorrow, another person will come and say Harry Kane is not worth 30 million.

tfco wrote:He's no AN1, but he'll do

Never been sold on the Congolese, and he'll need to do more to convince me

Never sold on Lualua ?

With a great midfield behind Lukaku, he should do well.

balo wrote:With a great midfield behind Lukaku, he should do well.

What midfield did he have at WBA and Everton to be only behind Aguero and Kane in goals?

I have lost count of the number of times they have broken the club, British, and world transfer record since SAF retired. They made Rio the most expensive defender in history when they bought him for 29 million in 2002. Only once (Berba in 2008) did they pay that much for a player again in the next 12 years (when they bought Mata in 2014). Man U have broken the club transfer record in every single season since SAF retired: Mata (37 million ion 2014), ADM (60 million ion 2014), Tony Martial (60 million ion 2015), Pogba (90 million in 2016).

No player not called Ronaldo, Messi, Suarez, Bale, PEA, Lewandowski or Neymar should be costing above 60 million.

oloye wrote: ManU have been spunking money around for the last couple of seasons like mad mullahs!

danfo driver wrote:

balo wrote:With a great midfield behind Lukaku, he should do well.

What midfield did he have at WBA and Everton to be only behind Aguero and Kane in goals?

That was for folks not sold on Lukaku. I expect Man U will have better midfield than WBA and Everton. He will do even better at Man U.

Lukaku will do well at united, no doubt

wiseone wrote:I have lost count of the number of times they have broken the club, British, and world transfer record since SAF retired. They made Rio the most expensive defender in history when they bought him for 29 million in 2002. Only once (Berba in 2008) did they pay that much for a player again in the next 12 years (when they bought Mata in 2014). Man U have broken the club transfer record in every single season since SAF retired: Mata (37 million ion 2014), ADM (60 million ion 2014), Tony Martial (60 million ion 2015), Pogba (90 million in 2016).

No player not called Ronaldo, Messi, Suarez, Bale, PEA, Lewandowski or Neymar should be costing above 60 million.

oloye wrote: ManU have been spunking money around for the last couple of seasons like mad mullahs!

Can we ask EFCC to investigate these deals? Definitely 'fishy'

When exactly is Lukaku being confirmed.
Has anything actually been done, any medical or whatever ?
Or is it just an advanced rumour.

benteke wrote:When exactly is Lukaku being confirmed.
Has anything actually been done, any medical or whatever ?
Or is it just an advanced rumour.

The rumor mill is just crazy and toying with peoples' emotions.

Medical today, no medical yet tomorrow.

British radio saying Rooney being dashed to Everton for free? wow

anikulapo wrote:British radio saying Rooney being dashed to Everton for free? wow

Perhaps to sweeten the Lukaku deal. lol

If Becks was 15 years younger (or Lukaku 15 years older), they would have caused mayhem in the same team. Lukaku would prosper with the instant service that Becks provided. Lukaku is not a PEA that gives defenders twisted blood with perpetual motion and clever running. Lukaku wold rather run through you than around you.

Coach wrote: