Video Technology in Use

Where Eagles dare! Discuss Nigerian related football (soccer) topics here.

Moderators: Moderator Team, phpBB2 - Administrators

Post Reply
User avatar
Cito
Eaglet
Eaglet
Posts: 17419
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 6:16 pm
Contact:
Video Technology in Use

Post by Cito »

The friendly between France and Spain saw the use of Video technology. It took about 30 seconds to 1 minute and I think this is a good option to have.
13:09
Hold on.

It has been chalked off.

Christophe Jaillet's cross is headed across the box by Layvin Kurzawa and Antoine Griezmann can nod in.

The referee awarded the goal, but then got a word in his ear from the video assistant to say Kurzawa was offside.

CORRECT decision and video technology has worked on this occasion.
13:38
On-loan AC Milan winger Gerard Deulofeu gets on the end of David Silva's cross to convert the second.

The Spaniard celebrates but the assistant's flag is up.

Disallowed? No, wait.

The referee consults with his video assistant, who checks and sees Deulofeu is actually on side and the goal is given.

CORRECT decision once again. Cannot argue with video technology thus far.
Just to recap...

France have had a goal disallowed because of the video assistant - the correct decision

Spain have had a goal awarded because of the video assistant - the correct decision again.
Culled from BBC
Last edited by Cito on Tue Mar 28, 2017 10:31 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"Learn from others whom have walked the path before you, but be smart enough to know when to cut your own trail."
platinum
Eaglet
Eaglet
Posts: 40750
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 10:30 pm
Re: Video Technology in Use

Post by platinum »

They've used it twice. First to disallow a French goal, then again to allow a Spanish goal. Very crisp and properly used.
Evans Bipi, had declared to the press, “Why must [Governor Amaechi] be insulting my mother, my Jesus Christ on earth?”
User avatar
Cito
Eaglet
Eaglet
Posts: 17419
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 6:16 pm
Contact:
Re: Video Technology in Use

Post by Cito »

platinum wrote:They've used it twice. First to disallow a French goal, then again to allow a Spanish goal. Very crisp and properly used.
The concern was it may take too long to reach a decision but it seem to take less time than it takes to celebrate a goal.
"Learn from others whom have walked the path before you, but be smart enough to know when to cut your own trail."
platinum
Eaglet
Eaglet
Posts: 40750
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 10:30 pm
Re: Video Technology in Use

Post by platinum »

Cito wrote:
platinum wrote:They've used it twice. First to disallow a French goal, then again to allow a Spanish goal. Very crisp and properly used.
The concern was it may take too long to reach a decision but it seem to take less time than it takes to celebrate a goal.
That concern has always been ridiculous. People fear change so much.
Hopefully it goes mainstream.
Evans Bipi, had declared to the press, “Why must [Governor Amaechi] be insulting my mother, my Jesus Christ on earth?”
User avatar
benteke
Eaglet
Eaglet
Posts: 10143
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:20 pm
Re: Video Technology in Use

Post by benteke »

platinum wrote:
Cito wrote:
platinum wrote:They've used it twice. First to disallow a French goal, then again to allow a Spanish goal. Very crisp and properly used.
The concern was it may take too long to reach a decision but it seem to take less time than it takes to celebrate a goal.
That concern has always been ridiculous. People fear change so much.
Hopefully it goes mainstream.
When exactly may it go mainstream ?

It is very wonderfull and fair, i hope it also applies to card decisions.
User avatar
tfco
Eagle
Eagle
Posts: 76158
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 6:49 pm
Location: Accra, Old Trafford, Takoradi, Canada
Contact:
Re: Video Technology in Use

Post by tfco »

Cito wrote:
platinum wrote:They've used it twice. First to disallow a French goal, then again to allow a Spanish goal. Very crisp and properly used.
The concern was it may take too long to reach a decision but it seem to take less time than it takes to celebrate a goal.
actually it takes longer than it takes to celebrate a goal.
Griezmann was celebrating his goal well into the night until the video evidence disallowed the goal

that said, this is progress, and i am all for it

Arsenal vs Burnley

AFCON 2024 L-O-S-E-R-S

They did not CEDIS coming
Naira Did We :rotf: :rotf:


User avatar
Cito
Eaglet
Eaglet
Posts: 17419
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 6:16 pm
Contact:
Re: Video Technology in Use

Post by Cito »

tfco wrote:
Cito wrote:
platinum wrote:They've used it twice. First to disallow a French goal, then again to allow a Spanish goal. Very crisp and properly used.
The concern was it may take too long to reach a decision but it seem to take less time than it takes to celebrate a goal.
actually it takes longer than it takes to celebrate a goal.
Griezmann was celebrating his goal well into the night until the video evidence disallowed the goal

that said, this is progress, and i am all for it

Arsenal vs Burnley
That didn't make sense. You just contradicted yourself with your statements. You said it takes more time and then went ahead to contradict your self by stating a decision was reached while a goal celebration was still in progress.

I have seen goals celebrations and arguments that ensues which has taken more than double the one minute or less it took to make the decisions last night. Heck, even without the arguments and pleadings to ref sometimes celebration runs longer.

Yes Arsenal v Burnley and about ManU would have been 6-10 points less on the table thanks to those offside goals getting chalked off.
"Learn from others whom have walked the path before you, but be smart enough to know when to cut your own trail."
User avatar
mcal
Flying Eagle
Flying Eagle
Posts: 56338
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 3:01 am
Location: world of the americas
Re: Video Technology in Use

Post by mcal »

...may be in use where they can afford it. At concacaf wcq T&T v Mex, a goal by TnT was disallowed but replays by tv showed the guy was on side. I doubt if African nations will be able to use it.
kajifu
Eaglet
Eaglet
Posts: 40329
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 5:59 pm
Re: Video Technology in Use

Post by kajifu »

Hmm what about poor decision like player dive for PK and hand ball for PK?
kajifu
Eaglet
Eaglet
Posts: 40329
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 5:59 pm
Re: Video Technology in Use

Post by kajifu »

mcal wrote:...may be in use where they can afford it. At concacaf wcq T&T v Mex, a goal by TnT was disallowed but replays by tv showed the guy was on side. I doubt if African nations will be able to use it.
T&T goal was wrongly disallowed and it cost them that game.
User avatar
mcal
Flying Eagle
Flying Eagle
Posts: 56338
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 3:01 am
Location: world of the americas
Re: Video Technology in Use

Post by mcal »

kajifu wrote:
mcal wrote:...may be in use where they can afford it. At concacaf wcq T&T v Mex, a goal by TnT was disallowed but replays by tv showed the guy was on side. I doubt if African nations will be able to use it.
T&T goal was wrongly disallowed and it cost them that game.
...yeah, Mexico escaped there with all 3 pts.
User avatar
chendosplastic
Egg
Egg
Posts: 9025
Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 9:38 am
Location: iteakwa aka Port Harcourt
Re: Video Technology in Use

Post by chendosplastic »

tfco wrote:
Cito wrote:
platinum wrote:They've used it twice. First to disallow a French goal, then again to allow a Spanish goal. Very crisp and properly used.
The concern was it may take too long to reach a decision but it seem to take less time than it takes to celebrate a goal.
actually it takes longer than it takes to celebrate a goal.
Griezmann was celebrating his goal well into the night until the video evidence disallowed the goal

that said, this is progress, and i am all for it

Arsenal vs Burnley
Nonsense! ManUre vs Tottenham - 1.1m across the goal line, and no goal!
"The history book on the shelf is always repeating itself" - ABBA.
"Facts, Logic, truth is the way....stop ranting via emotions; seeing things through the prism of ethnicity is comfortable but ultimately a road to perdition." - airwolex.
User avatar
chendosplastic
Egg
Egg
Posts: 9025
Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 9:38 am
Location: iteakwa aka Port Harcourt
Re: Video Technology in Use

Post by chendosplastic »

mcal wrote:...may be in use where they can afford it. At concacaf wcq T&T v Mex, a goal by TnT was disallowed but replays by tv showed the guy was on side. I doubt if African nations will be able to use it.
Why not? If they install them then they will use them. Cost? FIFA can help where necessary.
"The history book on the shelf is always repeating itself" - ABBA.
"Facts, Logic, truth is the way....stop ranting via emotions; seeing things through the prism of ethnicity is comfortable but ultimately a road to perdition." - airwolex.
User avatar
toyin133
Eaglet
Eaglet
Posts: 13948
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2003 10:31 am
Re: Video Technology in Use

Post by toyin133 »

What will we have to argue about now?
"I hear Glenn Hoddle has found God. That must have been one hell of a pass." Jasper Carrott
"Mind you, football is not really about winning, or goals, or saves or supporters. It's about glory. It's about doing things in style, doing them with a flourish. It's
about going out to beat the other lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom."
Danny Blanchflower
kofi86
Egg
Egg
Posts: 9215
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 10:07 pm
Re: Video Technology in Use

Post by kofi86 »

Why would the linesmen raise the flag for offside? It they are correct, fine, but if they are wrong, how would you go on from there?
"If two grown men can't make a pervert happy for a few minutes in order to watch a film about zombies, then maybe we should all just move to Iran!"
jb
Egg
Egg
Posts: 699
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 1:40 am
Re: Video Technology in Use

Post by jb »

kajifu wrote:Hmm what about poor decision like player dive for PK and hand ball for PK?
......and Matuidi's stump on Onazi
User avatar
mcal
Flying Eagle
Flying Eagle
Posts: 56338
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 3:01 am
Location: world of the americas
Re: Video Technology in Use

Post by mcal »

chendosplastic wrote:
mcal wrote:...may be in use where they can afford it. At concacaf wcq T&T v Mex, a goal by TnT was disallowed but replays by tv showed the guy was on side. I doubt if African nations will be able to use it.
Why not? If they install them then they will use them. Cost? FIFA can help where necessary.
..."IF" is the big question. Electricity for stadiums will work "if" they install them, right? Plus we not gonna continue forever with hand outs from all corners.
Enugu II
Eaglet
Eaglet
Posts: 23633
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 2:39 am
Location: Super Eagles Homeland
Re: Video Technology in Use

Post by Enugu II »

Heard argument about time but so what? Is time more valuable than getting the call correct? IMHO, the time argument is weak. Consider how long a tennis game takes and yet people watch it and here people are bringing up a couple of minutes that may be added to get a call correct.
The difficulties of statistical thinking describes a puzzling limitation of our mind: our excessive confidence in what we believe we know, and our apparent inability to acknowledge the full extent of our ignorance and the uncertainty of the world we live in. We are prone to overestimate how much we understand about the world and to underestimate the role of chance in events -- Daniel Kahneman (2011), Winner of the Nobel Prize in Economics
Winner of the Nobel Prize in Economics
kofi86
Egg
Egg
Posts: 9215
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 10:07 pm
Re: Video Technology in Use

Post by kofi86 »

Enugu II wrote:Heard argument about time but so what? Is time more valuable than getting the call correct? IMHO, the time argument is weak. Consider how long a tennis game takes and yet people watch it and here people are bringing up a couple of minutes that may be added to get a call correct.
There is a huge difference between tennis and football though. A set of tennis consists of several more or less independet plays that are interrupted anyways. In football it is different. Take offside decisions for example. Will the linesmen keep raising their flag or not? If they raise the flag and video ref decides that their decision was wrong, how does the game continue? It is impossible to restore the situation. The logical thing therefore would be to continue every play and only stop if after the video ref has decided that it was indeed offside. That means the game continues until the ref announces the decision. If that for example takes a couple of miinutes a team might score in the meantime or a player might commit a foul that warrants a sending-off.

Would a possible red card for denying a goal scoring opportunity still stand in such a scenario? Or red card for violent conduct?
"If two grown men can't make a pervert happy for a few minutes in order to watch a film about zombies, then maybe we should all just move to Iran!"

Post Reply