Re: Penalty style is useless
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2017 7:27 pm
Yes.Coach wrote:By the time B have taken their fourth, A will have taken 3.
The sequence look like this:
AB BA AB BA AB
The Undisputed Number One Home for All Super Eagles Fans
https://forum.cybereagles.com/
Yes.Coach wrote:By the time B have taken their fourth, A will have taken 3.
Actually, that's true.Coach wrote:By the time B have taken their fourth, A will have taken 3.
What are you talking about?balo wrote:Coach wrote:It's believed there's an unfair advantage afforded the team going first with the latter constantly playing chase. ABBA supposedly levels that field. Irrespective of the timing of the kicks, one cannot legislate for the squander from 12 yards. Pathetic.
If this was to right a perceived wrong, then why not
ABBAAB?
Instead of letting one team take 4 shots, as opposed to the team supposedly going first, taking 2?
Cito wrote:What are you talking about?balo wrote:Coach wrote:It's believed there's an unfair advantage afforded the team going first with the latter constantly playing chase. ABBA supposedly levels that field. Irrespective of the timing of the kicks, one cannot legislate for the squander from 12 yards. Pathetic.
If this was to right a perceived wrong, then why not
ABBAAB?
Instead of letting one team take 4 shots, as opposed to the team supposedly going first, taking 2?
ABBA ABBA that is 4 shots each for the 2 teams....
balo wrote:Cito wrote:What are you talking about?balo wrote:Coach wrote:It's believed there's an unfair advantage afforded the team going first with the latter constantly playing chase. ABBA supposedly levels that field. Irrespective of the timing of the kicks, one cannot legislate for the squander from 12 yards. Pathetic.
If this was to right a perceived wrong, then why not
ABBAAB?
Instead of letting one team take 4 shots, as opposed to the team supposedly going first, taking 2?
ABBA ABBA that is 4 shots each for the 2 teams....
Yeah. The penalties yesterday did me in. lol.
Totally forgot Morata existed. I stopped breathing at Courtois' PK skill.
Shaking my head (smh)! Anyway, thx Oga Mcal, I will watch closely next time a penalty is played, perhaps you are correctmcal wrote:...what they need to look into and change is playing a man or more down. Penalize the offending player sent off with multiple games and some monetary fine depending on the gravity of the offense.
ABBA makes no difference, the onus of scoring and winning a pk shootout is on the players and goalies saving them.
I have figured out technique of saving a penalty.
When a player leans back to strike the ball, that means ball is going his right if a right footed taker, likewise a left footer.
But when the player's head is down and forward the ball is going to his left (across the body) likewise a left footer.
All this is a split second decision for the goalie to figure out, and decide where to dive to.
Just my take. Unfortunately I don't play anymore, I for practice am myself
Its not stupidity, there's a reason why they changed it.oloye wrote:And when they discover that ABBA favors or is not a level playing ground what will they do again? Stupidity is on the rise in the world as idiots keep trying to ubravel nature and fate. There is a reason why they toss the coin and ask if the winner of the toss want to kick or defend first!Coach wrote:It's believed there's an unfair advantage afforded the team going first with the latter constantly playing chase. ABBA supposedly levels that field. Irrespective of the timing of the kicks, one cannot legislate for the squander from 12 yards. Pathetic.
You know there is a reason behind everything including stupidity?Mr. Piffington wrote:Its not stupidity, there's a reason why they changed it.oloye wrote:And when they discover that ABBA favors or is not a level playing ground what will they do again? Stupidity is on the rise in the world as idiots keep trying to ubravel nature and fate. There is a reason why they toss the coin and ask if the winner of the toss want to kick or defend first!Coach wrote:It's believed there's an unfair advantage afforded the team going first with the latter constantly playing chase. ABBA supposedly levels that field. Irrespective of the timing of the kicks, one cannot legislate for the squander from 12 yards. Pathetic.
Stupidity is not the reason behind this change.oloye wrote:You know there is a reason behind everything including stupidity?Mr. Piffington wrote:Its not stupidity, there's a reason why they changed it.oloye wrote:And when they discover that ABBA favors or is not a level playing ground what will they do again? Stupidity is on the rise in the world as idiots keep trying to ubravel nature and fate. There is a reason why they toss the coin and ask if the winner of the toss want to kick or defend first!Coach wrote:It's believed there's an unfair advantage afforded the team going first with the latter constantly playing chase. ABBA supposedly levels that field. Irrespective of the timing of the kicks, one cannot legislate for the squander from 12 yards. Pathetic.
...kind of a secret but since I don't play or coach anymore why not throw it out thereOdas wrote:Shaking my head (smh)! Anyway, thx Oga Mcal, I will watch closely next time a penalty is played, perhaps you are correctmcal wrote:...what they need to look into and change is playing a man or more down. Penalize the offending player sent off with multiple games and some monetary fine depending on the gravity of the offense.
ABBA makes no difference, the onus of scoring and winning a pk shootout is on the players and goalies saving them.
I have figured out technique of saving a penalty.
When a player leans back to strike the ball, that means ball is going his right if a right footed taker, likewise a left footer.
But when the player's head is down and forward the ball is going to his left (across the body) likewise a left footer.
All this is a split second decision for the goalie to figure out, and decide where to dive to.
Just my take. Unfortunately I don't play anymore, I for practice am myself