Maher Mezahi on Group B

[Bigpokey24]

[/video]

Guys listen to this fella

speaks lots about the SE

[metalalloy]

Dis bobo sabi pass most loudmouths for dis site.

Thanks for sharing.

[realtrouble]

Thanks Bigpokey

[furiously frank]

He didn't give Zambia a chance at all and now see what happens...
His analysis are mostly reputation based and not performance or depth enriched.
I don't know why peeps here think he is all that plus

[metalalloy]

He didn't give Zambia a chance at all and now see what happens...
His analysis are mostly reputation based and not performance or depth enriched.
I don't know why peeps here think he is all that plus

No one thinks he is "all that plus." He is more knowledgeable than most people on this forum from his analysis of the sides in his vid.

And he was 100% right at the time that he made the video. Zambia had lost at home, and drawn away to two sides that were ranked higher than them. He is not a fortune teller, and simply made predictions based off objective facts that were present at that time. It is similar to using the fact that Leicester won the title to discrediting those who gave them a 5000-1 chance of winning it all.

What did Zambia do "performance wise" or "depth enriched" that suggested that after losing and tying their first two games, they would be on the verge of qualifying over a side that just won the African title 6 months ago or a team that won its first two games?

[furiously frank]

He didn't give Zambia a chance at all and now see what happens...
His analysis are mostly reputation based and not performance or depth enriched.
I don't know why peeps here think he is all that plus

No one things he is "all that plus." He is more knowledgeable than most people on this forum from his analysis of the sides in his vid.

And he was 100% right at the time that he made the video. Zambia had lost at home, and drawn away to two sides that were ranked higher than them. He is not a fortune teller, and simply made predictions based off objective facts that were present at that time. It is similar to using the fact that Leicester won the title to discrediting those who gave them a 5000-1 chance of winning it all.

What did Zambia do "performance wise" or "depth enriched" that suggested that after losing and tying their first two games, they would be on the verge of qualifying over a side that just won the African title 6 months ago or a team that won its first two games?

The injection of youth for instance. They did well with their Under 20, that should have been mentioned if he is a keen observer. Those boys have made the difference to the Zambia squad

[marutimon]

Yeah, those U20 boys could have won the U20 World Cup. They were good enough.

Those kids were really something. They change a Zambia side that is entertaining into one that is deadly. They have the one-touch passing and dribbling, but with end product. South African teams like to overcomplicate things, but these Zambian boys are good enough to actually pull it off.

Patson Daka has been picked up by Red Bull and they have a great track record in terms of talent.
I doubt Fashion Sakala will be in Russia for long. He is brilliant.

[Bigpokey24]

Yeah, those U20 boys could have won the U20 World Cup. They were good enough.

Those kids were really something. They change a Zambia side that is entertaining into one that is deadly. They have the one-touch passing and dribbling, but with end product. South African teams like to overcomplicate things, but these Zambian boys are good enough to actually pull it off.

Patson Daka has been picked up by Red Bull and they have a great track record in terms of talent.
I doubt Fashion Sakala will be in Russia for long. He is brilliant.

Awww

[Kabalega]

He didn't give Zambia a chance at all and now see what happens...
His analysis are mostly reputation based and not performance or depth enriched.
I don't know why peeps here think he is all that plus

No one things he is "all that plus." He is more knowledgeable than most people on this forum from his analysis of the sides in his vid.

And he was 100% right at the time that he made the video. Zambia had lost at home, and drawn away to two sides that were ranked higher than them. He is not a fortune teller, and simply made predictions based off objective facts that were present at that time. It is similar to using the fact that Leicester won the title to discrediting those who gave them a 5000-1 chance of winning it all.

What did Zambia do "performance wise" or "depth enriched" that suggested that after losing and tying their first two games, they would be on the verge of qualifying over a side that just won the African title 6 months ago or a team that won its first two games?

The injection of youth for instance. They did well with their Under 20, that should have been mentioned if he is a keen observer. Those boys have made the difference to the Zambia squad

Even more importantly, the announcement of the LC to call up players mostly from the top two local teams. One of which was doing well in CAF club competition.

These players play together all year round and have team chemistry, on top of current experience of the CAF landscape.

[Sheikh]

He didn't give Zambia a chance at all and now see what happens...
His analysis are mostly reputation based and not performance or depth enriched.
I don't know why peeps here think he is all that plus

No one things he is "all that plus." He is more knowledgeable than most people on this forum from his analysis of the sides in his vid.

And he was 100% right at the time that he made the video. Zambia had lost at home, and drawn away to two sides that were ranked higher than them. He is not a fortune teller, and simply made predictions based off objective facts that were present at that time. It is similar to using the fact that Leicester won the title to discrediting those who gave them a 5000-1 chance of winning it all.

What did Zambia do "performance wise" or "depth enriched" that suggested that after losing and tying their first two games, they would be on the verge of qualifying over a side that just won the African title 6 months ago or a team that won its first two games?

The injection of youth for instance. They did well with their Under 20, that should have been mentioned if he is a keen observer. Those boys have made the difference to the Zambia squad

Even more importantly, the announcement of the LC to call up players mostly from the top two local teams. One of which was doing well in CAF club competition.

These players play together all year round and have team chemistry, on top of current experience of the CAF landscape.

Nonetheless I think his assessments were spot on. Yes; Zambia beat Algeria twice but over the two games Algeria were in my view the superior team and had much more chances to score and win. Therefore the end results were somewhat bizarre, and did not reflect the actual balance of play.

[metalalloy]

He didn't give Zambia a chance at all and now see what happens...
His analysis are mostly reputation based and not performance or depth enriched.
I don't know why peeps here think he is all that plus

No one things he is "all that plus." He is more knowledgeable than most people on this forum from his analysis of the sides in his vid.

And he was 100% right at the time that he made the video. Zambia had lost at home, and drawn away to two sides that were ranked higher than them. He is not a fortune teller, and simply made predictions based off objective facts that were present at that time. It is similar to using the fact that Leicester won the title to discrediting those who gave them a 5000-1 chance of winning it all.

What did Zambia do "performance wise" or "depth enriched" that suggested that after losing and tying their first two games, they would be on the verge of qualifying over a side that just won the African title 6 months ago or a team that won its first two games?

The injection of youth for instance. They did well with their Under 20, that should have been mentioned if he is a keen observer. Those boys have made the difference to the Zambia squad

Again, his statements were made on or about January 2nd 2017 after match game 2 where they lost at home and tied the second game. Were the u-20 players injected into the squad at that point? If so, what happened to their effect in the first two games? His analysis was spot on at the time he made his video.

Even if the video was made later, but before the doubleheader against Algeria, there was little to suggest that Zambia's fortunes had changed. Zambia as recent as June this year, lost (again, AT HOME) to Mozambique in their nations cup qualifier, and are currently last in a group containing Guinea Bissau and Namibia.

[Gotti]

Yeah, those U20 boys could have won the U20 World Cup. They were good enough.

Those kids were really something. They change a Zambia side that is entertaining into one that is deadly. They have the one-touch passing and dribbling, but with end product. South African teams like to overcomplicate things, but these Zambian boys are good enough to actually pull it off.

Patson Daka has been picked up by Red Bull and they have a great track record in terms of talent.
I doubt Fashion Sakala will be in Russia for long. He is brilliant.

Awww

[Robbynice]

Yeah, those U20 boys could have won the U20 World Cup. They were good enough.

Those kids were really something. They change a Zambia side that is entertaining into one that is deadly. They have the one-touch passing and dribbling, but with end product. South African teams like to overcomplicate things, but these Zambian boys are good enough to actually pull it off.

Patson Daka has been picked up by Red Bull and they have a great track record in terms of talent.
I doubt Fashion Sakala will be in Russia for long. He is brilliant.

Awww