Chei, EPL's Money miss road...

[Kabalega]

Info by CIES Football Observatory.

Liverpool's poorer squad is worth £754m compared to Real Madrid's squad at £641m?

EDIT: Liverpool should have a big 1 in the medals column.
Thanks to joao for pointing this out.

[kajifu]

I see you miss also the most value player

[pajimoh]

Info by CIES Football Observatory.

Liverpool's poorer squad is worth £754m compared to Real Madrid's squad at £641m?

Brain miss road... Value is not how much they spend to assemble squad........but potentially how much the squad is worth in today's market. Age also has a lot to do with it.

More importantly, the experience of Real is invaluable or unquantifiable. Many would choose Real over Liverpool for this reason but in terms of sell on value, a young Liverpool side might hold their value more.

[Kabalega]

I see you miss also the most value player

Siddon look until Saturday....

[Kabalega]

Info by CIES Football Observatory.

Liverpool's poorer squad is worth £754m compared to Real Madrid's squad at £641m?

Brain miss road... Value is not how much they spend to assemble squad........but potentially how much the squad is worth in today's market. Age also has a lot to do with it.

More importantly, the experience of Real is invaluable or unquantifiable. Many would choose Real over Liverpool for this reason but in terms of sell on value, a young Liverpool side might hold their value more.

Look at squad depth.
Liverpool’s expensive squad has no depth, while Real Madrid’s bench can give Liverpool’s first team a run for their money.
Age does not account for such a huuuuge anomaly.
Sure, brain miss road, but it certainly is not on my end.

[pajimoh]

Info by CIES Football Observatory.

Liverpool's poorer squad is worth £754m compared to Real Madrid's squad at £641m?

Brain miss road... Value is not how much they spend to assemble squad........but potentially how much the squad is worth in today's market. Age also has a lot to do with it.

More importantly, the experience of Real is invaluable or unquantifiable. Many would choose Real over Liverpool for this reason but in terms of sell on value, a young Liverpool side might hold their value more.

Look at squad depth.
Liverpool’s expensive squad has no depth, while Real Madrid’s bench can give Liverpool’s first team a run for their money.
Age does not account for such a huuuuge anomaly.
Sure, brain miss road, but it certainly is not on my end.

That is why I talked about experience.. Value is a bit deceptive. The quality of Real Madrid players is higher than that of Liverpool but they are aging. A young Ronaldo will be worth more than most Liverpool players. You need to understand what goes into a players value. Dum dum

[ohenhen1]

But C Ronaldo is worth more than Salah even in todays market.

[Scipio Africanus]

But C Ronaldo is worth more than Salah even in todays market.

That is the key. I hope Ka-blabla-lega gets the point.

[Kabalega]

But C Ronaldo is worth more than Salah even in todays market.

That is the key. I hope Ka-blabla-lega gets the point.

I believe you missed ohenhen1's point.

Anyway, how can today's market be so skewed that Real Madrid's bench is good enough to beat Liverpool's first eleven yet Liverpools squad is way more expensive than Real Madrid's?

It's simply money miss road.

[joao]

Kabalega, your statistic info on champions league medalss is very flawed.
Zero for Liverpool, and forty for Real Madrid?
Shows that you are in a hurry to display your prejudice.
Please, just apologize and make corrections. Else, ...

[Kabalega]

Info by CIES Football Observatory.

Liverpool's poorer squad is worth £754m compared to Real Madrid's squad at £641m?

Brain miss road... Value is not how much they spend to assemble squad........but potentially how much the squad is worth in today's market. Age also has a lot to do with it.

More importantly, the experience of Real is invaluable or unquantifiable. Many would choose Real over Liverpool for this reason but in terms of sell on value, a young Liverpool side might hold their value more.

Look at squad depth.
Liverpool’s expensive squad has no depth, while Real Madrid’s bench can give Liverpool’s first team a run for their money.
Age does not account for such a huuuuge anomaly.
Sure, brain miss road, but it certainly is not on my end.

That is why I talked about experience.. Value is a bit deceptive. The quality of Real Madrid players is higher than that of Liverpool but they are aging. A young Ronaldo will be worth more than most Liverpool players. You need to understand what goes into a players value. Dum dum

So according to your theories, Real Madrid is a better squad but is older and thus cheaper than Liverpool's?
I just want to make sure I get your point.

[Scipio Africanus]

But C Ronaldo is worth more than Salah even in todays market.

That is the key. I hope Ka-blabla-lega gets the point.

I believe you missed ohenhen1's point.

Anyway, how can today's market be so skewed that Real Madrid's bench is good enough to beat Liverpool's first eleven yet Liverpools squad is way more expensive than Real Madrid's?

It's simply money miss road.

No you missed the point. You still don't get it. You compare based on current market value of all parties involved. Not prices paid years ago for some, and current price for others.

[Kabalega]

Kabalega, your statistic info on champions league medalss is very flawed.
Zero for Liverpool, and forty for Real Madrid?
Shows that you are in a hurry to display your prejudice.
Please, just apologize and make corrections. Else, ...

True, that's a screw up.

How can anyone forget Istanbul 2005? That one was a classic.

The big fat zero should be a 1.
NB: Please note anything before UEFA CL doesn't count.

[joao]

Kabalega, your statistic info on champions league medalss is very flawed.
Zero for Liverpool, and forty for Real Madrid?
Shows that you are in a hurry to display your prejudice.
Please, just apologize and make corrections. Else, ...

True, that's a screw up.
How can anyone forget Istanbul 2005? That one was a classic.
The big fat zero should be a 1.
NB: Please note anything before UEFA CL doesn't count.

...And please note, Real Madrid has not won 40 UEFA CLs.

[pajimoh]

Info by CIES Football Observatory.

Liverpool's poorer squad is worth £754m compared to Real Madrid's squad at £641m?

Brain miss road... Value is not how much they spend to assemble squad........but potentially how much the squad is worth in today's market. Age also has a lot to do with it.

More importantly, the experience of Real is invaluable or unquantifiable. Many would choose Real over Liverpool for this reason but in terms of sell on value, a young Liverpool side might hold their value more.

Look at squad depth.
Liverpool’s expensive squad has no depth, while Real Madrid’s bench can give Liverpool’s first team a run for their money.
Age does not account for such a huuuuge anomaly.
Sure, brain miss road, but it certainly is not on my end.

That is why I talked about experience.. Value is a bit deceptive. The quality of Real Madrid players is higher than that of Liverpool but they are aging. A young Ronaldo will be worth more than most Liverpool players. You need to understand what goes into a players value. Dum dum

So according to your theories, Real Madrid is a better squad but is older and thus cheaper than Liverpool's?
I just want to make sure I get your point.

The fact that you still don't understand is worrying. Who is better I a side issue from your topic headline. Let me just say this, anything with a diminishing returns, the value tends to go down. Players have diminishing returns with age. Some clubs will not give a 29 year ok a 5 year contract for a reason. What is the "sell on" value of 24 year ok compare to a 30 year old.

The price payed for Ronaldo is no longer a world record. Different times, different valuation. All these and more goes to make a players valuation. Separate this from which is the better team.

[kajifu]

But C Ronaldo is worth more than Salah even in todays market.

That is the key. I hope Ka-blabla-lega gets the point.

I believe you missed ohenhen1's point.

Anyway, how can today's market be so skewed that Real Madrid's bench is good enough to beat Liverpool's first eleven yet Liverpools squad is way more expensive than Real Madrid's?

It's simply money miss road.

So you sit on your computer and conclude that Real Madrid bench can beat Liverpool first 11.Na video game?Let Real first team beat Liverpool first team first.Did not spurs beat this same Realfirst team?

[Kabalega]

But C Ronaldo is worth more than Salah even in todays market.

That is the key. I hope Ka-blabla-lega gets the point.

I believe you missed ohenhen1's point.

Anyway, how can today's market be so skewed that Real Madrid's bench is good enough to beat Liverpool's first eleven yet Liverpools squad is way more expensive than Real Madrid's?

It's simply money miss road.

No you missed the point. You still don't get it. You compare based on current market value of all parties involved. Not prices paid years ago for some, and current price for others.

@scorpio and pajimoh, I get your points.

You have to agree though that if Real Madrid has the squad they have, then Real Madrid have probably managed their assets and funds better than Liverpool.


The real elephant in the room, is the EPL sticker price. You can mask it as “today’s prices” or “age” but anyway you slice and dice, it all boils down to the EPL over paying for players.

So you sit on your computer and conclude that Real Madrid bench can beat Liverpool first 11.Na video game?Let Real first team beat Liverpool first team first.Did not spurs beat this same Realfirst team?

Liverpool can beat Real Madrid’s first team but that does not mean that Real Madrid’s bench cannot beat Liverpool.

The key difference is that Liverpool’s bench cannot beat Real Madrid’s first or second eleven.
Which means that Liverpool's first eleven is way over valued.

[green4life]

Kabalega, your statistic info on champions league medalss is very flawed.
Zero for Liverpool, and forty for Real Madrid?
Shows that you are in a hurry to display your prejudice.
Please, just apologize and make corrections. Else, ...

True, that's a screw up.
How can anyone forget Istanbul 2005? That one was a classic.
The big fat zero should be a 1.
NB: Please note anything before UEFA CL doesn't count.

...And please note, Real Madrid has not won 40 UEFA CLs.

Sometimes I wonder for am.

[YemiBrazil]

Kabalega, your statistic info on champions league medalss is very flawed.
Zero for Liverpool, and forty for Real Madrid?
Shows that you are in a hurry to display your prejudice.
Please, just apologize and make corrections. Else, ...

True, that's a screw up.
How can anyone forget Istanbul 2005? That one was a classic.
The big fat zero should be a 1.
NB: Please note anything before UEFA CL doesn't count.

...And please note, Real Madrid has not won 40 UEFA CLs.

Maybe they refer to UEFA CL medals count for the current squad ?

[Kabalega]

Kabalega, your statistic info on champions league medalss is very flawed.
Zero for Liverpool, and forty for Real Madrid?
Shows that you are in a hurry to display your prejudice.
Please, just apologize and make corrections. Else, ...

True, that's a screw up.
How can anyone forget Istanbul 2005? That one was a classic.
The big fat zero should be a 1.
NB: Please note anything before UEFA CL doesn't count.

...And please note, Real Madrid has not won 40 UEFA CLs.

Maybe they refer to UEFA CL medals count for the current squad ?

Good point.