Nabil Fekir to Liverpool

Where Eagles dare! Discuss Nigerian related football (soccer) topics here.

Moderators: Moderator Team, phpBB2 - Administrators

User avatar
danfo driver
Posts: 18407
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 7:48 pm

Re: Nabil Fekir to Liverpool

Post by danfo driver »

txj wrote:
green4life wrote:
heavyd wrote:
danfo driver wrote:
heavyd wrote:
Chief Ogbunigwe wrote:how many players does Liverpool want/need? Naby Keita, Thomas Lemar, etc nko?
We are no longer interested in Lemar. He was overpriced as far as the club is concerned.

They are probably concentrating now on a backup winger which is why Moses Simon and Shaquiri are been mentioned.
personally I think we need a backup to Firminho.
For me the player we should be looking at is Marko Arnautovic - Great energy, strength and can score goals
Ah! What about So-Lanky? :D
Still too Raw... Should go out on loan and develop further
... so no different from the advice he received from Chelsea? :dream:
On the contrary, he has played 21 times in the PL for Liverpool, with a goal and an assist; and an another controversially ruled out. How many games did he play for Chelsea?
1 goal and 1 assist in 21 games. :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: I think you are proving green4life's point.
metalalloy wrote: Does the SE have Gray, Mahrez or Albrighton on our team or players of their caliber?
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
wale1974
Posts: 25273
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 8:42 pm
Location: Ikeja

Re: Nabil Fekir to Liverpool

Post by wale1974 »

Wow
"Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free our minds!" - Bob Marley
User avatar
txj
Posts: 31958
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 11:35 pm

Re: Nabil Fekir to Liverpool

Post by txj »

@G4L;

See an assessment of Solanke's season. He is certainly growing; perhaps not fast enough, but certainly beyond his experience at Chelsea.



Dominic Solanke’s season of half-chances sets challenge for improved Liverpool role
Chris WilliamsChris Williams
@Chris78Williams
Opinion, 9 June 2018

Dominic Solanke‘s first season at Liverpool saw the youngster rely on cameos and half-chances for an opportunity to impress at his new club.


Signed last summer, the teenager was perhaps a surprise arrival — and it wasn’t clear whether he would go immediately into the first-team fold or spend more time with the U23s.

Moving after his contract ended at Chelsea, there was always going to be an argument over a settlement fee — aged under 24, the west London club would be entitled to a payment for his development, the disagreement would centre around how much.

The Blues valued him at £10 million whilst the Reds had a figure of £3 million in mind. The fee still hasn’t been agreed now a year later.

Despite this, the overriding thought was of where he would fit in; Daniel Sturridge had been beset by injury but was still the main option from the bench, while both Divock Origi and Danny Ings had shown in flashes that they could be called upon—if fit.

It looked like Solanke would be fifth choice in the pecking order of Liverpool strikers.

But after impressing in the U20 World Cup, scoring four goals for tournament winners England, pre-season then offered an opportunity for the player to stake his claim.

Frank de Boer’s Crystal Palace faced the Reds first and Solanke was to make everyone sit up and take notice of his arrival shortly after his second-half introduction.

Receiving the ball with his back to goal, and with a sharp touch out of his feet, he unleashed a shot from 25 yards that left Wayne Hennessey a spectator.

Jurgen Klopp gave his substitute a rapturous round of applause—it was a fantastic strike.

By the time pre-season had finished, Solanke had found the net on a further two occasions, against Hertha Berlin and Athletic Bilbao—not a bad introduction, but what would await him once the full season got underway? Could he realistically expect any game time?

Klopp answered the question almost immediately: Origi was sent on a season-long loan to Wolfsburg and Solanke was preferred to both Sturridge and Ings.

By the time the 2017/18 season was a month old the young striker had made four appearances—one in the Champions League Playoff and three in the Premier League; however, crucially he’d only featured for 58 minutes—it was to set the tone for the majority of his season.

Started: 6 (All competitions)
On as a substitute: 21
Unused sub: 22
Goals: 1
Assists: 1
Average TIA Player Rating: 6.4 (Rank = 12th)

Liverpool’s front three of Mohamed Salah, Roberto Firmino and Sadio Mane were not only setting the Premier League alight, they were quickly establishing themselves as the most potent strike force in Europe.

As such, the Solanke was going to find it hard to break into any sort of full-time striking role.

January saw Sturridge depart to West Brom and Solanke continued to get the nod ahead of fellow benchwarmer Ings, but he was still in search of his first Liverpool goal.

An assist had already been achieved against Stoke City where Solanke arguably put in one of his best performances.

Salah needed a rest and Solanke was thrown a rare start against the Potters; it was a chance for him to show his worth and he duly took it.

Whilst he may not have filled the gap left by the soaring Egyptian, Solanke put in a good shift which ultimately resulted in a neat piece of play inside the 18-yard-box.

What followed was a clever ball to Mane and bang, Liverpool had their opener.

From thereon in Solanke’s season became a stutter. Following the Stoke game he got a two-minute cameo against Brighton, before getting another start against neighbours Everton.

It should have been an opportunity for the Englishman to shine but Liverpool opted for a less familiar 4-1-4-1 formation.

He was replaced on 77 minutes by Ings and a controversial penalty saw the Blues leave Anfield with a draw.

Criticism was beginning to be fired at the striker from some angles: was he at a level ready to wear the red shirt?

Many said no, but strikers rely on constant game time and working relationships built on the pitch.

Training is no substitute for match action and Solanke was getting very few minutes to work with. It was understandable due to the now-cemented front three, but this was hardly his fault.

The situation that Solanke found himself in was highlighted against Chelsea in May as Liverpool pushed for Champions League qualification.

With 16 minutes remaining he was given a chance from the bench against his old club, the Reds were chasing a 1-0 deficit thanks to Olivier Giroud’s first-half header.

As the clock ticked into added time the young striker found himself with space inside the box, all he had to do was steer his header into the goal, he couldn’t and the chance soared over the bar.

It was a massive three points dropped at Stamford Bridge and the fury of Liverpool potentially missing out on fourth place was too much for many to take.

Solanke seemed an easy target and that was enough for some.

Strikers need game time, they need chances and they need consistency.

With a few moments here and there Klopp had sacrificed the youngster for the bigger picture—once again, fully understandable, but not everyone was either aware or sympathetic.

On the final day of the Premier League season Solanke would have his say though.

Liverpool faced Brighton in a do-or-die situation: the Reds needed a win to ensure their season didn’t come down to a Champions League playoff in the final against Real Madrid.

Solanke was chosen to partner Firmino in a 4-4-2 formation—Klopp had one eye on Kyiv.

The No. 29 was equal to the manager’s request, and with a fellow forward to work with he rolled back the months to his time in Asia, smashing the ball into the top corner from just inside the area to put the Reds 3-0 up.

It was a wonderful finish and with that Solanke had bookended his first season at Liverpool with two fabulous strikes.

With Liverpool once again fighting on four fronts, and many players returning from a World Cup late this summer, Solanke could get considerably more game time during 2018/19.

However, a loan move could also be on the cards if Klopp’s past decisions on youth players are taken into consideration.

This would, though, leave the Reds short on striking options should something happen to the established front three.

For Solanke to develop fully he’ll need game time and this should come in the form of the domestic cups, so a good run in either the FA Cup or League Cup should allow the striker to get desperately needed consistent minutes at some level.

Liverpool’s return to the Champions League should also allow Solanke to feature in some group games, as well as Premier League clashes that follow the European midweek, should Klopp wish to rotate his front three and keep them fresh as possible; though this depends on further signings.

Whatever happens though, Solanke will need more than two minutes here and 14 there to establish himself as a fully functioning striker.

This is something that Klopp will either have to accept, or work around, as he seeks to guide Liverpool to that so far elusive trophy.

Best Moment: The final day of the season and a blistering goal at the Anfield Road end.

Worst Moment: Missing an injury-time golden opportunity away at Stamford Bridge.

Role next season: To try and pressurise the manager to give him more minutes, especially in the domestic cup competitions.
Form is temporary; Class is Permanent!
Liverpool, European Champions 2005.

We watched this very boring video, 500 times, of Sacchi doing defensive drills, using sticks and without the ball, with Maldini, Baresi and Albertini. We used to think before then that if the other players are better, you have to lose. After that we learned anything is possible – you can beat better teams by using tactics." Jurgen Klopp
User avatar
Dammy
Posts: 10899
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2003 9:33 pm

Re: Nabil Fekir to Liverpool

Post by Dammy »

Fekir failed medicals?
I am happy
User avatar
balo
Posts: 47563
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 10:47 pm
Location: Akoko Highlands

Re: Nabil Fekir to Liverpool

Post by balo »

The deal hit a snag? Should have done the medical at SB. Wouldn't be a deal breaker. :D
If Noah had been truly wise, he would have swatted those two flies. -- Helen Castle

http://i42.tinypic.com/210hk01.jpg
smartbrother
Posts: 16783
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 10:37 pm

Re: Nabil Fekir to Liverpool

Post by smartbrother »

looks like liverpool will have to settle for moses siimon :rotf: :rotf:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/44425961
User avatar
YemiBrazil
Posts: 27386
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 7:01 pm
Location: Copacabana
Contact:

Re: Nabil Fekir to Liverpool

Post by YemiBrazil »

:lol: :lol: :lol:
*** Every child is A STAR! ***
SUPER EAGLES!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------
"A revolution in a personal context, is a turn around of a predominant way of thinking or doing things TO BETTER YOURSELF and effectively BETTER YOUR NATION!!!"
* Progressive Federalism * Personal Revolution * Industrialization *
User avatar
pajimoh
Posts: 32630
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:32 pm

Re: Nabil Fekir to Liverpool

Post by pajimoh »

Did Nabil just say "Fekya" to Looserf00ls?
Super Eagles - Fly Above The Storm!!!
User avatar
TonyTheTigerKiller
Posts: 9338
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 7:55 pm

Re: Nabil Fekir to Liverpool

Post by TonyTheTigerKiller »

I tend not to read too much meaning into pre World Cup friendlies otherwise I would have concluded that the Nabil Fekir I watched play against the US is nothing to write home about. That’s also the same reason I am not in the least concerned about our performance in the series of friendlies. The regular players play to avoid injury and Rohr knows this too. Those of you who have been ejaculating seismically at the amount of playing time given to the likes of Uzoho, Ebuehi and Idowu are going to be awfully disappointed when Rohr predictably sticks with his regular crew :!: :!: :!:


Cheers.
User avatar
green4life
Posts: 43463
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2003 4:49 pm

Re: Nabil Fekir to Liverpool

Post by green4life »

The reality is he was effectively Firminho’s backup and feel way below expectations required of a backup striker. That he only scored 1 goal for the entire season (and yes, I watched many of his performances) is telling of the shortfall in job requirement considering that Mitchy scored around 7 goals before he was sent out on loan in January.

He might have improved but he’s nowhere near ready for a team that is ambitious of wining the league. That is why Chelsea sent him out on loan rather than give him those minutes from the bench. That said, I expect his production to improve this season given baring injury, it’s near impossible to score less than 1 goal again for an entire season. But that’s not the relevant issue. The main question for Pool is whether Solanke is good enough as a back up (#2 number 9) to allow Pool achieve its primary objective of becoming champions of England next season? The answer clearly is No. Why? Same reason Chelsea sent him on loan but he refused saying he wanted regular PT with the first team. And in terms of progress, at this moment I still prefer Tammy over Solanke. Better all around game at the moment without a doubt.
txj wrote:@G4L;

See an assessment of Solanke's season. He is certainly growing; perhaps not fast enough, but certainly beyond his experience at Chelsea.



Dominic Solanke’s season of half-chances sets challenge for improved Liverpool role
Chris WilliamsChris Williams
@Chris78Williams
Opinion, 9 June 2018

Dominic Solanke‘s first season at Liverpool saw the youngster rely on cameos and half-chances for an opportunity to impress at his new club.


Signed last summer, the teenager was perhaps a surprise arrival — and it wasn’t clear whether he would go immediately into the first-team fold or spend more time with the U23s.

Moving after his contract ended at Chelsea, there was always going to be an argument over a settlement fee — aged under 24, the west London club would be entitled to a payment for his development, the disagreement would centre around how much.

The Blues valued him at £10 million whilst the Reds had a figure of £3 million in mind. The fee still hasn’t been agreed now a year later.

Despite this, the overriding thought was of where he would fit in; Daniel Sturridge had been beset by injury but was still the main option from the bench, while both Divock Origi and Danny Ings had shown in flashes that they could be called upon—if fit.

It looked like Solanke would be fifth choice in the pecking order of Liverpool strikers.

But after impressing in the U20 World Cup, scoring four goals for tournament winners England, pre-season then offered an opportunity for the player to stake his claim.

Frank de Boer’s Crystal Palace faced the Reds first and Solanke was to make everyone sit up and take notice of his arrival shortly after his second-half introduction.

Receiving the ball with his back to goal, and with a sharp touch out of his feet, he unleashed a shot from 25 yards that left Wayne Hennessey a spectator.

Jurgen Klopp gave his substitute a rapturous round of applause—it was a fantastic strike.

By the time pre-season had finished, Solanke had found the net on a further two occasions, against Hertha Berlin and Athletic Bilbao—not a bad introduction, but what would await him once the full season got underway? Could he realistically expect any game time?

Klopp answered the question almost immediately: Origi was sent on a season-long loan to Wolfsburg and Solanke was preferred to both Sturridge and Ings.

By the time the 2017/18 season was a month old the young striker had made four appearances—one in the Champions League Playoff and three in the Premier League; however, crucially he’d only featured for 58 minutes—it was to set the tone for the majority of his season.

Started: 6 (All competitions)
On as a substitute: 21
Unused sub: 22
Goals: 1
Assists: 1
Average TIA Player Rating: 6.4 (Rank = 12th)

Liverpool’s front three of Mohamed Salah, Roberto Firmino and Sadio Mane were not only setting the Premier League alight, they were quickly establishing themselves as the most potent strike force in Europe.

As such, the Solanke was going to find it hard to break into any sort of full-time striking role.

January saw Sturridge depart to West Brom and Solanke continued to get the nod ahead of fellow benchwarmer Ings, but he was still in search of his first Liverpool goal.

An assist had already been achieved against Stoke City where Solanke arguably put in one of his best performances.

Salah needed a rest and Solanke was thrown a rare start against the Potters; it was a chance for him to show his worth and he duly took it.

Whilst he may not have filled the gap left by the soaring Egyptian, Solanke put in a good shift which ultimately resulted in a neat piece of play inside the 18-yard-box.

What followed was a clever ball to Mane and bang, Liverpool had their opener.

From thereon in Solanke’s season became a stutter. Following the Stoke game he got a two-minute cameo against Brighton, before getting another start against neighbours Everton.

It should have been an opportunity for the Englishman to shine but Liverpool opted for a less familiar 4-1-4-1 formation.

He was replaced on 77 minutes by Ings and a controversial penalty saw the Blues leave Anfield with a draw.

Criticism was beginning to be fired at the striker from some angles: was he at a level ready to wear the red shirt?

Many said no, but strikers rely on constant game time and working relationships built on the pitch.

Training is no substitute for match action and Solanke was getting very few minutes to work with. It was understandable due to the now-cemented front three, but this was hardly his fault.

The situation that Solanke found himself in was highlighted against Chelsea in May as Liverpool pushed for Champions League qualification.

With 16 minutes remaining he was given a chance from the bench against his old club, the Reds were chasing a 1-0 deficit thanks to Olivier Giroud’s first-half header.

As the clock ticked into added time the young striker found himself with space inside the box, all he had to do was steer his header into the goal, he couldn’t and the chance soared over the bar.

It was a massive three points dropped at Stamford Bridge and the fury of Liverpool potentially missing out on fourth place was too much for many to take.

Solanke seemed an easy target and that was enough for some.

Strikers need game time, they need chances and they need consistency.

With a few moments here and there Klopp had sacrificed the youngster for the bigger picture—once again, fully understandable, but not everyone was either aware or sympathetic.

On the final day of the Premier League season Solanke would have his say though.

Liverpool faced Brighton in a do-or-die situation: the Reds needed a win to ensure their season didn’t come down to a Champions League playoff in the final against Real Madrid.

Solanke was chosen to partner Firmino in a 4-4-2 formation—Klopp had one eye on Kyiv.

The No. 29 was equal to the manager’s request, and with a fellow forward to work with he rolled back the months to his time in Asia, smashing the ball into the top corner from just inside the area to put the Reds 3-0 up.

It was a wonderful finish and with that Solanke had bookended his first season at Liverpool with two fabulous strikes.

With Liverpool once again fighting on four fronts, and many players returning from a World Cup late this summer, Solanke could get considerably more game time during 2018/19.

However, a loan move could also be on the cards if Klopp’s past decisions on youth players are taken into consideration.

This would, though, leave the Reds short on striking options should something happen to the established front three.

For Solanke to develop fully he’ll need game time and this should come in the form of the domestic cups, so a good run in either the FA Cup or League Cup should allow the striker to get desperately needed consistent minutes at some level.

Liverpool’s return to the Champions League should also allow Solanke to feature in some group games, as well as Premier League clashes that follow the European midweek, should Klopp wish to rotate his front three and keep them fresh as possible; though this depends on further signings.

Whatever happens though, Solanke will need more than two minutes here and 14 there to establish himself as a fully functioning striker.

This is something that Klopp will either have to accept, or work around, as he seeks to guide Liverpool to that so far elusive trophy.

Best Moment: The final day of the season and a blistering goal at the Anfield Road end.

Worst Moment: Missing an injury-time golden opportunity away at Stamford Bridge.

Role next season: To try and pressurise the manager to give him more minutes, especially in the domestic cup competitions.
User avatar
green4life
Posts: 43463
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2003 4:49 pm

Re: Nabil Fekir to Liverpool

Post by green4life »

Tell me about it. This matter is as clear as night and day so I don’t understand txj’s argument. Sometimes a club will get it wrong but this is not one of those situations. If they go into next season with Solanke as Firmino’s back up I will know for sure that they have no ambitions of wining the league.
danfo driver wrote:
txj wrote:
green4life wrote:
heavyd wrote:
danfo driver wrote:
heavyd wrote:
Chief Ogbunigwe wrote:how many players does Liverpool want/need? Naby Keita, Thomas Lemar, etc nko?
We are no longer interested in Lemar. He was overpriced as far as the club is concerned.

They are probably concentrating now on a backup winger which is why Moses Simon and Shaquiri are been mentioned.
personally I think we need a backup to Firminho.
For me the player we should be looking at is Marko Arnautovic - Great energy, strength and can score goals
Ah! What about So-Lanky? :D
Still too Raw... Should go out on loan and develop further
... so no different from the advice he received from Chelsea? :dream:
On the contrary, he has played 21 times in the PL for Liverpool, with a goal and an assist; and an another controversially ruled out. How many games did he play for Chelsea?
1 goal and 1 assist in 21 games. :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: I think you are proving green4life's point.
User avatar
green4life
Posts: 43463
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2003 4:49 pm

Re: Nabil Fekir to Liverpool

Post by green4life »

TonyTheTigerKiller wrote:I tend not to read too much meaning into pre World Cup friendlies otherwise I would have concluded that the Nabil Fekir I watched play against the US is nothing to write home about. That’s also the same reason I am not in the least concerned about our performance in the series of friendlies. The regular players play to avoid injury and Rohr knows this too. Those of you who have been ejaculating seismically at the amount of playing time given to the likes of Uzoho, Ebuehi and Idowu are going to be awfully disappointed when Rohr predictably sticks with his regular crew :!: :!: :!:


Cheers.
Actually I thought he played well against USA. Also keep in mind he only played the last 15 to 20 odd mins.
User avatar
balo
Posts: 47563
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 10:47 pm
Location: Akoko Highlands

Re: Nabil Fekir to Liverpool

Post by balo »

txj wrote:@G4L;

See an assessment of Solanke's season. He is certainly growing; perhaps not fast enough, but certainly beyond his experience at Chelsea.



Dominic Solanke’s season of half-chances sets challenge for improved Liverpool role
Chris WilliamsChris Williams
@Chris78Williams
Opinion, 9 June 2018

Dominic Solanke‘s first season at Liverpool saw the youngster rely on cameos and half-chances for an opportunity to impress at his new club.


Signed last summer, the teenager was perhaps a surprise arrival — and it wasn’t clear whether he would go immediately into the first-team fold or spend more time with the U23s.

Moving after his contract ended at Chelsea, there was always going to be an argument over a settlement fee — aged under 24, the west London club would be entitled to a payment for his development, the disagreement would centre around how much.

The Blues valued him at £10 million whilst the Reds had a figure of £3 million in mind. The fee still hasn’t been agreed now a year later.

Despite this, the overriding thought was of where he would fit in; Daniel Sturridge had been beset by injury but was still the main option from the bench, while both Divock Origi and Danny Ings had shown in flashes that they could be called upon—if fit.

It looked like Solanke would be fifth choice in the pecking order of Liverpool strikers.

But after impressing in the U20 World Cup, scoring four goals for tournament winners England, pre-season then offered an opportunity for the player to stake his claim.

Frank de Boer’s Crystal Palace faced the Reds first and Solanke was to make everyone sit up and take notice of his arrival shortly after his second-half introduction.

Receiving the ball with his back to goal, and with a sharp touch out of his feet, he unleashed a shot from 25 yards that left Wayne Hennessey a spectator.

Jurgen Klopp gave his substitute a rapturous round of applause—it was a fantastic strike.

By the time pre-season had finished, Solanke had found the net on a further two occasions, against Hertha Berlin and Athletic Bilbao—not a bad introduction, but what would await him once the full season got underway? Could he realistically expect any game time?

Klopp answered the question almost immediately: Origi was sent on a season-long loan to Wolfsburg and Solanke was preferred to both Sturridge and Ings.

By the time the 2017/18 season was a month old the young striker had made four appearances—one in the Champions League Playoff and three in the Premier League; however, crucially he’d only featured for 58 minutes—it was to set the tone for the majority of his season.

Started: 6 (All competitions)
On as a substitute: 21
Unused sub: 22
Goals: 1
Assists: 1
Average TIA Player Rating: 6.4 (Rank = 12th)

Liverpool’s front three of Mohamed Salah, Roberto Firmino and Sadio Mane were not only setting the Premier League alight, they were quickly establishing themselves as the most potent strike force in Europe.

As such, the Solanke was going to find it hard to break into any sort of full-time striking role.

January saw Sturridge depart to West Brom and Solanke continued to get the nod ahead of fellow benchwarmer Ings, but he was still in search of his first Liverpool goal.

An assist had already been achieved against Stoke City where Solanke arguably put in one of his best performances.

Salah needed a rest and Solanke was thrown a rare start against the Potters; it was a chance for him to show his worth and he duly took it.

Whilst he may not have filled the gap left by the soaring Egyptian, Solanke put in a good shift which ultimately resulted in a neat piece of play inside the 18-yard-box.

What followed was a clever ball to Mane and bang, Liverpool had their opener.

From thereon in Solanke’s season became a stutter. Following the Stoke game he got a two-minute cameo against Brighton, before getting another start against neighbours Everton.

It should have been an opportunity for the Englishman to shine but Liverpool opted for a less familiar 4-1-4-1 formation.

He was replaced on 77 minutes by Ings and a controversial penalty saw the Blues leave Anfield with a draw.

Criticism was beginning to be fired at the striker from some angles: was he at a level ready to wear the red shirt?

Many said no, but strikers rely on constant game time and working relationships built on the pitch.

Training is no substitute for match action and Solanke was getting very few minutes to work with. It was understandable due to the now-cemented front three, but this was hardly his fault.

The situation that Solanke found himself in was highlighted against Chelsea in May as Liverpool pushed for Champions League qualification.

With 16 minutes remaining he was given a chance from the bench against his old club, the Reds were chasing a 1-0 deficit thanks to Olivier Giroud’s first-half header.

As the clock ticked into added time the young striker found himself with space inside the box, all he had to do was steer his header into the goal, he couldn’t and the chance soared over the bar.

It was a massive three points dropped at Stamford Bridge and the fury of Liverpool potentially missing out on fourth place was too much for many to take.

Solanke seemed an easy target and that was enough for some.

Strikers need game time, they need chances and they need consistency.

With a few moments here and there Klopp had sacrificed the youngster for the bigger picture—once again, fully understandable, but not everyone was either aware or sympathetic.

On the final day of the Premier League season Solanke would have his say though.

Liverpool faced Brighton in a do-or-die situation: the Reds needed a win to ensure their season didn’t come down to a Champions League playoff in the final against Real Madrid.

Solanke was chosen to partner Firmino in a 4-4-2 formation—Klopp had one eye on Kyiv.

The No. 29 was equal to the manager’s request, and with a fellow forward to work with he rolled back the months to his time in Asia, smashing the ball into the top corner from just inside the area to put the Reds 3-0 up.

It was a wonderful finish and with that Solanke had bookended his first season at Liverpool with two fabulous strikes.

With Liverpool once again fighting on four fronts, and many players returning from a World Cup late this summer, Solanke could get considerably more game time during 2018/19.

However, a loan move could also be on the cards if Klopp’s past decisions on youth players are taken into consideration.

This would, though, leave the Reds short on striking options should something happen to the established front three.

For Solanke to develop fully he’ll need game time and this should come in the form of the domestic cups, so a good run in either the FA Cup or League Cup should allow the striker to get desperately needed consistent minutes at some level.

Liverpool’s return to the Champions League should also allow Solanke to feature in some group games, as well as Premier League clashes that follow the European midweek, should Klopp wish to rotate his front three and keep them fresh as possible; though this depends on further signings.

Whatever happens though, Solanke will need more than two minutes here and 14 there to establish himself as a fully functioning striker.

This is something that Klopp will either have to accept, or work around, as he seeks to guide Liverpool to that so far elusive trophy.

Best Moment: The final day of the season and a blistering goal at the Anfield Road end.

Worst Moment: Missing an injury-time golden opportunity away at Stamford Bridge.

Role next season: To try and pressurise the manager to give him more minutes, especially in the domestic cup competitions.

How did this pan out for Solanke at Liverpool? Patience is a virtue.
If Noah had been truly wise, he would have swatted those two flies. -- Helen Castle

http://i42.tinypic.com/210hk01.jpg
User avatar
balo
Posts: 47563
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 10:47 pm
Location: Akoko Highlands

Re: Nabil Fekir to Liverpool

Post by balo »

Good luck to him at Bournemouth. Maybe a plan B should they lose Callum to Chelsea. If they don't, then Solanke better be ready for bench duty again.
If Noah had been truly wise, he would have swatted those two flies. -- Helen Castle

http://i42.tinypic.com/210hk01.jpg
User avatar
cchinukw
Moderator
Posts: 34736
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2003 1:27 pm
Location: Displaced Naija. Don't bother

Re: Nabil Fekir to Liverpool

Post by cchinukw »

At this rate, we may as well surrender the Premier League title to Liverpool for the next 5 years and just turn up.
MAGA - Make Arsenal Great Again.

The only reason I can think of that God would have put Trump into office was because He ran out of locusts.
User avatar
balo
Posts: 47563
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 10:47 pm
Location: Akoko Highlands

Re: Nabil Fekir to Liverpool

Post by balo »

cchinukw wrote:At this rate, we may as well surrender the Premier League title to Liverpool for the next 5 years and just turn up.

Thread was started before the start of this season. Fekir didn't make it to Anfield.
If Noah had been truly wise, he would have swatted those two flies. -- Helen Castle

http://i42.tinypic.com/210hk01.jpg
User avatar
Chief Ogbunigwe
Posts: 40548
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 2:35 pm
Location: Somewhere

Re: Nabil Fekir to Liverpool

Post by Chief Ogbunigwe »

balo wrote:
cchinukw wrote:At this rate, we may as well surrender the Premier League title to Liverpool for the next 5 years and just turn up.

Thread was started before the start of this season. Fekir didn't make it to Anfield.

you dey mind my Arsenal brother? Let Pool sign him if they like....they can't play more than 11 at a time anyhow. Arsenal can throw in the towel if they like. I know the scouts and moneybags at Chelsea, City and Man U are not going to sleep and watch Pool dominate.
AFCON 2019 sweet o
Barren for 37 yrs no good o

New member and Titled Chief, Distant Gunners Consortium.
"This is an island surrounded by water, big water, ocean water."
Post Reply