Page 1 of 1

NFF DON HAMMER

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:00 pm
by 1naija

The North American bid’s signature selling point, however, was delivered in a language FIFA members long have understood: revenue. The North Americans promised FIFA a record $11 billion profit — a staggering amount of money that could mean as much as $50 million for each national association.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/06/13/s ... rocco.html

Re: NFF DON HAMMER

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:01 pm
by 1naija
Next few NFF elections will be war.

Re: NFF DON HAMMER

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:22 pm
by pajimoh
Junior egghead is already being groomed by current NFF shiaman to take over in 2026.

Re: NFF DON HAMMER

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:35 pm
by Kako
Kai! Nyntakyi don miss :P

Re: NFF DON HAMMER

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:44 pm
by Odas
1naija wrote:

The North American bid’s signature selling point, however, was delivered in a language FIFA members long have understood: revenue. The North Americans promised FIFA a record $11 billion profit — a staggering amount of money that could mean as much as $50 million for each national association.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/06/13/s ... rocco.html
... yeah, they promised, but did not guarantee it. However, even if they deliver as promised, are we not setting a bad precedent? How many countries or regions can deliver such revenue to FIFA in future? Does it mean ONLY the RICH nations or parts of the world will be hosting FIFA's World cup tournaments based on this USA/CANADA/MEXICO'S win?

Re: NFF DON HAMMER

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:47 pm
by tfco
Kako wrote:Kai! Nyntakyi don miss :P
watch and see

he could be FIFA VP by then

Re: NFF DON HAMMER

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:55 pm
by Kako
tfco wrote:
Kako wrote:Kai! Nyntakyi don miss :P
watch and see

he could be FIFA VP by then
:scared: The type of people FIFA likes, they promote the "game" :mrgreen:

Re: NFF DON HAMMER

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:09 pm
by 1naija
Odas wrote:
1naija wrote:

The North American bid’s signature selling point, however, was delivered in a language FIFA members long have understood: revenue. The North Americans promised FIFA a record $11 billion profit — a staggering amount of money that could mean as much as $50 million for each national association.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/06/13/s ... rocco.html
... yeah, they promised, but did not guarantee it. However, even if they deliver as promised, are we not setting a bad precedent? How many countries or regions can deliver such revenue to FIFA in future? Does it mean ONLY the RICH nations or parts of the world will be hosting FIFA's World cup tournaments based on this USA/CANADA/MEXICO'S win?
The flip side of the argument is, poorer nations need the money to develop and grow their football. While this gives advantage to rich countries to host the tournament, the game need to be developed across the globe to give access to tiny nations that don't have the resources to do so themselves.

I think Africa should learn from North America and tender joint bids next time. I think it was actually a blessing to Morocco that they didnt win. There is no way they could have built the necessary infrastructure for the tournament in 8 years.

Re: NFF DON HAMMER

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:47 pm
by Gotti
Odas wrote:... yeah, they promised, but did not guarantee it. However, even if they deliver as promised, are we not setting a bad precedent? How many countries or regions can deliver such revenue to FIFA in future? Does it mean ONLY the RICH nations or parts of the world will be hosting FIFA's World cup tournaments based on this USA/CANADA/MEXICO'S win?
Have no issues with that at all...
Poor nations should be putting their resources into far more crucial stuff - their people, for starters!

Re: NFF DON HAMMER

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 8:03 pm
by anikulapo
Kako wrote:Kai! Nyntakyi don miss :P
:shock: :oops: :oops:

Re: NFF DON HAMMER

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 8:16 pm
by Waffiman
1naija wrote:

The North American bid’s signature selling point, however, was delivered in a language FIFA members long have understood: revenue. The North Americans promised FIFA a record $11 billion profit — a staggering amount of money that could mean as much as $50 million for each national association.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/06/13/s ... rocco.html
This is why they will win it easy.

Re: NFF DON HAMMER

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 8:55 pm
by Gotti
Waffiman wrote:
1naija wrote:

The North American bid’s signature selling point, however, was delivered in a language FIFA members long have understood: revenue. The North Americans promised FIFA a record $11 billion profit — a staggering amount of money that could mean as much as $50 million for each national association.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/06/13/s ... rocco.html
This is why they will win it easy.
Bros, just waking up? They already did!

Re: NFF DON HAMMER

Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 9:12 pm
by Rawlings
Kako wrote:Kai! Nyntakyi don miss :P
who is he? :???:

Re: NFF DON HAMMER

Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2018 2:19 pm
by Waffiman
Gotti wrote:
Waffiman wrote:
1naija wrote:

The North American bid’s signature selling point, however, was delivered in a language FIFA members long have understood: revenue. The North Americans promised FIFA a record $11 billion profit — a staggering amount of money that could mean as much as $50 million for each national association.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/06/13/s ... rocco.html
This is why they will win it easy.
Bros, just waking up? They already did!
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Sorry, wanted to write, 'won it' easy.

In a rush and did not proof read.

Re: NFF DON HAMMER

Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2018 2:21 pm
by YemiBrazil
Gotti wrote:
Odas wrote:... yeah, they promised, but did not guarantee it. However, even if they deliver as promised, are we not setting a bad precedent? How many countries or regions can deliver such revenue to FIFA in future? Does it mean ONLY the RICH nations or parts of the world will be hosting FIFA's World cup tournaments based on this USA/CANADA/MEXICO'S win?
Have no issues with that at all...
Poor nations should be putting their resources into far more crucial stuff - their people, for starters!
KPOM!