SUPER FALCONS 1 (Oparanozie) vs CANADA 2 (FT)
Moderators: Moderator Team, phpBB2 - Administrators
Re: SUPER FALCONS 1 (Oparanozie) vs CANADA 2 (2H)
Keep up the good work Gotti.Gotti wrote:Was about to note that the addition of Oshoala and Ordega will significantly upgrade the team...Adisboy wrote:Nigeria far from full strenght, no Oshoala, no Ordega, no Payne. At least Canada's top stars entered in the second half while ours were unavailable for various reasons.Oguleftie wrote:Canada is not at full strength, their captain is not in.
Even then do not read any meaning into the ranking. Canada is not as good as the ranking.
By the way Falcons has always beaten Canada; their best has been to force a draw.
Very happy about Payne, but we really don’t know how she’ll fit in - until the Austrian pre-WC camp.
What a pity. First time Canada has beaten Falcons.
Re: SUPER FALCONS 1 (Oparanozie) vs CANADA 2 (2H)
Really?
They just beat the #3 ranked team in the world (England) on Friday 1-0.
This shows they might actually be better than their ranking.
They just beat the #3 ranked team in the world (England) on Friday 1-0.
This shows they might actually be better than their ranking.
Oguleftie wrote:I said ......"Even then do not read any meaning into the ranking. Canada is not as good as the ranking" .....Adisboy wrote:Nigeria far from full strenght, no Oshoala, no Ordega, no Payne. At least Canada's top stars entered in the second half while ours were unavailable for various reasons.Oguleftie wrote:Canada is not at full strength, their captain is not in.
Even then do not read any meaning into the ranking. Canada is not as good as the ranking.
By the way Falcons has always beaten Canada; their best has been to force a draw.
Re: SUPER FALCONS 1 (Oparanozie) vs CANADA 2 (2H)
Yes believe it. Do not forget that other countries not previously in women football have recently come in to join the party; countries like Spain, Netherlands, etc, etc, etc who were never in world tournaments are likely going to kick the FIFA ranking door down.Otitokoro wrote:Really?
They just beat the #3 ranked team in the world (England) on Friday 1-0.
This shows they might actually be better than their ranking.Oguleftie wrote:I said ......"Even then do not read any meaning into the ranking. Canada is not as good as the ranking" .....Adisboy wrote:Nigeria far from full strenght, no Oshoala, no Ordega, no Payne. At least Canada's top stars entered in the second half while ours were unavailable for various reasons.Oguleftie wrote:Canada is not at full strength, their captain is not in.
Even then do not read any meaning into the ranking. Canada is not as good as the ranking.
By the way Falcons has always beaten Canada; their best has been to force a draw.
Re: SUPER FALCONS 1 (Oparanozie) vs CANADA 2 (FT)
Remember that in 1999 when Falcons were playing in the knockout stages of the WWC, countries like England, Canada, etc were nowhere to be found.
And when England & Canada etc later came around Spain, Netherlands etc were nowhere to be found.
Now give that a thought.
And when England & Canada etc later came around Spain, Netherlands etc were nowhere to be found.
Now give that a thought.
- Bigpokey24
- Super Eagle
- Posts: 110878
- Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2003 4:58 pm
- Location: Earth
Re: SUPER FALCONS 1 (Oparanozie) vs CANADA 2 (FT)
what's your point? Do you know how much money those countries invest in the women game? When will you invest in women football back home?Oguleftie wrote:Remember that in 1999 when Falcons were playing in the knockout stages of the WWC, countries like England, Canada, etc were nowhere to be found.
And when England & Canada etc later came around Spain, Netherlands etc were nowhere to be found.
Now give that a thought.
SuperEagles
© Bigpokey24, most loved on CE
My post are with no warranties and confers zero rights. Get out your feelings
It is not authorized by CyberEagles. You assume all risk for your use.
All rights aren't reserved
© Bigpokey24, most loved on CE
My post are with no warranties and confers zero rights. Get out your feelings
It is not authorized by CyberEagles. You assume all risk for your use.
All rights aren't reserved
Re: SUPER FALCONS 1 (Oparanozie) vs CANADA 2 (FT)
Your argument is based on the presumption that the likes of the US, England, France have been stagnant over the last decade or so (which is clearly not the case).
The current top 15 according to the latest FIFA ranking is as follows: US, Germany, England, France, Canada, Australia, Japan, Netherlands, Sweden, Brazil, Korea DPR, Norway, Spain, Korea Rep and Italy.
I would argue that these same teams (save for China) have been in the top 10 teams over the last decade or 2.
The likelihood of a 'random' team outside of those 15 winning the world cup or creating a 'shock' is slim, if not remote.
The current top 15 according to the latest FIFA ranking is as follows: US, Germany, England, France, Canada, Australia, Japan, Netherlands, Sweden, Brazil, Korea DPR, Norway, Spain, Korea Rep and Italy.
I would argue that these same teams (save for China) have been in the top 10 teams over the last decade or 2.
The likelihood of a 'random' team outside of those 15 winning the world cup or creating a 'shock' is slim, if not remote.
Oguleftie wrote:Remember that in 1999 when Falcons were playing in the knockout stages of the WWC, countries like England, Canada, etc were nowhere to be found.
And when England & Canada etc later came around Spain, Netherlands etc were nowhere to be found.
Now give that a thought.
Re: SUPER FALCONS 1 (Oparanozie) vs CANADA 2 (FT)
You are misunderstanding.Otitokoro wrote:Your argument is based on the presumption that the likes of the US, England, France have been stagnant over the last decade or so (which is clearly not the case).
The current top 15 according to the latest FIFA ranking is as follows: US, Germany, England, France, Canada, Australia, Japan, Netherlands, Sweden, Brazil, Korea DPR, Norway, Spain, Korea Rep and Italy.
I would argue that these same teams (save for China) have been in the top 10 teams over the last decade or 2.
The likelihood of a 'random' team outside of those 15 winning the world cup or creating a 'shock' is slim, if not remote.
Oguleftie wrote:Remember that in 1999 when Falcons were playing in the knockout stages of the WWC, countries like England, Canada, etc were nowhere to be found.
And when England & Canada etc later came around Spain, Netherlands etc were nowhere to be found.
Now give that a thought.
That is not my argument; read it again.
Answer the 1999 question first.
- tfco
- Eagle
- Posts: 76158
- Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2005 6:49 pm
- Location: Accra, Old Trafford, Takoradi, Canada
- Contact:
Re: SUPER FALCONS 1 (Oparanozie) vs CANADA 2 (FT)
AFCON 2024 L-O-S-E-R-S
They did not CEDIS coming
Naira Did We
Re: SUPER FALCONS 1 (Oparanozie) vs CANADA 2 (FT)
1999 is not a decade ago.Oguleftie wrote:You are misunderstanding.Otitokoro wrote:Your argument is based on the presumption that the likes of the US, England, France have been stagnant over the last decade or so (which is clearly not the case).
The current top 15 according to the latest FIFA ranking is as follows: US, Germany, England, France, Canada, Australia, Japan, Netherlands, Sweden, Brazil, Korea DPR, Norway, Spain, Korea Rep and Italy.
I would argue that these same teams (save for China) have been in the top 10 teams over the last decade or 2.
The likelihood of a 'random' team outside of those 15 winning the world cup or creating a 'shock' is slim, if not remote.
Oguleftie wrote:Remember that in 1999 when Falcons were playing in the knockout stages of the WWC, countries like England, Canada, etc were nowhere to be found.
And when England & Canada etc later came around Spain, Netherlands etc were nowhere to be found.
Now give that a thought.
That is not my argument; read it again.
Answer the 1999 question first.
- TonyTheTigerKiller
- Eaglet
- Posts: 12414
- Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 7:55 pm
Re: SUPER FALCONS 1 (Oparanozie) vs CANADA 2 (FT)
I am not certain about the usefulness of these matches. The only thing we seem to be learning from them is that we can’t beat oyibo teams
Cheers.
Cheers.