Cybereagles

The Undisputed Number One Home for All Super Eagles Fans
It is currently Tue Oct 15, 2019 2:23 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 8:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 4:08 pm
Posts: 11886
Location: seattle
obviously when you foul someone inside 18 if it gets called - it results in penalty and often yellow card.

under the same theory if a striker fouls a defender inside the 18 and gets a yellow a penalty kick should be awarded to the defenders team against the offenders team.
why should strikers be the only victims deserving award of penalty since both offences occur inside the 18 like when that french girl kicked ebi and got yellow whereas had ebi been the offender it would had been penalty against us.
There is no logic enough to defend this injustice against defenders

_________________
make peaceful change impossible make violent change inevitable.

"It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the--if he--if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not--that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement....Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 8:48 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 03, 2004 5:04 pm
Posts: 45709
You are a genius for only you to think about such rubbish. :mad: :???:


Murds, where is the weed smoking emoticons?

_________________
The Lord is my Shephard. I shall not be in want.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 8:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 10:39 am
Posts: 17594
1naija wrote:
You are a genius for only you to think about such rubbish. :mad: :???:


Murds, where is the weed smoking emoticons?


See what joblessness can do. The man needs to find a gaddem JOB. :rotf: :rotf: :rotf:

_________________
OCCUPY NFF!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 9:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 6:16 pm
Posts: 14149
jette1 wrote:
obviously when you foul someone inside 18 if it gets called - it results in penalty and often yellow card.

under the same theory if a striker fouls a defender inside the 18 and gets a yellow a penalty kick should be awarded to the defenders team against the offenders team.
why should strikers be the only victims deserving award of penalty since both offences occur inside the 18 like when that french girl kicked ebi and got yellow whereas had ebi been the offender it would had been penalty against us.
There is no logic enough to defend this injustice against defenders


Just Wow :shock:

_________________
"Learn from others whom have walked the path before you, but be smart enough to know when to cut your own trail."

You either die as a good poster, or live long enough to become the troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 9:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 1:09 pm
Posts: 21861
Location: NORTH AMERICA
jette1 wrote:
obviously when you foul someone inside 18 if it gets called - it results in penalty and often yellow card.

under the same theory if a striker fouls a defender inside the 18 and gets a yellow a penalty kick should be awarded to the defenders team against the offenders team.
why should strikers be the only victims deserving award of penalty since both offences occur inside the 18 like when that french girl kicked ebi and got yellow whereas had ebi been the offender it would had been penalty against us.
There is no logic enough to defend this injustice against defenders

How about the players also giving the officials yellow and red card whenever they make mistakes? . Nwanne, I'm seriously worried about your sanity. It is well oooo.

_________________
Nancy Pelosi: " I'll rather see Trump in prison than impeached"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 9:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 4:08 pm
Posts: 11886
Location: seattle
Ekorian wrote:
jette1 wrote:
obviously when you foul someone inside 18 if it gets called - it results in penalty and often yellow card.

under the same theory if a striker fouls a defender inside the 18 and gets a yellow a penalty kick should be awarded to the defenders team against the offenders team.
why should strikers be the only victims deserving award of penalty since both offences occur inside the 18 like when that french girl kicked ebi and got yellow whereas had ebi been the offender it would had been penalty against us.
There is no logic enough to defend this injustice against defenders

How about the players also giving the officials yellow and red card whenever they make mistakes? . Nwanne, I'm seriously worried about your sanity. It is well oooo.



it's not surprising that you cant see pass the blindfold its perfectly normal after a life time with it on

_________________
make peaceful change impossible make violent change inevitable.

"It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the--if he--if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not--that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement....Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true."


Last edited by jette1 on Fri Jun 21, 2019 9:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 9:28 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 2:01 am
Posts: 38213
Location: Eagles' Nest
jette1 wrote:
obviously when you foul someone inside 18 if it gets called - it results in penalty and often yellow card.

under the same theory if a striker fouls a defender inside the 18 and gets a yellow a penalty kick should be awarded to the defenders team against the offenders team.
why should strikers be the only victims deserving award of penalty since both offences occur inside the 18 like when that french girl kicked ebi and got yellow whereas had ebi been the offender it would had been penalty against us.
There is no logic enough to defend this injustice against defenders

Baba I have said it before and will say it again, you too do and you need to calm down. Haba!

_________________
Image
DEM GO HEAR WEN!!! © Robbynice

We don't all have to serve or even honor the call to serve but don't boo those that choose to honor the call to serve...© Cellular 2009

"I do not think I know everything about football but I have massive experience." - Arsene Wenger


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 9:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 4:08 pm
Posts: 11886
Location: seattle
Robbynice wrote:
jette1 wrote:
obviously when you foul someone inside 18 if it gets called - it results in penalty and often yellow card.

under the same theory if a striker fouls a defender inside the 18 and gets a yellow a penalty kick should be awarded to the defenders team against the offenders team.
why should strikers be the only victims deserving award of penalty since both offences occur inside the 18 like when that french girl kicked ebi and got yellow whereas had ebi been the offender it would had been penalty against us.
There is no logic enough to defend this injustice against defenders

Baba I have said it before and will say it again, you too do and you need to calm down. Haba!

I'm on vacation dude got plenty time on hand

_________________
make peaceful change impossible make violent change inevitable.

"It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the--if he--if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not--that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement....Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 9:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2003 5:14 pm
Posts: 13281
Location: USA
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 21, 2019 10:55 pm 
Online

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 7:48 pm
Posts: 13375
jette1 wrote:
Robbynice wrote:
jette1 wrote:
obviously when you foul someone inside 18 if it gets called - it results in penalty and often yellow card.

under the same theory if a striker fouls a defender inside the 18 and gets a yellow a penalty kick should be awarded to the defenders team against the offenders team.
why should strikers be the only victims deserving award of penalty since both offences occur inside the 18 like when that french girl kicked ebi and got yellow whereas had ebi been the offender it would had been penalty against us.
There is no logic enough to defend this injustice against defenders

Baba I have said it before and will say it again, you too do and you need to calm down. Haba!

I'm on vacation dude got plenty time on hand


You should spend your vacation wisely. perhaps, busy yourself between the legs of a woman?

_________________
metalalloy wrote:
Does the SE have Gray, Mahrez or Albrighton on our team or players of their caliber?


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2019 12:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:35 am
Posts: 7711
Based on your Ajegule logic, should a penalty be awarded against an attacker who handles the ball in the opposing team's penalty box?

_________________
Akpeyi -- V. Moses, TroostEkong, Omeruo, s. Atanda --- Ndidi, Mikel, Nwakaeme -- Chukwueze, Onyekuru, Osimhen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2019 12:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:32 pm
Posts: 31030
jette1 wrote:
obviously when you foul someone inside 18 if it gets called - it results in penalty and often yellow card.

under the same theory if a striker fouls a defender inside the 18 and gets a yellow a penalty kick should be awarded to the defenders team against the offenders team.
why should strikers be the only victims deserving award of penalty since both offences occur inside the 18 like when that french girl kicked ebi and got yellow whereas had ebi been the offender it would had been penalty against us.
There is no logic enough to defend this injustice against defenders

Baba in heaven, is it too much to ask? Please find him anoda forum, we don tire for his mata :| :? :cry: :atc:

_________________
Super Eagles - Fly Above The Storm!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2019 1:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 4:08 pm
Posts: 11886
Location: seattle
Rawlings wrote:
Based on your Ajegule logic, should a penalty be awarded against an attacker who handles the ball in the opposing team's penalty box?


yes
otherwise justify for me why a defender should bear more loss than an attacker for the same offense or vice vasa. reality is when inside a bubble you don't really know it. we have gotten use to same thing and cant see pass that

_________________
make peaceful change impossible make violent change inevitable.

"It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the--if he--if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not--that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement....Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2019 6:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 9:35 am
Posts: 7711
jette1 wrote:
Rawlings wrote:
Based on your Ajegule logic, should a penalty be awarded against an attacker who handles the ball in the opposing team's penalty box?


yes
otherwise justify for me why a defender should bear more loss than an attacker for the same offense or vice vasa. reality is when inside a bubble you don't really know it. we have gotten use to same thing and cant see pass that


Because, in soccer, the "punishment" takes place at the place or the vicinity of the "crime"

_________________
Akpeyi -- V. Moses, TroostEkong, Omeruo, s. Atanda --- Ndidi, Mikel, Nwakaeme -- Chukwueze, Onyekuru, Osimhen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 22, 2019 8:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 4:08 pm
Posts: 11886
Location: seattle
Rawlings wrote:
jette1 wrote:
Rawlings wrote:
Based on your Ajegule logic, should a penalty be awarded against an attacker who handles the ball in the opposing team's penalty box?


yes
otherwise justify for me why a defender should bear more loss than an attacker for the same offense or vice vasa. reality is when inside a bubble you don't really know it. we have gotten use to same thing and cant see pass that


Because, in soccer, the "punishment" takes place at the place or the vicinity of the "crime"


the vicinity in relation to given violation can be mutually exclusive and even so goal keepers could be switched. Football as we know it could be even more interesting than it already is. VAR is already opening up football to a range of possibilities and perhaps adaptations,

_________________
make peaceful change impossible make violent change inevitable.

"It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the--if he--if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not--that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement....Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 12:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 12:51 am
Posts: 2753
jette1 wrote:
obviously when you foul someone inside 18 if it gets called - it results in penalty and often yellow card.

under the same theory if a striker fouls a defender inside the 18 and gets a yellow a penalty kick should be awarded to the defenders team against the offenders team.
why should strikers be the only victims deserving award of penalty since both offences occur inside the 18 like when that french girl kicked ebi and got yellow whereas had ebi been the offender it would had been penalty against us.
There is no logic enough to defend this injustice against defenders

,

Hmm but in one case the defender is stopping an attacker from scoring (as the current rules are) whilst the other scenario, the attacker is just bored and decides to sit on a defender, who is miles away from the opposition box ( your suggestion) and has no chance scoring when fouled. Or am I getting this theory wrong?


Last edited by uglyoneiamagain on Sun Jun 23, 2019 9:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 12:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 6:16 pm
Posts: 14149
uglyoneiamagain wrote:
jette1 wrote:
obviously when you foul someone inside 18 if it gets called - it results in penalty and often yellow card.

under the same theory if a striker fouls a defender inside the 18 and gets a yellow a penalty kick should be awarded to the defenders team against the offenders team.
why should strikers be the only victims deserving award of penalty since both offences occur inside the 18 like when that french girl kicked ebi and got yellow whereas had ebi been the offender it would had been penalty against us.
There is no logic enough to defend this injustice against defenders

,

Hmm but in once case the defender is stopping an attacker from scoring (as the current rules are) whilst the other scenario, the attacker is just bored and decides to sit on a defender, who is miles away from the opposition box ( your suggestion) and has no chance scoring when fouled. Or am I getting this theory wrong?


I think you are missing the genius value in his suggestion :D He mearnt if the foul happens in one 18, take it to the offending ,attacker’s, 18 and kick the penalty. Or better yet play the penalty from the defending teams 18 and bring the other keeper over to try to stop it and resume with the keeper going back to his post on the other side of the field.

Confused? Nah wait until you hear the other option. If an attacker fouls in defenders 18, play a penalty on the penalty spot of the defender while aiming for the attackers goal post on the other side of the field. All players bar keepers should leave the field of play to avoid encroachment. That’s the best version of this suggestion. 8-) 8-)

_________________
"Learn from others whom have walked the path before you, but be smart enough to know when to cut your own trail."

You either die as a good poster, or live long enough to become the troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 23, 2019 12:26 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 11:02 pm
Posts: 7540
jette1 wrote:
obviously when you foul someone inside 18 if it gets called - it results in penalty and often yellow card.

under the same theory if a striker fouls a defender inside the 18 and gets a yellow a penalty kick should be awarded to the defenders team against the offenders team.
why should strikers be the only victims deserving award of penalty since both offences occur inside the 18 like when that french girl kicked ebi and got yellow whereas had ebi been the offender it would had been penalty against us.
There is no logic enough to defend this injustice against defenders


Many people have & still do.

They just let go of these kinds of thoughts once they become sober.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 1naija, Bing [Bot] and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group