Re: [GRP D] URU 2 {Suarez} V ENG 1 {Rooney} (2H)
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 10:31 pm
Super Eagles to super eagusi.cito us wrote:From 3 lions to 3 kittens.
Indomitable Lions to little Whiny Kitten.
This World Cup sweet no be small.
The Undisputed Number One Home for All Super Eagles Fans
https://forum.cybereagles.com/
Super Eagles to super eagusi.cito us wrote:From 3 lions to 3 kittens.
Indomitable Lions to little Whiny Kitten.
This World Cup sweet no be small.
shoot! lol! what were the odds on the Emenike golden boot?Coach wrote:@Ugly, the untorn slips remain Benzema golden boot, Emenike golden boot, France world champions. Emmanuel was supposed to chop hat trick vs Iran, instead he wan barge players a like the main market barrow boy minus the uzo uzo!!! If none of the above come through, reckleness will be the charge and one will bet on a successful conviction. Film tricked.
Coach wrote:20/1...ordinary Iran and e be like say Ayatollah Baresi dey for field. Cowards.
bamenda boy wrote:Make God no punish you. So 4 -0 was not a disgrace enough for you?charlie wrote:Someone explain how England gets 5 mins and Cameroon barely got 4 mins>?
ohsee wrote:Whatever the case, game lived up to cracking expectations, and I WISH I HAD BEEN ABLE TO GET A TICKET!!!!!
Whatever you think about Suarez--and people should shut up with that racism thing--the bobo is a striker and half. Our useless forwards should do well to copy. In spite of all the tight marking the Ingerlunders gave him, he still managed to break free to score. When do Brazil have to meet Uru? I am sure that with every Uruguay win, every Brazilian is rushing to the bathroom to ba nshi oku (ask your Igbo friends) Brazilians know Uruguay to be their worst nighmare, and visions of 1950 will be dancing in their heads as they sit on the throne.
Hmm you may just wanna place a bet on that would be so sad if they did though.Coach wrote:If England qualify with two defeats...tufiakwah!!!
mmeny wrote:In your co-ed league abi Dude it is not definitive that if he did what you just said the ball still won't have found the back of the netSylverEagles wrote:Of course I've never played a world cup game before and against world class strikers but I've played in competitive games as a goalkeeper and I'm not saying it is an easy save but the great goalkeepers come up with saves like that and I've saved hot shots before with everything - face, torso - everything!!!mmeny wrote:The most vocal ones on SE, have never played any competitive games before in their lives.Chief Ogbunigwe wrote:Looks like many never played the game seriously before....they think strikers gently stroke the ball at keepers.green4life wrote:Lol. U dey mind am. Intense bullet. He did well to move an inch.anointed wrote:Save wetin?SylverEagles wrote:Hart should be saving that!! Sometimes you need your goalkeeper to make a super save!!! He just had to stay big there.
Bros, most countries will win the world cup one day, one day. The question is, will it happen today or in the year 26,514?Cally wrote:So sad for England. Just a pity they still have some kind of mental block in these tournaments. This upcoming generation will change that, I'm very sure.
On a side note, these yeye Chelsea groupies, like PaJ, are blaming Hart and Gerrard as if they caused the goal. They deliberately failed to notice that Cahill allowed Suarez a yard that turned out to be a devastating mistake. Cahill was as culpable, if not more, for that goal. Gerrard only had an unfortunate bounce of his head in an attempt to block Cavani's header.
The English will get it right with time.
Prof., Uruguay is a different team with Suarez.ohsee wrote:Whatever the case, game lived up to cracking expectations, and I WISH I HAD BEEN ABLE TO GET A TICKET!!!!!
Whatever you think about Suarez--and people should shut up with that racism thing--the bobo is a striker and half. Our useless forwards should do well to copy. In spite of all the tight marking the Ingerlunders gave him, he still managed to break free to score. When do Brazil have to meet Uru? I am sure that with every Uruguay win, every Brazilian is rushing to the bathroom to ba nshi oku (ask your Igbo friends) Brazilians know Uruguay to be their worst nighmare, and visions of 1950 will be dancing in their heads as they sit on the throne.
They also see we couldn't beat common Iran WITH Emenike, Moses and Onazi.Cellular wrote:Prof., Uruguay is a different team with Suarez.ohsee wrote:Whatever the case, game lived up to cracking expectations, and I WISH I HAD BEEN ABLE TO GET A TICKET!!!!!
Whatever you think about Suarez--and people should shut up with that racism thing--the bobo is a striker and half. Our useless forwards should do well to copy. In spite of all the tight marking the Ingerlunders gave him, he still managed to break free to score. When do Brazil have to meet Uru? I am sure that with every Uruguay win, every Brazilian is rushing to the bathroom to ba nshi oku (ask your Igbo friends) Brazilians know Uruguay to be their worst nighmare, and visions of 1950 will be dancing in their heads as they sit on the throne.
It affects how you line up and how you play them.
Funny thing is that folks who went on and on about how we couldn't beat common Uruguay without Emenike, Moses and Onazi can now see that they are not easy customers with Suarez playing...
Henderson is bettertmex12 wrote:How come Milner has not been used?
They defended better against England but I'm sure that's all on Suarez.Cellular wrote:Prof., Uruguay is a different team with Suarez.ohsee wrote:Whatever the case, game lived up to cracking expectations, and I WISH I HAD BEEN ABLE TO GET A TICKET!!!!!
Whatever you think about Suarez--and people should shut up with that racism thing--the bobo is a striker and half. Our useless forwards should do well to copy. In spite of all the tight marking the Ingerlunders gave him, he still managed to break free to score. When do Brazil have to meet Uru? I am sure that with every Uruguay win, every Brazilian is rushing to the bathroom to ba nshi oku (ask your Igbo friends) Brazilians know Uruguay to be their worst nighmare, and visions of 1950 will be dancing in their heads as they sit on the throne.
It affects how you line up and how you play them.
Funny thing is that folks who went on and on about how we couldn't beat common Uruguay without Emenike, Moses and Onazi can now see that they are not easy customers with Suarez playing...
Chief Ogbunigwe wrote:
Silver:
I also kept goal competitively (college), and was not bad at it. I saved hot shots from close range, and also conceded my fair share. I faced those who thought they were strikers, and faced those who KNEW they were strikers. A striker of Suarez's caliber will only miss such a goal by their own fault or miscalculation. Conversely, a GK will only save such a shot from such a quality striker by being lucky/successfully gambling.
A striker running at you full speed with the ball, at close range holds ALL the aces. Kinda like PKs. Anything a good GK does in that situation is an intelligent gamble, but a gamble nonetheless! Suarez is an assassin. After firing at you at close range, as a KG, you stand up, go and pick the ball from your net and shake your head.
What about Uruguay that are not going home....yet? And what happens when they eventually have to go home? Who gets the blame on either occasions?wanaj0 wrote:England going home! I blame Keshi and GEJ for this
Ehem i dont think it was Cahill although it was Cahill who reacted quickest of all the defenders. Surarez peeled off the left shoulder of Jaglieka, who did not even know that Suarez had used him for sushi. The yard in space you saw was because Cahil was chasing a lost cause. If Jaglieka had been aware of what was going on around him, he would have spotted Suarez playing monkey in the shadow with him.Cally wrote:So sad for England. Just a pity they still have some kind of mental block in these tournaments. This upcoming generation will change that, I'm very sure.
On a side note, these yeye Chelsea groupies, like PaJ, are blaming Hart and Gerrard as if they caused the goal. They deliberately failed to notice that Cahill allowed Suarez a yard that turned out to be a devastating mistake. Cahill was as culpable, if not more, for that goal. Gerrard only had an unfortunate bounce of his head in an attempt to block Cavani's header.
The English will get it right with time.
IF he had played Milner....people would be shouting Henderson is better..like Ebenezer Obey sang, there is nothing you can do to satisfy people. Henderson had a better season than Milner..i have heard Milner called all manner of names from donkey to a Carmel. The question is did Henderson do enough to be on the field? If yes ..then people should let the case go.Riche007 wrote:Henderson is bettertmex12 wrote:How come Milner has not been used?
Id!ot Hodgson bought the Liverpool hype.