Cybereagles

The Undisputed Number One Home for All Super Eagles Fans
It is currently Mon Jun 17, 2019 6:09 am

All times are UTC + 1 hour




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: RSA 1 vs 0 KOR
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2019 8:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 4:08 pm
Posts: 11378
Location: seattle
This Mexican Ref is applying common sense rather than enslaving himself to VAR which it think has gotten out of control

_________________
make peaceful change impossible make violent change inevitable.

"It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the--if he--if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not--that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement....Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RSA 1 vs 0 KOR
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2019 9:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 5:46 pm
Posts: 58890
They overturned a penalty against Nigeria yesterday by looking at a marginal offside call that had no influence on the foul in the box.

_________________
Winners do it the right way.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kimbo5c0Ak

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMAchpi46lA


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RSA 1 vs 0 KOR
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2019 10:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 7:43 pm
Posts: 19770
Location: Cyberspace
In what alternate universe are you residing, jetti1?

_________________

I don suffa no be small
Upon say I get sense
Poverty no good at all o
Na him make I join dis business

- Osuofia - I Go Chop Your Dollar

Sinequanon - AKA shanequa - The autistic crybaby troll of CE. Whaaaa! Ah ain't talkin' to you no mo' cuz you hoit ma feelens :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RSA 1 vs 0 KOR
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2019 11:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 6:41 am
Posts: 37426
Location: Land of the Terrapins
ohenhen1 wrote:
They overturned a penalty against Nigeria yesterday by looking at a marginal offside call that had no influence on the foul in the box.


Yea it was offside before the foul in the box, that’s the right call.

_________________
Super Eagus 4 Life!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RSA 1 vs 0 KOR
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2019 11:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 4:54 pm
Posts: 10727
Location: Umuda-Isingwu

_________________
Then they said to one another, “We are truly guilty concerning our brother, for we saw the anguish of his soul when he pleaded with us, and we would not hear; therefore this distress has come upon us.” Genesis 42:21

“A doubtful friend is worse than a certain enemy. Let a man be one thing or the other, and we then know how to meet him” (Aesop, 620–564 BC).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RSA 1 vs 0 KOR
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2019 11:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 4:08 pm
Posts: 11378
Location: seattle
maceo4 wrote:
ohenhen1 wrote:
They overturned a penalty against Nigeria yesterday by looking at a marginal offside call that had no influence on the foul in the box.


Yea it was offside before the foul in the box, that’s the right call.


Your tunnel vision & loud mouth is too obvious; While video reviewing a current call which is an infraction you cannot then vacate the infraction and rewind the tape and simultaneously start reviewing other previous plays upon which no calls were made before current call especially when current call is an infraction against opponent player and not procedural because review would infringe on the present call being reviewed. Unless you are now saying if a players leg gets broken by slide tackle and VAR shows he was offsite before that then it’s his fault that his leg got broken.

_________________
make peaceful change impossible make violent change inevitable.

"It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the--if he--if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not--that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement....Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RSA 1 vs 0 KOR
PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2019 12:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 6:41 am
Posts: 37426
Location: Land of the Terrapins
jette1 wrote:
maceo4 wrote:
ohenhen1 wrote:
They overturned a penalty against Nigeria yesterday by looking at a marginal offside call that had no influence on the foul in the box.


Yea it was offside before the foul in the box, that’s the right call.


Your tunnel vision & loud mouth is too obvious; While video reviewing a current call which is an infraction you cannot then vacate the infraction and rewind the tape and simultaneously start reviewing other previous plays upon which no calls were made before current call especially when current call is an infraction against opponent player and not procedural because review would infringe on the present call being reviewed. Unless you are now saying if a players leg gets broken by slide tackle and VAR shows he was offsite before that then it’s his fault that his leg got broken.


What are you on about, that’s the whole point of VAR, they let marginal offside calls go and review based on the outcome of the play, but they allow the play to conclude then go back. Same way Argentina’s 3rd goal was chopped off. The result of our play being allowed to continue was a PK, and so was rightly brought back after review showed it was offside to begin with. They review the entire lead up to the conclusion of the play.

_________________
Super Eagus 4 Life!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RSA 1 vs 0 KOR
PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2019 2:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 4:08 pm
Posts: 11378
Location: seattle
maceo4 wrote:
jette1 wrote:
maceo4 wrote:
ohenhen1 wrote:
They overturned a penalty against Nigeria yesterday by looking at a marginal offside call that had no influence on the foul in the box.


Yea it was offside before the foul in the box, that’s the right call.


Your tunnel vision & loud mouth is too obvious; While video reviewing a current call which is an infraction you cannot then vacate the infraction and rewind the tape and simultaneously start reviewing other previous plays upon which no calls were made before current call especially when current call is an infraction against opponent player and not procedural because review would infringe on the present call being reviewed. Unless you are now saying if a players leg gets broken by slide tackle and VAR shows he was offsite before that then it’s his fault that his leg got broken.


What are you on about, that’s the whole point of VAR, they let marginal offside calls go and review based on the outcome of the play, but they allow the play to conclude then go back. Same way Argentina’s 3rd goal was chopped off. The result of our play being allowed to continue was a PK, and so was rightly brought back after review showed it was offside to begin with. They review the entire lead up to the conclusion of the play.

Is English your first or second language; let me spell it out in a non technical language for you
They cannot vacate a foul or a bodily harm on a player which just happened and was called appropriately . A goal was not scored on the missed offsite hence that sequence was finish. So was the player no longer brought down.

_________________
make peaceful change impossible make violent change inevitable.

"It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the--if he--if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not--that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement....Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: RSA 1 vs 0 KOR
PostPosted: Wed May 29, 2019 5:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 6:41 am
Posts: 37426
Location: Land of the Terrapins
jette1 wrote:
maceo4 wrote:
jette1 wrote:
maceo4 wrote:
ohenhen1 wrote:
They overturned a penalty against Nigeria yesterday by looking at a marginal offside call that had no influence on the foul in the box.


Yea it was offside before the foul in the box, that’s the right call.


Your tunnel vision & loud mouth is too obvious; While video reviewing a current call which is an infraction you cannot then vacate the infraction and rewind the tape and simultaneously start reviewing other previous plays upon which no calls were made before current call especially when current call is an infraction against opponent player and not procedural because review would infringe on the present call being reviewed. Unless you are now saying if a players leg gets broken by slide tackle and VAR shows he was offsite before that then it’s his fault that his leg got broken.


What are you on about, that’s the whole point of VAR, they let marginal offside calls go and review based on the outcome of the play, but they allow the play to conclude then go back. Same way Argentina’s 3rd goal was chopped off. The result of our play being allowed to continue was a PK, and so was rightly brought back after review showed it was offside to begin with. They review the entire lead up to the conclusion of the play.

Is English your first or second language; let me spell it out in a non technical language for you
They cannot vacate a foul or a bodily harm on a player which just happened and was called appropriately . A goal was not scored on the missed offsite hence that sequence was finish. So was the player no longer brought down.


You are not making any sense, any play that results after an offside and is reviewed by VAR is supposed to be brought back. Same way you say 'was the player no longer brought down', you can say 'was the goal no longer scored' abi? Who cares about the result of a play that was offsides to begin with? I mean why is this simple/straight forward concept so hard for you to understand?

Since English clearly is your second language please read the VAR handbook to get more understanding of how similar situations should be handled and stop yarning 'feelings':

https://www.knvb.nl/downloads/bestand/9 ... k-v8_final

Quote:
8.17 What happens if the VAR identifies a clear ‘missed’ penalty kick
but also an offside in the build-up to the missed penalty?
The VAR sees that the referee has made a clear error in not awarding a penalty kick but
there was also a clear ‘missed’ offside/handball in the attacking phase leading up to the
incident – what should the VAR do?
This is not easy but for the management of the game and to avoid unnecessary criticism
after the match, the referee should be informed of both situations at the next stoppage. The
referee then has 2 options depending on how ‘clear’ the missed penalty error was and the
state/atmosphere of the game:
• initiate a ‘review’ knowing it will result in a decision that there was an
offside/handball before the ‘missed’ penalty so no penalty is awarded (but everything
is clear to everyone) or
• inform the captain of the team that would have been awarded the penalty that there
was an offside/handball before the ‘penalty’ so the penalty would not have been
awarded (the 4th official would inform the coach and someone in VOR would inform
the broadcasters)

_________________
Super Eagus 4 Life!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group