Re: CHELSEA FOOTBALL CLUB 2019/2020 SEASON THREAD
Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2019 9:58 pm
Chelsea would have tried to hijack the Pepe deal to Arsenal if not for the transfer restrictions?
The Undisputed Number One Home for All Super Eagles Fans
https://forum.cybereagles.com/
ohenhen1 wrote:Chelsea would have tried to hijack the Pepe deal to Arsenal if not for the transfer restrictions?
Maybe. Maybe not. We will never know due to the transfer ban. I guess, lucky Arsenal then?ohenhen1 wrote:Chelsea would have tried to hijack the Pepe deal to Arsenal if not for the transfer restrictions?
Stop telling lieskalani JR wrote:Please note Frank Lampard getting outcoached by Marco Rose.
Chelsea started slowly but if you’re being honest you’d admit they were saved by Somer (gk). That said, the main positive is getting through the preseason without any additional injuries given RLC, CHO, Willian and Kanté have all been out.kalani JR wrote:Please note Frank Lampard getting outcoached by Marco Rose.
...out coached because Sommer is a good goalie and you longnamed goalie is crapkalani JR wrote:Please note Frank Lampard getting outcoached by Marco Rose.
Marco Rose is a better coach than Lampard will ever be. Not even close.kalani JR wrote:Please note Frank Lampard getting outcoached by Marco Rose.
...and he squandered 2 goal lead. Can't imagine if it were Rohr and the SE, na fire him right now.danfo driver wrote:Marco Rose is a better coach than Lampard will ever be. Not even close.kalani JR wrote:Please note Frank Lampard getting outcoached by Marco Rose.
This is what he has won as a coach---mcal wrote:...and he squandered 2 goal lead. Can't imagine if it were Rohr and the SE, na fire him right now.danfo driver wrote:Marco Rose is a better coach than Lampard will ever be. Not even close.kalani JR wrote:Please note Frank Lampard getting outcoached by Marco Rose.
...and after such 'impressive' resume/cv, he could not beat a novice coach. I shudderdanfo driver wrote:This is what he has won as a coach---mcal wrote:...and he squandered 2 goal lead. Can't imagine if it were Rohr and the SE, na fire him right now.danfo driver wrote:Marco Rose is a better coach than Lampard will ever be. Not even close.kalani JR wrote:Please note Frank Lampard getting outcoached by Marco Rose.
2 Austrian Bundesliga titles: (2017–18) and (2018–19)
1 Austrian Cup: (2018–19)
1 UEFA Youth League: (2016–17)
Please show me what Rohr and Lampard have won. Thanks.
Who is a "novice" coach? The one who failed in Div 2 last year? You can continue to "shudder" all you like, please list the trophies won by Lampard and Rohr! Thats all I have asked.mcal wrote:...and after such 'impressive' resume/cv, he could not beat a novice coach. I shudderdanfo driver wrote:This is what he has won as a coach---mcal wrote:...and he squandered 2 goal lead. Can't imagine if it were Rohr and the SE, na fire him right now.danfo driver wrote:Marco Rose is a better coach than Lampard will ever be. Not even close.kalani JR wrote:Please note Frank Lampard getting outcoached by Marco Rose.
2 Austrian Bundesliga titles: (2017–18) and (2018–19)
1 Austrian Cup: (2018–19)
1 UEFA Youth League: (2016–17)
Please show me what Rohr and Lampard have won. Thanks.
mcal wrote:...I weak for you.
A coach (Lampard) wey neva win nothing come 2 goals down to draw a match against a coach (your lord) wey don win everything earth and you dey laf as great achievement. I am confused
https://www.eurosport.com/football/prem ... tory.shtmlHe's still got to give Chelsea Champions League football. Just being Frank Lampard doesn't guarantee you anything, as much as some people seem to think it will give him time. It gives him a better chance than a new face like [Maurizio] Sarri.
If he loses two or three games, I don't think the fans are going to be cursing him as quickly as they did Sarri. He still wants a lot for his club, so he'll still believe that despite losing Eden Hazard, Chelsea should still get Champions League football, and that's what fans will expect.
For all the talk that Frank's going to bring through young players, he's still got senior players that make up a very good squad.
" Hazard going could be one of those things where players actually step out and show a bit more than they did before."
With Hazard there, a superstar capable of winning games on his own, some players took the easy route. Some players could shake the dust off themselves and produce a little bit more than they did before. It might make Chelsea more of a team than just a team with a very, very good individual.
top 4 and trophy, if not lamps is gone....Chelsea is all about winning.. I already have my #lampsputSenator WIRES wrote:Will Lampard be given time at Chelsea? Paul Parker asks!!
https://www.eurosport.com/football/prem ... tory.shtmlHe's still got to give Chelsea Champions League football. Just being Frank Lampard doesn't guarantee you anything, as much as some people seem to think it will give him time. It gives him a better chance than a new face like [Maurizio] Sarri.
If he loses two or three games, I don't think the fans are going to be cursing him as quickly as they did Sarri. He still wants a lot for his club, so he'll still believe that despite losing Eden Hazard, Chelsea should still get Champions League football, and that's what fans will expect.
For all the talk that Frank's going to bring through young players, he's still got senior players that make up a very good squad.
" Hazard going could be one of those things where players actually step out and show a bit more than they did before."
With Hazard there, a superstar capable of winning games on his own, some players took the easy route. Some players could shake the dust off themselves and produce a little bit more than they did before. It might make Chelsea more of a team than just a team with a very, very good individual.
Na yam? 4 trophies ko, 4 trophies ni.Bigpokey24 wrote:top 4 and trophy, if not lamps is gone....Chelsea is all about winning.. I already have my #lampsputSenator WIRES wrote:Will Lampard be given time at Chelsea? Paul Parker asks!!
https://www.eurosport.com/football/prem ... tory.shtmlHe's still got to give Chelsea Champions League football. Just being Frank Lampard doesn't guarantee you anything, as much as some people seem to think it will give him time. It gives him a better chance than a new face like [Maurizio] Sarri.
If he loses two or three games, I don't think the fans are going to be cursing him as quickly as they did Sarri. He still wants a lot for his club, so he'll still believe that despite losing Eden Hazard, Chelsea should still get Champions League football, and that's what fans will expect.
For all the talk that Frank's going to bring through young players, he's still got senior players that make up a very good squad.
" Hazard going could be one of those things where players actually step out and show a bit more than they did before."
With Hazard there, a superstar capable of winning games on his own, some players took the easy route. Some players could shake the dust off themselves and produce a little bit more than they did before. It might make Chelsea more of a team than just a team with a very, very good individual.
Chin-wuru-wuru, read what he said again. Dullard.cchinukw wrote:Na yam? 4 trophies ko, 4 trophies ni.Bigpokey24 wrote:top 4 and trophy, if not lamps is gone....Chelsea is all about winning.. I already have my #lampsputSenator WIRES wrote:Will Lampard be given time at Chelsea? Paul Parker asks!!
https://www.eurosport.com/football/prem ... tory.shtmlHe's still got to give Chelsea Champions League football. Just being Frank Lampard doesn't guarantee you anything, as much as some people seem to think it will give him time. It gives him a better chance than a new face like [Maurizio] Sarri.
If he loses two or three games, I don't think the fans are going to be cursing him as quickly as they did Sarri. He still wants a lot for his club, so he'll still believe that despite losing Eden Hazard, Chelsea should still get Champions League football, and that's what fans will expect.
For all the talk that Frank's going to bring through young players, he's still got senior players that make up a very good squad.
" Hazard going could be one of those things where players actually step out and show a bit more than they did before."
With Hazard there, a superstar capable of winning games on his own, some players took the easy route. Some players could shake the dust off themselves and produce a little bit more than they did before. It might make Chelsea more of a team than just a team with a very, very good individual.
Retard. How bori?danfo driver wrote:Chin-wuru-wuru, read what he said again. Dullard.cchinukw wrote:Na yam? 4 trophies ko, 4 trophies ni.Bigpokey24 wrote:top 4 and trophy, if not lamps is gone....Chelsea is all about winning.. I already have my #lampsputSenator WIRES wrote:Will Lampard be given time at Chelsea? Paul Parker asks!!
https://www.eurosport.com/football/prem ... tory.shtmlHe's still got to give Chelsea Champions League football. Just being Frank Lampard doesn't guarantee you anything, as much as some people seem to think it will give him time. It gives him a better chance than a new face like [Maurizio] Sarri.
If he loses two or three games, I don't think the fans are going to be cursing him as quickly as they did Sarri. He still wants a lot for his club, so he'll still believe that despite losing Eden Hazard, Chelsea should still get Champions League football, and that's what fans will expect.
For all the talk that Frank's going to bring through young players, he's still got senior players that make up a very good squad.
" Hazard going could be one of those things where players actually step out and show a bit more than they did before."
With Hazard there, a superstar capable of winning games on his own, some players took the easy route. Some players could shake the dust off themselves and produce a little bit more than they did before. It might make Chelsea more of a team than just a team with a very, very good individual.