Joao Felix.
Posted: Thu Aug 01, 2019 4:27 am
A very interesting player. He seems to be able to operate in a lot of roles.
The Undisputed Number One Home for All Super Eagles Fans
https://forum.cybereagles.com/
ATM sold Griez, Hernan and one the one City bought for 103, 89 and 70 millions .... they didn't even lose a dime after the purchase of FelixCally wrote:The young man seems not to be fazed by any opponent or occasion. He plays with a certain audacity that makes him destined to become a mega star. Atletico have wisely acquired him at this stage. They will likely make more than double what they paid for him within the next two to three years, unless they become super cash-rich themselves.
cchinukw wrote:Marko's thread merged with Yujam's.
Reason: Similar context.
Shows the laziness of those big clubs. Only like shiny things. Barca should've opted for him instead of Griezmann since they already had Coutinho who they never really have a decent chance.Bigpokey24 wrote:ATM sold Griez, Hernan and one the one City bought for 103, 89 and 70 millions .... they didn't even lose a dime after the purchase of FelixCally wrote:The young man seems not to be fazed by any opponent or occasion. He plays with a certain audacity that makes him destined to become a mega star. Atletico have wisely acquired him at this stage. They will likely make more than double what they paid for him within the next two to three years, unless they become super cash-rich themselves.
[/video]
This is poor analysis. Why would Barca pay 128 million euros for a child who has only performed in a backwater league, instead of 120 million Euros for an adult who has performed year in year out, for years IN THEIR LEAGUE?theYemster wrote:Shows the laziness of those big clubs. Only like shiny things. Barca should've opted for him instead of Griezmann since they already had Coutinho who they never really have a decent chance.Bigpokey24 wrote:ATM sold Griez, Hernan and one the one City bought for 103, 89 and 70 millions .... they didn't even lose a dime after the purchase of FelixCally wrote:The young man seems not to be fazed by any opponent or occasion. He plays with a certain audacity that makes him destined to become a mega star. Atletico have wisely acquired him at this stage. They will likely make more than double what they paid for him within the next two to three years, unless they become super cash-rich themselves.
[/video]
So, in short, your unnecessary rambling aside, you agree.danfo driver wrote:This is poor analysis. Why would Barca pay 128 million euros for a child who has only performed in a backwater league, instead of 120 million Euros for an adult who has performed year in year out, for years IN THEIR LEAGUE?theYemster wrote:Shows the laziness of those big clubs. Only like shiny things. Barca should've opted for him instead of Griezmann since they already had Coutinho who they never really have a decent chance.Bigpokey24 wrote:ATM sold Griez, Hernan and one the one City bought for 103, 89 and 70 millions .... they didn't even lose a dime after the purchase of FelixCally wrote:The young man seems not to be fazed by any opponent or occasion. He plays with a certain audacity that makes him destined to become a mega star. Atletico have wisely acquired him at this stage. They will likely make more than double what they paid for him within the next two to three years, unless they become super cash-rich themselves.
[/video]
Secondly, they dont even play the same role. Joao plays the role Messi plays at Barca, so is he coming in to bench Messi?
Anyway, PERSONALLY, I believe Joao will turn out a better player than Griezmann. Griezmann is a choker and mentally weak, in my opinion, so my preference is Joao. But when you analyze the situation properly, there is no way any serious club in barca's position will go for Joao over Griezamann. When Griezmann leaves Barca, and Joao has proven himself, Barca is rich enough to go and get him, if they choose to.
No, I strongly disagree, and I am happy to go over it again with you. Barca CANNOT pay more money for a child who has one season in a poor league and ignore a cheaper proven world class player who has performed as one of the best players in Barca's league for ONE DECADE!theYemster wrote:So, in short, your unnecessary rambling aside, you agree.danfo driver wrote:This is poor analysis. Why would Barca pay 128 million euros for a child who has only performed in a backwater league, instead of 120 million Euros for an adult who has performed year in year out, for years IN THEIR LEAGUE?theYemster wrote:Shows the laziness of those big clubs. Only like shiny things. Barca should've opted for him instead of Griezmann since they already had Coutinho who they never really have a decent chance.Bigpokey24 wrote:ATM sold Griez, Hernan and one the one City bought for 103, 89 and 70 millions .... they didn't even lose a dime after the purchase of FelixCally wrote:The young man seems not to be fazed by any opponent or occasion. He plays with a certain audacity that makes him destined to become a mega star. Atletico have wisely acquired him at this stage. They will likely make more than double what they paid for him within the next two to three years, unless they become super cash-rich themselves.
[/video]
Secondly, they dont even play the same role. Joao plays the role Messi plays at Barca, so is he coming in to bench Messi?
Anyway, PERSONALLY, I believe Joao will turn out a better player than Griezmann. Griezmann is a choker and mentally weak, in my opinion, so my preference is Joao. But when you analyze the situation properly, there is no way any serious club in barca's position will go for Joao over Griezamann. When Griezmann leaves Barca, and Joao has proven himself, Barca is rich enough to go and get him, if they choose to.
If you think he's eventually gonna be a better player than Griezmann, that means they're gonna end up paying more for him down the line when they can easily use the Griezmann money to get him now and even loan him out. Then rather than get Griezmann, stick with Coutinho or get the Neymar that they are trying to.danfo driver wrote:No, I strongly disagree, and I am happy to go over it again with you. Barca CANNOT pay more money for a child who has one season in a poor league and ignore a cheaper proven world class player who has performed as one of the best players in Barca's league for ONE DECADE!theYemster wrote:So, in short, your unnecessary rambling aside, you agree.danfo driver wrote:This is poor analysis. Why would Barca pay 128 million euros for a child who has only performed in a backwater league, instead of 120 million Euros for an adult who has performed year in year out, for years IN THEIR LEAGUE?theYemster wrote:Shows the laziness of those big clubs. Only like shiny things. Barca should've opted for him instead of Griezmann since they already had Coutinho who they never really have a decent chance.Bigpokey24 wrote:ATM sold Griez, Hernan and one the one City bought for 103, 89 and 70 millions .... they didn't even lose a dime after the purchase of FelixCally wrote:The young man seems not to be fazed by any opponent or occasion. He plays with a certain audacity that makes him destined to become a mega star. Atletico have wisely acquired him at this stage. They will likely make more than double what they paid for him within the next two to three years, unless they become super cash-rich themselves.
[/video]
Secondly, they dont even play the same role. Joao plays the role Messi plays at Barca, so is he coming in to bench Messi?
Anyway, PERSONALLY, I believe Joao will turn out a better player than Griezmann. Griezmann is a choker and mentally weak, in my opinion, so my preference is Joao. But when you analyze the situation properly, there is no way any serious club in barca's position will go for Joao over Griezamann. When Griezmann leaves Barca, and Joao has proven himself, Barca is rich enough to go and get him, if they choose to.
I know you are a fan and you think clubs analyze football like you do when you play video games, but it doesn't work like that. You are telling a club to pay more for a 19-year-old who could fail spectacularly rather than paying less for a proven world-class player. Are you kidding? You think this is FIFA 19?
After Joao has performed in Spain for multiple years, and proven that he is ready for the responsibility of Barcelona, Barca can bring him in. Afterall, Coutinho, Dembele and Malcom were tearing better leagues up and see how they have all failed, spectacularly at Barca.
Most of you think playing for a big club, with all that pressure is the same as playing for a club were if you draw a game, it's celebrated like a win. LMAO
For a big club, it doesnt work that way.theYemster wrote: If you think he's eventually gonna be a better player than Griezmann, that means they're gonna end up paying more for him down the line when they can easily use the Griezmann money to get him now and even loan him out.
1. Coutinho's wages is too outrageous to pack him on the bench.Then rather than get Griezmann, stick with Coutinho or get the Neymar that they are trying to.
I dont understand this statement. They sold Malcom (one of the worst performers in the League) for 41 million and replaced him with Griezmann (one of the best performers in the league) for 120 million.Griezmann is totally unnecessary considering his timeline clashes with the stars already in the team.
Atleti initially bought Griezmann from Sociedad for 30 million. The same way Barca has outlayed quadruple that amount to purchase Griezmann, they will happily outlay double to purchase Joao, if they wish to do so and it will have absolutely no negative bearing on their books. Best believe that!Anyways, that's what I should do. Good luck to them but we'll all be here in a couple of years when they outlay double that amount for Felix.
txj wrote:What a brilliant run by Joao Felix and is brought down for a PK