Cybereagles

just simply a carp game all round.

why Klopp always goes so conservative at OT is beyond me...

Atkinson came here to do a job on LFC. Not one Manure player got a YC in spite of numerous hacking jobs......

[color=brown]txj[/color] wrote: just simply a carp game all round.

why Klopp always goes so conservative at OT is beyond me...

Atkinson came here to do a job on LFC. Not one Manure player got a YC in spite of numerous hacking jobs......

Which team hacked more?

green4life wrote:

Its a Goal wrote:The same shoulder Dele used to control the ball to score yesterday is the one used to clear the ball for Manure.

Translation: E sweet when VAR favor you abi?

no mind am. If not for VAR ojoro, Spuds would get relegated this year

...I won a local bet. Predicted match will end in a draw, 1-1, and that United will score first. My prize, large hand tossed pizza with all the meats and trimmings

A draw was the best possible result for united! We lacked creativity, the Rashford substitution was strange, he was playing well today! We seriously need players

txj wrote:just simply a carp game all round.

why Klopp always goes so conservative at OT is beyond me...

Atkinson came here to do a job on LFC. Not one Manure player got a YC in spite of numerous hacking jobs......

Man United ... 6 fouls

Liverpool ... 14 fouls

Numerous hacking jobs? Who was fouling who?

green4life wrote:

txj wrote:just simply a carp game all round.

why Klopp always goes so conservative at OT is beyond me...

Atkinson came here to do a job on LFC. Not one Manure player got a YC in spite of numerous hacking jobs......

Man United ... 6 fouls

Liverpool ... 14 fouls

Numerous hacking jobs? Who was fouling who?

Fabinho got a yellow card and rightfully so but he got fouled twice the same way and no card for either player

Tough game. Now every one sees what Salah brings even when he isn’t scoring. Point is Origi gets us those moments but his anticipation can be spotty. If he is going to play, he has to play in middle and that means he plays when Firmino is resting. I was screaming for Keita. The defense knows he can dribble so he wasn’t pressed and allowed the easy pass to Robertson. I will take the point. This is the premier league. There are no easy games

marko wrote:A draw was the best possible result for united! We lacked creativity, the Rashford substitution was strange, he was playing well today! We seriously need players

Really? Kai!!! i miss TFCO! He would have slapped your fat mouth! I thought you didnt need any players and united had asquad that can rival PSG's?

The United college team didn't do too bad today against the UCL winner.

green4life wrote:

txj wrote:just simply a carp game all round.

why Klopp always goes so conservative at OT is beyond me...

Atkinson came here to do a job on LFC. Not one Manure player got a YC in spite of numerous hacking jobs......

Man United ... 6 fouls

Liverpool ... 14 fouls

Numerous hacking jobs? Who was fouling who?

You actually made my point.

this was a derby, forget form, united Liverpool games are always close, today was no different, Liverpool finished stronger because they have a coach that can change things and get impact, OGS is limited in that department

txj wrote:

green4life wrote:

txj wrote:just simply a carp game all round.

why Klopp always goes so conservative at OT is beyond me...

Atkinson came here to do a job on LFC. Not one Manure player got a YC in spite of numerous hacking jobs......

Man United ... 6 fouls

Liverpool ... 14 fouls

Numerous hacking jobs? Who was fouling who?

You actually made my point.

Trying to sound smart when caught with pants down

benteke wrote:

txj wrote:

green4life wrote:

txj wrote:just simply a carp game all round.

why Klopp always goes so conservative at OT is beyond me...

Atkinson came here to do a job on LFC. Not one Manure player got a YC in spite of numerous hacking jobs......

Man United ... 6 fouls

Liverpool ... 14 fouls

Numerous hacking jobs? Who was fouling who?

You actually made my point.

Trying to sound smart when caught with pants down

Are you always this consistently stupid, or just affecting to be?

If you don't call the fouls then there won't be a foul count in your favor...

green4life wrote:

txj wrote:just simply a carp game all round.

why Klopp always goes so conservative at OT is beyond me...

Atkinson came here to do a job on LFC. Not one Manure player got a YC in spite of numerous hacking jobs......

Man United ... 6 fouls

Liverpool ... 14 fouls

Numerous hacking jobs? Who was fouling who?

why you do ATF like this nah? anyways Liverpool are fouling machines... the game vs Chelsea, all they did was foul , foul and foul

txj wrote:

green4life wrote:

txj wrote:just simply a carp game all round.

why Klopp always goes so conservative at OT is beyond me...

Atkinson came here to do a job on LFC. Not one Manure player got a YC in spite of numerous hacking jobs......

Man United ... 6 fouls

Liverpool ... 14 fouls

Numerous hacking jobs? Who was fouling who?

You actually made my point.

I understand your concern. ManU should have had 1 or 2 yellows but also keep in mind that this was a derby game in addition to the fact that a higher foul count generally leads to more cards. This is also against the backdrop of VVD, Matip, and Fabinho routinely dishing out rough tackles some of which went unpunished as 50/50 derby inspired challenges. The bottom line is the ref was par for course on the day in consideration that Liverpool out fouled ManU at more than 2 to 1 ratio.

txj wrote:

benteke wrote:

txj wrote:

green4life wrote:

txj wrote:just simply a carp game all round.

why Klopp always goes so conservative at OT is beyond me...

Atkinson came here to do a job on LFC. Not one Manure player got a YC in spite of numerous hacking jobs......

Man United ... 6 fouls

Liverpool ... 14 fouls

Numerous hacking jobs? Who was fouling who?

You actually made my point.

Trying to sound smart when caught with pants down

Are you always this consistently stupid, or just affecting to be?

If you don't call the fouls then there won't be a foul count in your favor...

No, problem is you are biased and try to sound clever.
Liverpool fouls were so many that the ref had no choice but to call most of them.
So you have no point, better to move on

benteke wrote:

txj wrote:

green4life wrote:

txj wrote:just simply a carp game all round.

why Klopp always goes so conservative at OT is beyond me...

Atkinson came here to do a job on LFC. Not one Manure player got a YC in spite of numerous hacking jobs......

Man United ... 6 fouls

Liverpool ... 14 fouls

Numerous hacking jobs? Who was fouling who?

You actually made my point.

Trying to sound smart when caught with pants down

Odiegwu! so everybody come see ATF small black yansh?

green4life wrote:

txj wrote:

green4life wrote:

txj wrote:just simply a carp game all round.

why Klopp always goes so conservative at OT is beyond me...

Atkinson came here to do a job on LFC. Not one Manure player got a YC in spite of numerous hacking jobs......

Man United ... 6 fouls

Liverpool ... 14 fouls

Numerous hacking jobs? Who was fouling who?

You actually made my point.

I understand your concern. ManU should have had 1 or 2 yellows but also keep in mind that this was a derby game in addition to the fact that a higher foul count generally leads to more cards. This is also against the backdrop of VVD, Matip, and Fabinho routinely dishing out rough tackles some of which went unpunished as 50/50 derby inspired challenges. The bottom line is the ref was par for course on the day in consideration that Liverpool out fouled ManU at more than 2 to 1 ratio.

A widespread criticism of LFC is that they did not match MU's intensity and physicality which was clear the entire game, save for late in 2hf. How is it the team that was pressing more intensely gets half the fouls? It doesn't make sense, which is why most pundits today acknowledge that Atkinson was quite poor...

benteke wrote:

txj wrote:

benteke wrote:

txj wrote:

green4life wrote:

txj wrote:just simply a carp game all round.

why Klopp always goes so conservative at OT is beyond me...

Atkinson came here to do a job on LFC. Not one Manure player got a YC in spite of numerous hacking jobs......

Man United ... 6 fouls

Liverpool ... 14 fouls

Numerous hacking jobs? Who was fouling who?

You actually made my point.

Trying to sound smart when caught with pants down

Are you always this consistently stupid, or just affecting to be?

If you don't call the fouls then there won't be a foul count in your favor...

No, problem is you are biased and try to sound clever.
Liverpool fouls were so many that the ref had no choice but to call most of them.
So you have no point, better to move on

The problem is you are too stupid to tell the difference...

Here is Dermot Gallagher on Skysports. I guess he too is biased:

DERMOT'S VERDICT: Foul, but VAR right not to overrule.

DERMOT SAYS: "What I need to explain is that this isn't a VAR decision, it's Martin Atkinson's decision. When it goes in the net, VAR asks whether it was offside, no, was there a handball, no, was there a foul in the build-up - and the referee is the closest person to it.

"He says no, there was a vote this morning with 50,000 people voting, about half said yes, half said no, so the VAR can't call it clear and obvious and go against the referee. I did think it was a foul, though.

"Martin waved it away, and once he does that it's out of the VAR's hands. It's such a subjective decision, such a controversial decision, someone says yes, someone says no, they can't go with it."

txj wrote:

benteke wrote:

txj wrote:

benteke wrote:

txj wrote:

green4life wrote:

txj wrote:just simply a carp game all round.

why Klopp always goes so conservative at OT is beyond me...

Atkinson came here to do a job on LFC. Not one Manure player got a YC in spite of numerous hacking jobs......

Man United ... 6 fouls

Liverpool ... 14 fouls

Numerous hacking jobs? Who was fouling who?

You actually made my point.

Trying to sound smart when caught with pants down

Are you always this consistently stupid, or just affecting to be?

If you don't call the fouls then there won't be a foul count in your favor...

No, problem is you are biased and try to sound clever.
Liverpool fouls were so many that the ref had no choice but to call most of them.
So you have no point, better to move on

The problem is you are too stupid to tell the difference...

Here is Dermot Gallagher on Skysports. I guess he too is biased:

DERMOT'S VERDICT: Foul, but VAR right not to overrule.

DERMOT SAYS: "What I need to explain is that this isn't a VAR decision, it's Martin Atkinson's decision. When it goes in the net, VAR asks whether it was offside, no, was there a handball, no, was there a foul in the build-up - and the referee is the closest person to it.

"He says no, there was a vote this morning with 50,000 people voting, about half said yes, half said no, so the VAR can't call it clear and obvious and go against the referee. I did think it was a foul, though.

"Martin waved it away, and once he does that it's out of the VAR's hands. It's such a subjective decision, such a controversial decision, someone says yes, someone says no, they can't go with it."

No, it doesn't matter, i don't need to read or listen to this Dermot whatever, i watched the game.
And you can call me all the stupidity you want thank you