benteke wrote:
txj wrote:
benteke wrote:
txj wrote:
green4life wrote:
txj wrote:
just simply a carp game all round.
why Klopp always goes so conservative at OT is beyond me...
Atkinson came here to do a job on LFC. Not one Manure player got a YC in spite of numerous hacking jobs......
Man United ... 6 fouls
Liverpool ... 14 fouls
Numerous hacking jobs? Who was fouling who?

You actually made my point.
Trying to sound smart when caught with pants down

Are you always this consistently stupid, or just affecting to be?
If you don't call the fouls then there won't be a foul count in your favor...
No, problem is you are biased and try to sound clever.
Liverpool fouls were so many that the ref had no choice but to call most of them.
So you have no point, better to move on

The problem is you are too stupid to tell the difference...
Here is Dermot Gallagher on Skysports. I guess he too is biased:
DERMOT'S VERDICT: Foul, but VAR right not to overrule.
DERMOT SAYS: "What I need to explain is that this isn't a VAR decision, it's Martin Atkinson's decision. When it goes in the net, VAR asks whether it was offside, no, was there a handball, no, was there a foul in the build-up - and the referee is the closest person to it.
"He says no, there was a vote this morning with 50,000 people voting, about half said yes, half said no, so the VAR can't call it clear and obvious and go against the referee.
I did think it was a foul, though.
"Martin waved it away, and once he does that it's out of the VAR's hands. It's such a subjective decision, such a controversial decision, someone says yes, someone says no, they can't go with it."