Rohr v NFF - Fifa verdict pending!
Moderators: Moderator Team, phpBB2 - Administrators
-
- Eaglet
- Posts: 30210
- Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 10:39 am
Rohr v NFF - Fifa verdict pending!
https://www.owngoalnigeria.com/2022/04/ ... next-week/
Yeeeaa.... Baba Rohr don take NFF go Fifa., a ruling is due next week according to this report. If Fifa rules against the NFF it's wrap up what must be the most disastrous yr in recent memory. We were unceremoniously bounced from Afcon and WC, now we might have to pay the man who should've led the team to those tournaments. Kai....Fifa should have mercy and postpone this judgement for humanitarian reasons.
Yeeeaa.... Baba Rohr don take NFF go Fifa., a ruling is due next week according to this report. If Fifa rules against the NFF it's wrap up what must be the most disastrous yr in recent memory. We were unceremoniously bounced from Afcon and WC, now we might have to pay the man who should've led the team to those tournaments. Kai....Fifa should have mercy and postpone this judgement for humanitarian reasons.
OCCUPY NFF!!
- Bigpokey24
- Super Eagle
- Posts: 111742
- Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2003 4:58 pm
- Location: Earth
Re: Rohr v NFF - Fifa verdict pending!
You dey worship this oyinbo man no be small..kai this your obsession is scary
SuperEagles
© Bigpokey24, most loved on CE
My post are with no warranties and confers zero rights. Get out your feelings
It is not authorized by CyberEagles. You assume all risk for your use.
All rights aren't reserved
© Bigpokey24, most loved on CE
My post are with no warranties and confers zero rights. Get out your feelings
It is not authorized by CyberEagles. You assume all risk for your use.
All rights aren't reserved
Re: Rohr v NFF - Fifa verdict pending!
What's the charge against NFF?
"We now live in a nation where doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge,
governments destroy freedom, the press destroys information, religion destroys morals, and our banks destroy the economy.”
― Chris Hedges
governments destroy freedom, the press destroys information, religion destroys morals, and our banks destroy the economy.”
― Chris Hedges
Re: Rohr v NFF - Fifa verdict pending!
Not a fan of the NFF and their uselessness, but abeg Rohr should go and rest with this brouhaha with the NFF, he has no case Fifa should stress themselves about.
-
- Eaglet
- Posts: 30210
- Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 10:39 am
Re: Rohr v NFF - Fifa verdict pending!
He's entitled to lost wages as a result of early termination of his contract. It's basic contract law.
Pay up!
OCCUPY NFF!!
-
- Eaglet
- Posts: 30210
- Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 10:39 am
Re: Rohr v NFF - Fifa verdict pending!
1, Breach of contract
2, Defamation of character.
3, libel
4, Fraud
5, lost wages
OCCUPY NFF!!
- Bigpokey24
- Super Eagle
- Posts: 111742
- Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2003 4:58 pm
- Location: Earth
Re: Rohr v NFF - Fifa verdict pending!
We know you work for owngoal, as well as being king of misinformation. Now we are surprised that you now have a job as ****'s lawyer. Man must wackEMIR KONGI JAFFI JOFFA wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 6:33 am1, Breach of contract
2, Defamation of character.
3, libel
4, Fraud
5, lost wages
SuperEagles
© Bigpokey24, most loved on CE
My post are with no warranties and confers zero rights. Get out your feelings
It is not authorized by CyberEagles. You assume all risk for your use.
All rights aren't reserved
© Bigpokey24, most loved on CE
My post are with no warranties and confers zero rights. Get out your feelings
It is not authorized by CyberEagles. You assume all risk for your use.
All rights aren't reserved
Re: Rohr v NFF - Fifa verdict pending!
EMIR KONGI JAFFI JOFFA wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 6:29 amHe's entitled to lost wages as a result of early termination of his contract. It's basic contract law.
Pay up!
I agree. But still he was rightly sacked. NFF should pay up
-
- Eaglet
- Posts: 30210
- Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 10:39 am
Re: Rohr v NFF - Fifa verdict pending!
Ok. They wanted to avoid a disaster so they sacked him, the disaster was successfully avoided.aruako1 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 12:58 pmEMIR KONGI JAFFI JOFFA wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 6:29 amHe's entitled to lost wages as a result of early termination of his contract. It's basic contract law.
Pay up!
I agree. But still he was rightly sacked. NFF should pay up
Time to pay up
OCCUPY NFF!!
- maceo4
- Eaglet
- Posts: 46832
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 6:41 am
- Location: Land of the Terrapins
- Contact:
Re: Rohr v NFF - Fifa verdict pending!
Na wa lolEMIR KONGI JAFFI JOFFA wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 6:05 pmOk. They wanted to avoid a disaster so they sacked him, the disaster was successfully avoided.aruako1 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 12:58 pmEMIR KONGI JAFFI JOFFA wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 6:29 amHe's entitled to lost wages as a result of early termination of his contract. It's basic contract law.
Pay up!
I agree. But still he was rightly sacked. NFF should pay up
Time to pay up
Super Eagus 4 Life!
Made in the image of God that's a selfie!
Made in the image of God that's a selfie!
Re: Rohr v NFF - Fifa verdict pending!
Yes. And the change didn't work out. Thin line between success and failure. We move. But Rohr was rightly sackedEMIR KONGI JAFFI JOFFA wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 6:05 pmOk. They wanted to avoid a disaster so they sacked him, the disaster was successfully avoided.aruako1 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 12:58 pmEMIR KONGI JAFFI JOFFA wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 6:29 amHe's entitled to lost wages as a result of early termination of his contract. It's basic contract law.
Pay up!
I agree. But still he was rightly sacked. NFF should pay up
Time to pay up
Re: Rohr v NFF - Fifa verdict pending!
aruako1 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 9:58 pmYes. And the change didn't work out. Thin line between success and failure. We move. But Rohr was rightly sackedEMIR KONGI JAFFI JOFFA wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 6:05 pmOk. They wanted to avoid a disaster so they sacked him, the disaster was successfully avoided.aruako1 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 12:58 pmEMIR KONGI JAFFI JOFFA wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 6:29 amHe's entitled to lost wages as a result of early termination of his contract. It's basic contract law.
Pay up!
I agree. But still he was rightly sacked. NFF should pay up
Time to pay up
Chai! This aruako stubborn sha!!!!!!
"Ole kuku ni gbogbo wọn "
Re: Rohr v NFF - Fifa verdict pending!
Haba..World Class Coach Rohr should get a damn job. Nobody wants to hire him.
- TonyTheTigerKiller
- Eaglet
- Posts: 12593
- Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 7:55 pm
Re: Rohr v NFF - Fifa verdict pending!
The Rohrs of the world don’t need jobs… as long as the courtyard iddiot named Pinnick is willing to create a retirement fund for 3rd rate (and I’m being extremely generous) foreign coaches
Cheers.
-
- Eaglet
- Posts: 30210
- Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2003 10:39 am
Re: Rohr v NFF - Fifa verdict pending!
Yo azz missed 2 Afcon before he was hired. He qualified and won bronze , qualified for the. wC and did well. Now that the team was bounced out of Afcon and WC like Bigporker at a VIPevent he's now 3rd rate.TonyTheTigerKiller wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 4:35 amThe Rohrs of the world don’t need jobs… as long as the courtyard iddiot named Pinnick is willing to create a retirement fund for 3rd rate (and I’m being extremely generous) foreign coaches
Cheers.
Ok o. Just pay up and let him take a 3rd rate vacation.
OCCUPY NFF!!
- chief nfachairman
- Egg
- Posts: 2674
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2003 2:35 pm
Re: Rohr v NFF - Fifa verdict pending!
The bad was treated very bad and replaced with a TOTALLY useless option and we lost out on everything. I can bet that Rohr woudl have atleast gotten us golden bronze at the AFCON and gotten us to the WC.Bigpokey24 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 12:14 am You dey worship this oyinbo man no be small..kai this your obsession is scary
Now they are about to replace useless with another USELESS Pesseiro.
- chief nfachairman
- Egg
- Posts: 2674
- Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2003 2:35 pm
Re: Rohr v NFF - Fifa verdict pending!
aruako1 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 9:58 pmYes. And the change didn't work out. Thin line between success and failure. We move. But Rohr was rightly sackedEMIR KONGI JAFFI JOFFA wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 6:05 pmOk. They wanted to avoid a disaster so they sacked him, the disaster was successfully avoided.aruako1 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 12:58 pmEMIR KONGI JAFFI JOFFA wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 6:29 amHe's entitled to lost wages as a result of early termination of his contract. It's basic contract law.
Pay up!
I agree. But still he was rightly sacked. NFF should pay up
Time to pay up
Typical trait of a Buharist.
Re: Rohr v NFF - Fifa verdict pending!
Me? A Buharist? Rohr was rightly sacked but he should get his full entitlements. Sorry if it hurts your feelings.chief nfachairman wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 7:32 amaruako1 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 9:58 pmYes. And the change didn't work out. Thin line between success and failure. We move. But Rohr was rightly sackedEMIR KONGI JAFFI JOFFA wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 6:05 pmOk. They wanted to avoid a disaster so they sacked him, the disaster was successfully avoided.aruako1 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 12:58 pmEMIR KONGI JAFFI JOFFA wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 6:29 amHe's entitled to lost wages as a result of early termination of his contract. It's basic contract law.
Pay up!
I agree. But still he was rightly sacked. NFF should pay up
Time to pay up
Typical trait of a Buharist.
Re: Rohr v NFF - Fifa verdict pending!
It is not about being stubborn. I liked Rohr. I travelled to the WC in 2018 excited about what he had done with the team. I was dissapointed after WC 2018 and when he stayed on, I was happy for him to build with a young team.Damunk wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 12:00 amaruako1 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 9:58 pmYes. And the change didn't work out. Thin line between success and failure. We move. But Rohr was rightly sackedEMIR KONGI JAFFI JOFFA wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 6:05 pmOk. They wanted to avoid a disaster so they sacked him, the disaster was successfully avoided.aruako1 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 12:58 pmEMIR KONGI JAFFI JOFFA wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 6:29 amHe's entitled to lost wages as a result of early termination of his contract. It's basic contract law.
Pay up!
I agree. But still he was rightly sacked. NFF should pay up
Time to pay up
Chai! This aruako stubborn sha!!!!!!
I remember being the only one defending him as I watched the 2-0 loss against Madagascar with friends. Subsequently, even though I was unhappy with the loss against Algeria, I never called for his head. Even after the draw against Sierra Leone, I did not call fir his head.
I was very critical of him in the home game against Benin Republic, but I praised him profusely after the excellent away win against Cape Verde. I only called for his sack after the terrible home display against Cape Verde. This was due to an accumulation of poor results.
You may not agree with me that sacking him was right. But nobody should tell me that I arrived at this position without careful consideration.
Re: Rohr v NFF - Fifa verdict pending!
My guy, the real question is, did you see this absolutely disastrous outcome coming? What really could be worse? And what was your response to those that loudly and incessantly warned against it?aruako1 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 8:08 amIt is not about being stubborn. I liked Rohr. I travelled to the WC in 2018 excited about what he had done with the team. I was dissapointed after WC 2018 and when he stayed on, I was happy for him to build with a young team.Damunk wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 12:00 amaruako1 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 9:58 pmYes. And the change didn't work out. Thin line between success and failure. We move. But Rohr was rightly sackedEMIR KONGI JAFFI JOFFA wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 6:05 pmOk. They wanted to avoid a disaster so they sacked him, the disaster was successfully avoided.aruako1 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 12:58 pmEMIR KONGI JAFFI JOFFA wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 6:29 amHe's entitled to lost wages as a result of early termination of his contract. It's basic contract law.
Pay up!
I agree. But still he was rightly sacked. NFF should pay up
Time to pay up
Chai! This aruako stubborn sha!!!!!!
I remember being the only one defending him as I watched the 2-0 loss against Madagascar with friends. Subsequently, even though I was unhappy with the loss against Algeria, I never called for his head. Even after the draw against Sierra Leone, I did not call fir his head.
I was very critical of him in the home game against Benin Republic, but I praised him profusely after the excellent away win against Cape Verde. I only called for his sack after the terrible home display against Cape Verde. This was due to an accumulation of poor results.
You may not agree with me that sacking him was right. But nobody should tell me that I arrived at this position without careful consideration.
What is the point of change when you come out in the worst possible situation - which is what you were being warned against?
The ‘stubbornness’ is not that you are denying your decision to have him sacked. You are not one of those that are distancing themselves from their own campaign.
The stubbornness is refusing to even consider that you might have been wrong and maybe a little more consideration should have been given to those ‘WOWOs’ that called for restraint.
The calls were endless and if you were - and still are - one of those that met such calls with derision, then ‘stubbornness’ is in order. So it’s not even ‘wisdom in hindsight’.
Basically, by not recognizing all that, you are saying that if you’d had a crystal ball at the time showing you where we are now, you still would have had him sacked in the same circumstances.
Ol Boi, weytin dem dey call dat one nah?
By the way…you are more or less the only anti-Rohr person I can properly engage with on this issue. The feelings are far too raw and the overwhelming majority are just annoying me and I need to exercise restraint. So no vex say I’m ‘dragging matter’ with you. Na love.
Na only you I fit talk am with.
"Ole kuku ni gbogbo wọn "
Re: Rohr v NFF - Fifa verdict pending!
I'm not anti-Rohr. I just felt he had overstayed his welcome and would not have qualified us for the WC. I have not changed my kind on that position.Damunk wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 8:30 amMy guy, the real question is, did you see this absolutely disastrous outcome coming? What really could be worse? And what was your response to those that loudly and incessantly warned against it?aruako1 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 8:08 amIt is not about being stubborn. I liked Rohr. I travelled to the WC in 2018 excited about what he had done with the team. I was dissapointed after WC 2018 and when he stayed on, I was happy for him to build with a young team.Damunk wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 12:00 amaruako1 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 9:58 pmYes. And the change didn't work out. Thin line between success and failure. We move. But Rohr was rightly sackedEMIR KONGI JAFFI JOFFA wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 6:05 pmOk. They wanted to avoid a disaster so they sacked him, the disaster was successfully avoided.aruako1 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 12:58 pmEMIR KONGI JAFFI JOFFA wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 6:29 am
He's entitled to lost wages as a result of early termination of his contract. It's basic contract law.
Pay up!
I agree. But still he was rightly sacked. NFF should pay up
Time to pay up
Chai! This aruako stubborn sha!!!!!!
I remember being the only one defending him as I watched the 2-0 loss against Madagascar with friends. Subsequently, even though I was unhappy with the loss against Algeria, I never called for his head. Even after the draw against Sierra Leone, I did not call fir his head.
I was very critical of him in the home game against Benin Republic, but I praised him profusely after the excellent away win against Cape Verde. I only called for his sack after the terrible home display against Cape Verde. This was due to an accumulation of poor results.
You may not agree with me that sacking him was right. But nobody should tell me that I arrived at this position without careful consideration.
What is the point of change when you come out in the worst possible situation - which is what you were being warned against?
The ‘stubbornness’ is not that you are denying your decision to have him sacked. You are not one of those that are distancing themselves from their own campaign.
The stubbornness is refusing to even consider that you might have been wrong and maybe a little more consideration should have been given to those ‘WOWOs’ that called for restraint.
The calls were endless and if you were - and still are - one of those that met such calls with derision, then ‘stubbornness’ is in order. So it’s not even ‘wisdom in hindsight’.
Basically, by not recognizing all that, you are saying that if you’d had a crystal ball at the time showing you where we are now, you still would have had him sacked in the same circumstances.
Ol Boi, weytin dem dey call dat one nah?
By the way…you are more or less the only anti-Rohr person I can properly engage with on this issue. The feelings are far too raw and the overwhelming majority are just annoying me and I need to exercise restraint. So no vex say I’m ‘dragging matter’ with you. Na love.
Na only you I fit talk am with.
There was always a chance that we would not qualify. Even Senegal needed penalty kicks to win both the AFCON and qualify for the WC. However, I did not see Rohr qualifying us either, hence my decision to back his sack. The main villian here is Pinnick. He took too long to sack Rohr once the decision was made for him to go. And the uncertainty about Eguavoen's and Peseiro's roles did not help.
So it was not a mistake to sack Rohr. The mistake was allowing Pinnick near our NFF.
You are not dragging the matter Bro. It would be boring if we all had the same opinions. For now we have to look for the next game and try to cheer our team, whether we like the coach or not.
- maceo4
- Eaglet
- Posts: 46832
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 6:41 am
- Location: Land of the Terrapins
- Contact:
Re: Rohr v NFF - Fifa verdict pending!
Bros, doing the right thing BUT at the wrong time is the same as doing the wrong thing. They could have let **** continue to the ANC as the timing was so short and he had not failed to meet any of his stipulated targets, then if he didn’t meet his ANC target then you have grounds to disengage him. Yes the bigger problem is the NFF and the way they handle things in general. Specifically how they went about firing **** is indicative of their deep-rooted issues and part of the reason some of us were saying that was not the right way to do things. And clearly it has blown up in their faces.aruako1 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 8:57 amI'm not anti-Rohr. I just felt he had overstayed his welcome and would not have qualified us for the WC. I have not changed my kind on that position.Damunk wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 8:30 amMy guy, the real question is, did you see this absolutely disastrous outcome coming? What really could be worse? And what was your response to those that loudly and incessantly warned against it?aruako1 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 8:08 amIt is not about being stubborn. I liked Rohr. I travelled to the WC in 2018 excited about what he had done with the team. I was dissapointed after WC 2018 and when he stayed on, I was happy for him to build with a young team.Damunk wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 12:00 amaruako1 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 9:58 pmYes. And the change didn't work out. Thin line between success and failure. We move. But Rohr was rightly sackedEMIR KONGI JAFFI JOFFA wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 6:05 pmOk. They wanted to avoid a disaster so they sacked him, the disaster was successfully avoided.
Time to pay up
Chai! This aruako stubborn sha!!!!!!
I remember being the only one defending him as I watched the 2-0 loss against Madagascar with friends. Subsequently, even though I was unhappy with the loss against Algeria, I never called for his head. Even after the draw against Sierra Leone, I did not call fir his head.
I was very critical of him in the home game against Benin Republic, but I praised him profusely after the excellent away win against Cape Verde. I only called for his sack after the terrible home display against Cape Verde. This was due to an accumulation of poor results.
You may not agree with me that sacking him was right. But nobody should tell me that I arrived at this position without careful consideration.
What is the point of change when you come out in the worst possible situation - which is what you were being warned against?
The ‘stubbornness’ is not that you are denying your decision to have him sacked. You are not one of those that are distancing themselves from their own campaign.
The stubbornness is refusing to even consider that you might have been wrong and maybe a little more consideration should have been given to those ‘WOWOs’ that called for restraint.
The calls were endless and if you were - and still are - one of those that met such calls with derision, then ‘stubbornness’ is in order. So it’s not even ‘wisdom in hindsight’.
Basically, by not recognizing all that, you are saying that if you’d had a crystal ball at the time showing you where we are now, you still would have had him sacked in the same circumstances.
Ol Boi, weytin dem dey call dat one nah?
By the way…you are more or less the only anti-Rohr person I can properly engage with on this issue. The feelings are far too raw and the overwhelming majority are just annoying me and I need to exercise restraint. So no vex say I’m ‘dragging matter’ with you. Na love.
Na only you I fit talk am with.
There was always a chance that we would not qualify. Even Senegal needed penalty kicks to win both the AFCON and qualify for the WC. However, I did not see Rohr qualifying us either, hence my decision to back his sack. The main villian here is Pinnick. He took too long to sack Rohr once the decision was made for him to go. And the uncertainty about Eguavoen's and Peseiro's roles did not help.
So it was not a mistake to sack Rohr. The mistake was allowing Pinnick near our NFF.
You are not dragging the matter Bro. It would be boring if we all had the same opinions. For now we have to look for the next game and try to cheer our team, whether we like the coach or not.
You have to develop a federation based on accountability and doing things the right way if you want to be successful and it’s way bigger than ****. But to act like they did it things right regarding his sacking is laughable at this point…
Super Eagus 4 Life!
Made in the image of God that's a selfie!
Made in the image of God that's a selfie!
Re: Rohr v NFF - Fifa verdict pending!
I do not disagree with you. The NFF cocked things up and I alluded to it on one of my posts on this thread. And when they did not appoint a replacement immediately after sacking him I was ok with him taking us to the AFCON. However the decision to sack him was ultimately the right one. I do not believe that he would have qualified us for the World Cupmaceo4 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 2:25 pmBros, doing the right thing BUT at the wrong time is the same as doing the wrong thing. They could have let **** continue to the ANC as the timing was so short and he had not failed to meet any of his stipulated targets, then if he didn’t meet his ANC target then you have grounds to disengage him. Yes the bigger problem is the NFF and the way they handle things in general. Specifically how they went about firing **** is indicative of their deep-rooted issues and part of the reason some of us were saying that was not the right way to do things. And clearly it has blown up in their faces.aruako1 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 8:57 amI'm not anti-Rohr. I just felt he had overstayed his welcome and would not have qualified us for the WC. I have not changed my kind on that position.Damunk wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 8:30 amMy guy, the real question is, did you see this absolutely disastrous outcome coming? What really could be worse? And what was your response to those that loudly and incessantly warned against it?aruako1 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 8:08 amIt is not about being stubborn. I liked Rohr. I travelled to the WC in 2018 excited about what he had done with the team. I was dissapointed after WC 2018 and when he stayed on, I was happy for him to build with a young team.Damunk wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 12:00 amaruako1 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 9:58 pmYes. And the change didn't work out. Thin line between success and failure. We move. But Rohr was rightly sackedEMIR KONGI JAFFI JOFFA wrote: ↑Sun Apr 17, 2022 6:05 pm
Ok. They wanted to avoid a disaster so they sacked him, the disaster was successfully avoided.
Time to pay up
Chai! This aruako stubborn sha!!!!!!
I remember being the only one defending him as I watched the 2-0 loss against Madagascar with friends. Subsequently, even though I was unhappy with the loss against Algeria, I never called for his head. Even after the draw against Sierra Leone, I did not call fir his head.
I was very critical of him in the home game against Benin Republic, but I praised him profusely after the excellent away win against Cape Verde. I only called for his sack after the terrible home display against Cape Verde. This was due to an accumulation of poor results.
You may not agree with me that sacking him was right. But nobody should tell me that I arrived at this position without careful consideration.
What is the point of change when you come out in the worst possible situation - which is what you were being warned against?
The ‘stubbornness’ is not that you are denying your decision to have him sacked. You are not one of those that are distancing themselves from their own campaign.
The stubbornness is refusing to even consider that you might have been wrong and maybe a little more consideration should have been given to those ‘WOWOs’ that called for restraint.
The calls were endless and if you were - and still are - one of those that met such calls with derision, then ‘stubbornness’ is in order. So it’s not even ‘wisdom in hindsight’.
Basically, by not recognizing all that, you are saying that if you’d had a crystal ball at the time showing you where we are now, you still would have had him sacked in the same circumstances.
Ol Boi, weytin dem dey call dat one nah?
By the way…you are more or less the only anti-Rohr person I can properly engage with on this issue. The feelings are far too raw and the overwhelming majority are just annoying me and I need to exercise restraint. So no vex say I’m ‘dragging matter’ with you. Na love.
Na only you I fit talk am with.
There was always a chance that we would not qualify. Even Senegal needed penalty kicks to win both the AFCON and qualify for the WC. However, I did not see Rohr qualifying us either, hence my decision to back his sack. The main villian here is Pinnick. He took too long to sack Rohr once the decision was made for him to go. And the uncertainty about Eguavoen's and Peseiro's roles did not help.
So it was not a mistake to sack Rohr. The mistake was allowing Pinnick near our NFF.
You are not dragging the matter Bro. It would be boring if we all had the same opinions. For now we have to look for the next game and try to cheer our team, whether we like the coach or not.
You have to develop a federation based on accountability and doing things the right way if you want to be successful and it’s way bigger than ****. But to act like they did it things right regarding his sacking is laughable at this point…