Kele vs Newcastle
Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2020 3:41 pm
He starts..hmmmm
The Undisputed Number One Home for All Super Eagles Fans
https://forum.cybereagles.com/
The goalkeeper pulled off a spectacular save in one of those chances.Flex Swift wrote:I hope Kele moves during this window. If he had been playing regularly he would have buried to two chances that came his way. He is only playing now because Vardy has a hamstring injury. He is too good to be sitting on the bench.
No mind am. 2020 is barely 24hrs before we get the first silly post on CE. I guess the goalie there to decorate the post by standing and waving between the posts.zee wrote:The goalkeeper pulled off a spectacular save in one of those chances.Flex Swift wrote:I hope Kele moves during this window. If he had been playing regularly he would have buried to two chances that came his way. He is only playing now because Vardy has a hamstring injury. He is too good to be sitting on the bench.
You should take a break from everythingRawlings wrote:Nacho should take a break from football
The ref has a watch that tells him when the ball crosses the line...habaTonyTheTigerKiller wrote:Perez and Madison are both selfish, glory-seeking players. Perez, especially, should spend more time on the bench. Iheanacho’s first opportunity should have been checked by VAR. The ball may have crossed the goal line![]()
Cheers.
Reverend Rawlings, why did you say so, Sir? Is that a vision?Rawlings wrote:Nacho should take a break from football
Community Organized OdasOdas wrote:Reverend Rawlings, why did you say so, Sir? Is that a vision?Rawlings wrote:Nacho should take a break from football
Goal-line technology is neither fool proof nor universal. While it is approved by the IFAB, it is not required. It is reasonably effective in determining if the ball has completely rolled past the line between the goal posts or totally gone past the crossbar. If the goalie is standing behind the line and the ball hits him in the chest, it’s not so effective. Moreover, we don’t know if that technology was even in use during that game but we do know that VAR was in use and they should have checked. After all, the purpose of both the goal-line technology and VAR is to assist the ref in making a more accurate decisionmaceo4 wrote:The ref has a watch that tells him when the ball crosses the line...habaTonyTheTigerKiller wrote:Perez and Madison are both selfish, glory-seeking players. Perez, especially, should spend more time on the bench. Iheanacho’s first opportunity should have been checked by VAR. The ball may have crossed the goal line![]()
Cheers.
What is silly about my post? Forget I forgot I share this forum with individuals who are still very primitive and are stuck in the 17 century still believing and practicing money rituals.EMIR KONGI JAFFI JOFFA wrote:No mind am. 2020 is barely 24hrs before we get the first silly post on CE. I guess the goalie there to decorate the post by standing and waving between the posts.zee wrote:The goalkeeper pulled off a spectacular save in one of those chances.Flex Swift wrote:I hope Kele moves during this window. If he had been playing regularly he would have buried to two chances that came his way. He is only playing now because Vardy has a hamstring injury. He is too good to be sitting on the bench.
That’s what they use to verify ball cross line, not VAR, so why are you wasting your time to write nonsense? It’s a new decade for goodness sakes. HabaTonyTheTigerKiller wrote:Goal-line technology is neither fool proof nor universal. While it is approved by the IFAB, it is not required. It is reasonably effective in determining if the ball has completely rolled past the line between the goal posts or totally gone past the crossbar. If the goalie is standing behind the line and the ball hits him in the chest, it’s not so effective. Moreover, we don’t know if that technology was even in use during that game but we do know that VAR was in use and they should have checked. After all, the purpose of both the goal-line technology and VAR is to assist the ref in making a more accurate decisionmaceo4 wrote:The ref has a watch that tells him when the ball crosses the line...habaTonyTheTigerKiller wrote:Perez and Madison are both selfish, glory-seeking players. Perez, especially, should spend more time on the bench. Iheanacho’s first opportunity should have been checked by VAR. The ball may have crossed the goal line![]()
Cheers.
Cheers.
VAR is designed to check everything. Anytime something doesn’t fit your narrative, it’s nonsense. You’re an idiottmaceo4 wrote:That’s what they use to verify ball cross line, not VAR, so why are you wasting your time to write nonsense? It’s a new decade for goodness sakes. HabaTonyTheTigerKiller wrote:Goal-line technology is neither fool proof nor universal. While it is approved by the IFAB, it is not required. It is reasonably effective in determining if the ball has completely rolled past the line between the goal posts or totally gone past the crossbar. If the goalie is standing behind the line and the ball hits him in the chest, it’s not so effective. Moreover, we don’t know if that technology was even in use during that game but we do know that VAR was in use and they should have checked. After all, the purpose of both the goal-line technology and VAR is to assist the ref in making a more accurate decisionmaceo4 wrote:The ref has a watch that tells him when the ball crosses the line...habaTonyTheTigerKiller wrote:Perez and Madison are both selfish, glory-seeking players. Perez, especially, should spend more time on the bench. Iheanacho’s first opportunity should have been checked by VAR. The ball may have crossed the goal line![]()
Cheers.
Cheers.
ITS NOT JEEEZ! Educate yourself, it’s two separate things they don’t overstep one another, I thought this was obvious: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.howitw ... -work/amp/TonyTheTigerKiller wrote:VAR is designed to check everything. Anytime something doesn’t fit your narrative, it’s nonsense. You’re an idiottmaceo4 wrote:That’s what they use to verify ball cross line, not VAR, so why are you wasting your time to write nonsense? It’s a new decade for goodness sakes. HabaTonyTheTigerKiller wrote:Goal-line technology is neither fool proof nor universal. While it is approved by the IFAB, it is not required. It is reasonably effective in determining if the ball has completely rolled past the line between the goal posts or totally gone past the crossbar. If the goalie is standing behind the line and the ball hits him in the chest, it’s not so effective. Moreover, we don’t know if that technology was even in use during that game but we do know that VAR was in use and they should have checked. After all, the purpose of both the goal-line technology and VAR is to assist the ref in making a more accurate decisionmaceo4 wrote:The ref has a watch that tells him when the ball crosses the line...habaTonyTheTigerKiller wrote:Perez and Madison are both selfish, glory-seeking players. Perez, especially, should spend more time on the bench. Iheanacho’s first opportunity should have been checked by VAR. The ball may have crossed the goal line![]()
Cheers.
Cheers.
Cheers.
I don’t know what the point of the link you posted is since it emphasizes the point that GLT is restricted to checking if the ball crossed the goal line but the addition of VAR will now help to detect other incidents and infractions. That in no way suggests that VAR does not help in determining valid goals. In all of these discussions, you must have missed the part that states very clearly that GLT is not required. So what if GLT is not being used. Are you contending that VAR can’t be used to determine if the ball crossed the goal line? You are actually less intelligent than I gave you credit for initiallymaceo4 wrote:ITS NOT JEEEZ! Educate yourself, it’s two separate things they don’t overstep one another, I thought this was obvious: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.howitw ... -work/amp/TonyTheTigerKiller wrote:VAR is designed to check everything. Anytime something doesn’t fit your narrative, it’s nonsense. You’re an idiottmaceo4 wrote:That’s what they use to verify ball cross line, not VAR, so why are you wasting your time to write nonsense? It’s a new decade for goodness sakes. HabaTonyTheTigerKiller wrote:Goal-line technology is neither fool proof nor universal. While it is approved by the IFAB, it is not required. It is reasonably effective in determining if the ball has completely rolled past the line between the goal posts or totally gone past the crossbar. If the goalie is standing behind the line and the ball hits him in the chest, it’s not so effective. Moreover, we don’t know if that technology was even in use during that game but we do know that VAR was in use and they should have checked. After all, the purpose of both the goal-line technology and VAR is to assist the ref in making a more accurate decisionmaceo4 wrote:The ref has a watch that tells him when the ball crosses the line...habaTonyTheTigerKiller wrote:Perez and Madison are both selfish, glory-seeking players. Perez, especially, should spend more time on the bench. Iheanacho’s first opportunity should have been checked by VAR. The ball may have crossed the goal line![]()
Cheers.
Cheers.
Cheers.