Cybereagles

Posted: **Tue Aug 03, 2021 5:07 pm**

Former Super Eagles coach Samson Siasia has dragged the world football governing body, FIFA, to a court in the United States.

According to court papers exclusively obtained by Premium Times, Siasia has filed a case against FIFA at the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

The former Nigeria international is, among other things, seeking compensation for the ‘damage’ done on his reputation by FIFA with their investigation on an alleged bribery case against him.

https://www.premiumtimesng.com/sports/f ... court.html

Posted: **Tue Aug 03, 2021 5:30 pm**

Hmmmm.
This is a siddon look situation.
I hope he has sought very wise counsel with a good chance of winning.

Posted: **Tue Aug 03, 2021 5:36 pm**

Damunk wrote: ↑Tue Aug 03, 2021 5:30 pm Hmmmm.
This is a siddon look situation.
I hope he has sought very wise counsel with a good chance of winning.

just look at the kind of comment or thoughts from your head...smh

Posted: **Tue Aug 03, 2021 6:05 pm**

Bigpokey24 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 03, 2021 5:36 pm
Damunk wrote: ↑Tue Aug 03, 2021 5:30 pm Hmmmm.
This is a siddon look situation.
I hope he has sought very wise counsel with a good chance of winning.
just look at the kind of comment or thoughts from your head...smh

You are something else bro

Posted: **Tue Aug 03, 2021 8:18 pm**

I feel for the bro but I wouldn't want him getting into more debt and not winning the case.

Posted: **Tue Aug 03, 2021 8:35 pm**

Lolly wrote: ↑Tue Aug 03, 2021 8:18 pm I feel for the bro but I wouldn't want him getting into more debt and not winning the case.

I think he has enough to drag FIFA to court. I doubt he would just take them to court without any $$$$ or defense

Posted: **Tue Aug 03, 2021 9:03 pm**

Bigpokey24 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 03, 2021 8:35 pm
Lolly wrote: ↑Tue Aug 03, 2021 8:18 pm I feel for the bro but I wouldn't want him getting into more debt and not winning the case.
I think he has enough to drag FIFA to court. I doubt he would just take them to court without any $$$$ or defense

More than FIFA does? Might be best for him if its settled out of court and he gets a good check from them to go away lol.

Posted: **Tue Aug 03, 2021 10:06 pm**

maceo4 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 03, 2021 9:03 pm
Bigpokey24 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 03, 2021 8:35 pm
Lolly wrote: ↑Tue Aug 03, 2021 8:18 pm I feel for the bro but I wouldn't want him getting into more debt and not winning the case.
I think he has enough to drag FIFA to court. I doubt he would just take them to court without any $$$$ or defense
More than FIFA does? Might be best for him if its settled out of court and he gets a good check from them to go away lol.

my points exactly

Posted: **Tue Aug 03, 2021 10:29 pm**

If he feels he was wronged, he can't worry about losing. Beisdes, this is a civil case, so the lawyer is probably working for a percentage of compensation if they win.

Lolly wrote: ↑Tue Aug 03, 2021 8:18 pm I feel for the bro but I wouldn't want him getting into more debt and not winning the case.

Posted: **Wed Aug 04, 2021 12:29 am**

Fifa's judgement was not equitable and it really tarnished his reputation. Don't blame him. A life ban smells like some triggered officials wanted to 'show him', they should come explain how they arrived at a life ban.

Posted: **Wed Aug 04, 2021 6:36 am**

maceo4 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 03, 2021 9:03 pm
Bigpokey24 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 03, 2021 8:35 pm
Lolly wrote: ↑Tue Aug 03, 2021 8:18 pm I feel for the bro but I wouldn't want him getting into more debt and not winning the case.
I think he has enough to drag FIFA to court. I doubt he would just take them to court without any $$$$ or defense
More than FIFA does? Might be best for him if its settled out of court and he gets a good check from them to go away lol.

That’s only if they believe he has a strong case.

Posted: **Wed Aug 04, 2021 6:41 am**

felarey wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 12:29 am Fifa's judgement was not equitable and it really tarnished his reputation. Don't blame him. A life ban smells like some triggered officials wanted to 'show him', they should come explain how they arrived at a life ban.

I think that has been implied already.
He claimed he never saw the (email) communication sent to him on more than one occasion.
They took it as a ‘failure to appear’.
From there e enter ‘guilty’ and they gave him the worst possible punishment.

They always knew he could appeal which is what he did.
But let’s not forget. He wasn’t found ‘innocent’ no matter how we try and dress it up.
Remember, it’s not the life ban (which has been quashed anyway) that has primarily tarnished his reputation. It’s the bribery allegation which he wasn’t able to shake off.
I hope he has a top lawyer and a strong case. He better play the race card join.

Posted: **Wed Aug 04, 2021 1:23 pm**

Needs a miracle to win this..

Posted: **Wed Aug 04, 2021 1:57 pm**

Damunk wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 6:41 am
felarey wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 12:29 am Fifa's judgement was not equitable and it really tarnished his reputation. Don't blame him. A life ban smells like some triggered officials wanted to 'show him', they should come explain how they arrived at a life ban.
I think that has been implied already.
He claimed he never saw the (email) communication sent to him on more than one occasion.
They took it as a ‘failure to appear’.
From there e enter ‘guilty’ and they gave him the worst possible punishment.

They always knew he could appeal which is what he did.
But let’s not forget. He wasn’t found ‘innocent’ no matter how we try and dress it up.
Remember, it’s not the life ban (which has been quashed anyway) that has primarily tarnished his reputation. It’s the bribery allegation which he wasn’t able to shake off.
I hope he has a top lawyer and a strong case. He better play the race card join.

The guy no do well at all and I have zero sympathy for anyone who circumvents or attempts to circumvent the laws.

He flouted the rules of the organization and he was rightfully punished(maybe too heavy handed) but he gets what he bargained for.

Don’t fall for your criminal urges, guys. Lol

For Those defending him, you may still be getting away with crimes but the days of reckoning is near.

Posted: **Wed Aug 04, 2021 2:36 pm**

Cito wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 1:57 pm
Damunk wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 6:41 am
felarey wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 12:29 am Fifa's judgement was not equitable and it really tarnished his reputation. Don't blame him. A life ban smells like some triggered officials wanted to 'show him', they should come explain how they arrived at a life ban.
I think that has been implied already.
He claimed he never saw the (email) communication sent to him on more than one occasion.
They took it as a ‘failure to appear’.
From there e enter ‘guilty’ and they gave him the worst possible punishment.

They always knew he could appeal which is what he did.
But let’s not forget. He wasn’t found ‘innocent’ no matter how we try and dress it up.
Remember, it’s not the life ban (which has been quashed anyway) that has primarily tarnished his reputation. It’s the bribery allegation which he wasn’t able to shake off.
I hope he has a top lawyer and a strong case. He better play the race card join.
The guy no do well at all and I have zero sympathy for anyone who circumvents or attempts to circumvent the laws.

He flouted the rules of the organization and he was rightfully punished(maybe too heavy handed) but he gets what he bargained for.

Don’t fall for your criminal urges, guys. Lol

For Those defending him, you may still be getting away with crimes but the days of reckoning is near.

do you want us to expose your on back hand deals... smh... typical Pharisee

Posted: **Wed Aug 04, 2021 2:41 pm**

Purity wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 1:23 pm Needs a miracle to win this..

No, he does not. FIFA did not need to prove their case to anyone when they convicted him on whatever evidence they had. Now they will have defend their judgement in an independent court, and will have to answer questions themselves.

Posted: **Wed Aug 04, 2021 2:44 pm**

1naija wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 2:41 pm
Purity wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 1:23 pm Needs a miracle to win this..
No, he does not. FIFA did not need to prove their case to anyone when they convicted him on whatever evidence they had. Now they will have defend their judgement in a independent court, and will have to answer questions themselves.

tell the jokers on CE who are clueless to how the law works. We have two UK CEs cito and that damunk who chose to convict by believing FIFA the saints.. I weep for people like that . Let Siasia have his day in court, when that is done then we know where he stands. The fact that the ban was reduced to 5 years from a life time ban , makes one very suspicious about the entire accusation by FIFA

Posted: **Wed Aug 04, 2021 3:18 pm**

1naija wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 2:41 pm
Purity wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 1:23 pm Needs a miracle to win this..
No, he does not. FIFA did not need to prove their case to anyone when they convicted him on whatever evidence they had. Now they will have defend their judgement in a independent court, and will have to answer questions themselves.

He actually has a good case. And he was well advised to file in New York.

Don't forget that FIFA doesn't have a good reputation in the United States.

FIFA might well be advised to settle before dem drag dem oustide the scope of what is being tried.

Posted: **Wed Aug 04, 2021 3:43 pm**

Cellular wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 3:18 pm
1naija wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 2:41 pm
Purity wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 1:23 pm Needs a miracle to win this..
No, he does not. FIFA did not need to prove their case to anyone when they convicted him on whatever evidence they had. Now they will have defend their judgement in a independent court, and will have to answer questions themselves.
He actually has a good case. And he was well advised to file in New York.

Don't forget that FIFA doesn't have a good reputation in the United States.

FIFA might well be advised to settle before dem drag dem oustide the scope of what is being tried.

Yep that’s what I’m hoping for Sia1 that they don’t want the bad PR/repercussions that could come out of this and just settle him and keep it moving.

Posted: **Wed Aug 04, 2021 5:04 pm**

maceo4 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 3:43 pm
Cellular wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 3:18 pm
1naija wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 2:41 pm
Purity wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 1:23 pm Needs a miracle to win this..
No, he does not. FIFA did not need to prove their case to anyone when they convicted him on whatever evidence they had. Now they will have defend their judgement in a independent court, and will have to answer questions themselves.
He actually has a good case. And he was well advised to file in New York.

Don't forget that FIFA doesn't have a good reputation in the United States.

FIFA might well be advised to settle before dem drag dem oustide the scope of what is being tried.
Yep that’s what I’m hoping for Sia1 that they don’t want the bad PR/repercussions that could come out of this and just settle him and keep it moving.

Did fifa actually unilaterally tried and imposed judgement without an independent court just because he didn’t report approach with bribery he never never accepted

Posted: **Wed Aug 04, 2021 8:02 pm**

Bigpokey24 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 2:36 pm
Cito wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 1:57 pm
Damunk wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 6:41 am
felarey wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 12:29 am Fifa's judgement was not equitable and it really tarnished his reputation. Don't blame him. A life ban smells like some triggered officials wanted to 'show him', they should come explain how they arrived at a life ban.
I think that has been implied already.
He claimed he never saw the (email) communication sent to him on more than one occasion.
They took it as a ‘failure to appear’.
From there e enter ‘guilty’ and they gave him the worst possible punishment.

They always knew he could appeal which is what he did.
But let’s not forget. He wasn’t found ‘innocent’ no matter how we try and dress it up.
Remember, it’s not the life ban (which has been quashed anyway) that has primarily tarnished his reputation. It’s the bribery allegation which he wasn’t able to shake off.
I hope he has a top lawyer and a strong case. He better play the race card join.
The guy no do well at all and I have zero sympathy for anyone who circumvents or attempts to circumvent the laws.

He flouted the rules of the organization and he was rightfully punished(maybe too heavy handed) but he gets what he bargained for.

Don’t fall for your criminal urges, guys. Lol

For Those defending him, you may still be getting away with crimes but the days of reckoning is near.
do you want us to expose your on back hand deals... smh... typical Pharisee

Pork, I know you believe everyone is into crime just like you but sorry to burst your bubbles, some of us are not into crimes.

Posted: **Wed Aug 04, 2021 8:04 pm**

Bigpokey24 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 2:44 pm
1naija wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 2:41 pm
Purity wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 1:23 pm Needs a miracle to win this..
No, he does not. FIFA did not need to prove their case to anyone when they convicted him on whatever evidence they had. Now they will have defend their judgement in a independent court, and will have to answer questions themselves.
tell the jokers on CE who are clueless to how the law works. We have two UK CEs cito and that damunk who chose to convict by believing FIFA the saints.. I weep for people like that . Let Siasia have his day in court, when that is done then we know where he stands. The fact that the ban was reduced to 5 years from a life time ban , makes one very suspicious about the entire accusation by FIFA

Pork, why do you believe I live in UK? Is Nevada in UK? I know you are not the smartest guy but it’s easy to use google.

Posted: **Wed Aug 04, 2021 8:08 pm**

Question: Is Pork officially his guy name?

If so, has it been registered on the names registry thread? If not, let's hurry up and do so.

Cito wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 8:02 pm
Bigpokey24 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 04, 2021 2:36 pm

do you want us to expose your on back hand deals... smh... typical Pharisee
Pork, I know you believe everyone is into crime just like you but sorry to burst your bubbles, some of us are not into crimes.

Cybereagles

Siasia drags FIFA to U.S Court

Siasia drags FIFA to U.S Court

Re: Siasia drags FIFA to U.S Court

Re: Siasia drags FIFA to U.S Court

Re: Siasia drags FIFA to U.S Court

Re: Siasia drags FIFA to U.S Court

Re: Siasia drags FIFA to U.S Court

Re: Siasia drags FIFA to U.S Court

Re: Siasia drags FIFA to U.S Court

Re: Siasia drags FIFA to U.S Court

Re: Siasia drags FIFA to U.S Court

Re: Siasia drags FIFA to U.S Court

Re: Siasia drags FIFA to U.S Court

Re: Siasia drags FIFA to U.S Court

Re: Siasia drags FIFA to U.S Court

Re: Siasia drags FIFA to U.S Court

Re: Siasia drags FIFA to U.S Court

Re: Siasia drags FIFA to U.S Court

Re: Siasia drags FIFA to U.S Court

Re: Siasia drags FIFA to U.S Court

Re: Siasia drags FIFA to U.S Court

Re: Siasia drags FIFA to U.S Court

Re: Siasia drags FIFA to U.S Court

Re: Siasia drags FIFA to U.S Court