Cybereagles

1 Manchester United - 66

2. Liverpool - 61

3. Arsenal - 46

4. Chelsea - 31

5. Tottenham Hotspur - 26

6=. Aston Villa - 25

6=. Manchester City - 25

8. Everton - 24

9. Newcastle United - 14

10=. Nottingham Forest - 13

10=. Wolverhampton Wanderers - 13

12. Blackburn Rovers - 12

13. Sunderland - 10

14. Sheffield Wednesday - 10

15. Leeds United - 9

16. West Bromwich Albion - 9

17. West Ham United - 6

18. Sheffield United - 6

19. Huddersfield Town - 5

20. Portsmouth - 5

46 assnal abeg tell us you didn't add like 37 Emirates cups

Take out community shield...nobody cares about that.

The 21st century has not been very good for Spurs. Trophy wise.. only 1 if I am not mistaken... Chei!! We will get there - our way.

Cristao II wrote:The 21st century has not been very good for Spurs. Trophy wise.. only 1 if I am not mistaken... Chei!! We will get there - our way.

It coincide with the age of big spending. Look at Man City and even Chelsea. All the trophies they've won in the advent of money. Remove that from the list and.......
That also doesn't mean Spurs cannot be blamed. A lot of semi final loses etc and the old philosophy of "we don't mind losing as long as we play football the right way" or something to that effect..

pajimoh wrote:

Cristao II wrote:The 21st century has not been very good for Spurs. Trophy wise.. only 1 if I am not mistaken... Chei!! We will get there - our way.

It coincide with the age of big spending. Look at Man City and even Chelsea. All the trophies they've won in the advent of money. Remove that from the list and.......
That also doesn't mean Spurs cannot be blamed. A lot of semi final loses etc and the old philosophy of "we don't mind losing as long as we play football the right way" or something to that effect..

Rubbish, I guess paying wages no be spending....my goodness nah real wah how narrow minded some of una dey think

Bigpokey24 wrote:

pajimoh wrote:

Cristao II wrote:The 21st century has not been very good for Spurs. Trophy wise.. only 1 if I am not mistaken... Chei!! We will get there - our way.

It coincide with the age of big spending. Look at Man City and even Chelsea. All the trophies they've won in the advent of money. Remove that from the list and.......
That also doesn't mean Spurs cannot be blamed. A lot of semi final loses etc and the old philosophy of "we don't mind losing as long as we play football the right way" or something to that effect..

Rubbish, I guess paying wages no be spending....my goodness nah real wah how narrow mindedyouvs some of una dey think

You see why you're a proper 1D10T? If you're capable, go and rethink what you just wrote again.
But let me quickly point you in the right direction. When Man City was scraping the bottom of the lower leagues, were they not paying wages? Were their players and managers playing and working for free?

So what changed? Why decades and decades of yoyo-ing in the lower leagues to attracting top players, managers and suddenly winning the league regularly?
You're a genuine, authentic, original, one of a kind cvnt

pajimoh wrote:

Bigpokey24 wrote:

pajimoh wrote:

Cristao II wrote:The 21st century has not been very good for Spurs. Trophy wise.. only 1 if I am not mistaken... Chei!! We will get there - our way.

It coincide with the age of big spending. Look at Man City and even Chelsea. All the trophies they've won in the advent of money. Remove that from the list and.......
That also doesn't mean Spurs cannot be blamed. A lot of semi final loses etc and the old philosophy of "we don't mind losing as long as we play football the right way" or something to that effect..

Rubbish, I guess paying wages no be spending....my goodness nah real wah how narrow mindedyouvs some of una dey think

You see why you're a proper 1D10T? If you're capable, go and rethink what you just wrote again.
But let me quickly point you in the right direction. When Man City was scraping the bottom of the lower leagues, were they not paying wages? Were their players and managers playing and working for free?

So what changed? Why decades and decades of yoyo-ing in the lower leagues to attracting top players, managers and suddenly winning the league regularly?
You're a genuine, authentic, original, one of a kind cvnt

Bigpokey24 wrote:

pajimoh wrote:

Cristao II wrote:The 21st century has not been very good for Spurs. Trophy wise.. only 1 if I am not mistaken... Chei!! We will get there - our way.

It coincide with the age of big spending. Look at Man City and even Chelsea. All the trophies they've won in the advent of money. Remove that from the list and.......
That also doesn't mean Spurs cannot be blamed. A lot of semi final loses etc and the old philosophy of "we don't mind losing as long as we play football the right way" or something to that effect..

Rubbish, I guess paying wages no be spending....my goodness nah real wah how narrow minded some of una dey think[/quote
He is right,Chelsea before Roman bought the club last won league like 50 years ago from that time.Even Everton,Aston Villa,had more trophies than Chelsea.
Man City case is worst they were just fighting to stay in the league.West Ham was their level in trophies even West Bromwich had more trophies than City before those arab bail City out today.
Thje money factor has affected clubs like Arsenal and spurs that cant compete with money spend by those clubs

pajimoh wrote:

Bigpokey24 wrote:

pajimoh wrote:

Cristao II wrote:The 21st century has not been very good for Spurs. Trophy wise.. only 1 if I am not mistaken... Chei!! We will get there - our way.

It coincide with the age of big spending. Look at Man City and even Chelsea. All the trophies they've won in the advent of money. Remove that from the list and.......
That also doesn't mean Spurs cannot be blamed. A lot of semi final loses etc and the old philosophy of "we don't mind losing as long as we play football the right way" or something to that effect..

Rubbish, I guess paying wages no be spending....my goodness nah real wah how narrow mindedyouvs some of una dey think

You see why you're a proper 1D10T? If you're capable, go and rethink what you just wrote again.
But let me quickly point you in the right direction. When Man City was scraping the bottom of the lower leagues, were they not paying wages? Were their players and managers playing and working for free?

So what changed? Why decades and decades of yoyo-ing in the lower leagues to attracting top players, managers and suddenly winning the league regularly?
You're a genuine, authentic, original, one of a kind cvnt

you lack basic critical thinking, Leicester won the league

Bigpokey24 wrote:

pajimoh wrote:

Bigpokey24 wrote:

pajimoh wrote:

Cristao II wrote:The 21st century has not been very good for Spurs. Trophy wise.. only 1 if I am not mistaken... Chei!! We will get there - our way.

It coincide with the age of big spending. Look at Man City and even Chelsea. All the trophies they've won in the advent of money. Remove that from the list and.......
That also doesn't mean Spurs cannot be blamed. A lot of semi final loses etc and the old philosophy of "we don't mind losing as long as we play football the right way" or something to that effect..

Rubbish, I guess paying wages no be spending....my goodness nah real wah how narrow mindedyouvs some of una dey think

You see why you're a proper 1D10T? If you're capable, go and rethink what you just wrote again.
But let me quickly point you in the right direction. When Man City was scraping the bottom of the lower leagues, were they not paying wages? Were their players and managers playing and working for free?

So what changed? Why decades and decades of yoyo-ing in the lower leagues to attracting top players, managers and suddenly winning the league regularly?
You're a genuine, authentic, original, one of a kind cvnt

you lack basic critical thinking, Leicester won the league

Oh brother Na so you dunce reach?
Sarah had a child in her 70s. It's called a miracle.

Leicester have been trying for almost a millennia. How regular is it for them now compared to the big spenders? You're exactly what you accuse others of. You can't even think, talkless of "critically".

pajimoh, just quit, you blew it, Leicester won the league with teams like City ,Chelsea, United , assnal etc all spending .....etc all spending big dude you are not smart at all kai .... let me post the table again for you

Bigpokey24 wrote:pajimoh, just quit, you blew it, Leicester won the league with teams like City ,Chelsea, United , assnal etc all spending .....etc all spending big dude you are not smart at all kai .... let me post the table again for you

. I was just reading your thread about Messi and someone described you as "the most stupid person ever on CE". Looks like dem don dey rain abuse on you a long time. Tell me, who on this site never curse you before, just one person abeg?

I know you're trying to save face so I will allow you. On the other hand, if you're genuinely serious then no matter what I say, the penny will not drop because you're probably, truly the stupidest person on SE. So why waste my time?

talk about getting flogged ... this dude now derailed this thread and brought up a thread from another topic focus kid, focus...did City and co outspend Leicester? in the 2014/15 season?