USA (1) v Belgium (2)
Moderators: Moderator Team, phpBB2 - Administrators
Re: USA (1) v Belgium (2)
You guys no get sense of humor...wale1974 wrote:Bad belle nah serious matter omcal wrote:...everybody watching football you were busy doing fotoshop..shockin'Sunset wrote:USA Starting XI
Re: USA (1) v Belgium (2)
We heard this song in 1994. It is not just about recent immigrants. The little leagues and feeder programs are focused on certain groups the corporate sponsors want. If it was simply about money, one sponsor could have put ridiculous ad money in the pockets of Giusseppe(Rossi) or Ibisevic to keep them in red, white, and blue. Perhaps those are not the types of Americans they want to sell the game and their products. They have to choose between winning and dreaming.GREENWHITEGREEN wrote:kneedeep,
I believe there was a deliberate attempt to turn soccer into the next La Crosse in the early days, but over the last ten years things are changing and more minority and immigrant kids are coming through. The Federation will learn from countries in this WC such as France, Belgium, England and the Dutch.
Advocating rational thought since 1987
Re: USA (1) v Belgium (2)
Eto’o, Ronaldinho, Deco, and Messi are like good caviar, tender pine-nuts, chemical-free sea salt, and the purest of virgin olive oils, said one of the world's greatest chefs, Ferran Adria of El Bulli restaurant, Before Barca went on to wallop Madrid 3-0 at the Bernabeu.
“I believe the target of anything in life should be to do it so well that it becomes an art. Football is like that. When I watch Barcelona, it is art” — Arsène Wenger, August 2009
“I believe the target of anything in life should be to do it so well that it becomes an art. Football is like that. When I watch Barcelona, it is art” — Arsène Wenger, August 2009
- bret- hart
- Eaglet
- Posts: 27779
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2003 2:27 am
- Location: your girls place
Re: USA (1) v Belgium (2)
Big Shout out to Belguim. Now I can watch ESPN in peace. I no blame yankee. Na Ghana and her useless players I blame. They should have put that useless team out after day 1
I AM THE EXCELLENCE OF EXECUTION- BRET THE "HITMAN" HART.
The Neo Nueves Hart foundation: R.Onyedika, M.Usor, Y.Sor, A.Adeleye, A.Okonkwo, N.Tella, A.Yusuf, E.Onyenezide, V.Lopez, O.Olusegun.
The Neo Nueves Hart foundation: R.Onyedika, M.Usor, Y.Sor, A.Adeleye, A.Okonkwo, N.Tella, A.Yusuf, E.Onyenezide, V.Lopez, O.Olusegun.
Re: USA (1) v Belgium (2)
My priest told me that "Jesus saves". I think he made a mistake, pretty sure in scripture it says, "Tim Howard saves".
- bret- hart
- Eaglet
- Posts: 27779
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2003 2:27 am
- Location: your girls place
Re: USA (1) v Belgium (2)
If not for poor finishing, it easily could have been 4-0 Belgium b4 the 90min mark. Overrated team.
I AM THE EXCELLENCE OF EXECUTION- BRET THE "HITMAN" HART.
The Neo Nueves Hart foundation: R.Onyedika, M.Usor, Y.Sor, A.Adeleye, A.Okonkwo, N.Tella, A.Yusuf, E.Onyenezide, V.Lopez, O.Olusegun.
The Neo Nueves Hart foundation: R.Onyedika, M.Usor, Y.Sor, A.Adeleye, A.Okonkwo, N.Tella, A.Yusuf, E.Onyenezide, V.Lopez, O.Olusegun.
Re: USA (1) v Belgium (2)
^Perhaps, but certainly their finest display thus far. Wilmots has some questions to answer, Meertens or Miralas, Dembele or Fellani, or neither...three in midfield or same again. They'll pose Argentina many problems and by all reckoning, should send them out.
Re: USA (1) v Belgium (2)
Coach, having re-watched the game in hi definition, I have to admit, Belgium is very good. I don't agree with Yujam that they are much better than the US, but they are better. Technically as individuals. Certainly in possession fluency as a team and in overall football IQ.
That's enough in a game of small margins. Now are they good enough to beat Argentina? After today, I'd say yes, except for one thing...Messi.
Messi is a witch. I agree that his supporting cast is lackluster. Argentina still have no clear style or playing identity. They basically rely on short passing, possession, and Messi magic.
On paper Belgium should send them packing. But something again tells me that the gods of football are favoring Argentina. The witch keeps doing it.
Belgium are a comprehensive side. 4 wins. Ooozing talent. Power, pace, stamina, and psychology, mixed with a good bit of football culture and tradition. The Red Devils look good, don't they?
But so does Messi. And as long as he's playing, I think his side can win. Even against what seems to be an emerging tier 1 side like Belgium.
We will see.
Cheers, Mate
That's enough in a game of small margins. Now are they good enough to beat Argentina? After today, I'd say yes, except for one thing...Messi.
Messi is a witch. I agree that his supporting cast is lackluster. Argentina still have no clear style or playing identity. They basically rely on short passing, possession, and Messi magic.
On paper Belgium should send them packing. But something again tells me that the gods of football are favoring Argentina. The witch keeps doing it.
Belgium are a comprehensive side. 4 wins. Ooozing talent. Power, pace, stamina, and psychology, mixed with a good bit of football culture and tradition. The Red Devils look good, don't they?
But so does Messi. And as long as he's playing, I think his side can win. Even against what seems to be an emerging tier 1 side like Belgium.
We will see.
Cheers, Mate
Pax Americana...Wither Now?
- Heliopolis
- Egg
- Posts: 9420
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 12:04 am
Re: USA (1) v Belgium (2)
I cant believe some of the comments here...Belgium is 'not much' better than the US...the difference between the two teams was Belgium had an 'extra sub'
One team dominated the match from start to finish. One team took like 20 shots on target. One team entered this match with 3 wins out of 3 and no goals conceded from open play. One team has players on the very top clubs in Europe. One team went to the other team's country last year and defeated them 4-2. Guess which team that is?
Belgium is head and shoulders above the US its not even funny. Belgium dominated the US more than it dominated any of its 3 group stage opponents.
Had it not been for poor finishing and Howard being amazing, the match could have very well ended 5-0.
BTW, Wilmots needs to be more careful with his subs. His midfield was exhausted in Extra Time yet he failed to recognize it. Fatigue at the end allowed the US to pressure Belgium the last 10 minutes of the match.
One team dominated the match from start to finish. One team took like 20 shots on target. One team entered this match with 3 wins out of 3 and no goals conceded from open play. One team has players on the very top clubs in Europe. One team went to the other team's country last year and defeated them 4-2. Guess which team that is?
Belgium is head and shoulders above the US its not even funny. Belgium dominated the US more than it dominated any of its 3 group stage opponents.
Had it not been for poor finishing and Howard being amazing, the match could have very well ended 5-0.
BTW, Wilmots needs to be more careful with his subs. His midfield was exhausted in Extra Time yet he failed to recognize it. Fatigue at the end allowed the US to pressure Belgium the last 10 minutes of the match.
- sinequanon
- Eaglet
- Posts: 17749
- Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:22 pm
Re: USA (1) v Belgium (2)
I
IBU
IBULEVE
IBULEVE WILL KILL THE PAIN
IBULEVE WILL KILL THE PAIN
IBULEVE WILL KILL THE PAIN...
IBU
IBULEVE
IBULEVE WILL KILL THE PAIN
IBULEVE WILL KILL THE PAIN
IBULEVE WILL KILL THE PAIN...
There'll be time enough for counting, when the dealing's done..
https://voca.ro/1dk47QJEvGY2
https://voca.ro/1dk47QJEvGY2
Re: USA (1) v Belgium (2)
...actually Wondo is a good goal poacher but the gods of football thought otherwise.mate wrote:The difference between fortune and bust is made in moments like Wondolowski missing that sitter. Imagine he actually scored that gift from the football gods? That lack of class is what cost us in the end. Nobody could adequately replace Altidore.
Or could they? I like to now imagine how Julian Green may have done in place of Wondolowski? In his little time on the pitch, Julian looked so much more composed and talented.
Like I said, the US keeps coming on. We have a lot more players in the pipeline.
By the way, my family and I are going to make MLS attendance a regular thing. San Jose Earthquakes baby! We're supporting our US NT team!
Cheers, Mate
I'll be rooting for Belgium to knock off the Argies.
Would hate to see druggie Maradona glorifying his team is in the semis and close to final.
Let the unknowns win it all. Belgium v Costa Rica
- Heliopolis
- Egg
- Posts: 9420
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 12:04 am
Re: USA (1) v Belgium (2)
He was ruled offside on that play...mcal wrote:...actually Wondo is a good goal poacher but the gods of football thought otherwise.mate wrote:The difference between fortune and bust is made in moments like Wondolowski missing that sitter. Imagine he actually scored that gift from the football gods? That lack of class is what cost us in the end. Nobody could adequately replace Altidore.
Or could they? I like to now imagine how Julian Green may have done in place of Wondolowski? In his little time on the pitch, Julian looked so much more composed and talented.
Like I said, the US keeps coming on. We have a lot more players in the pipeline.
By the way, my family and I are going to make MLS attendance a regular thing. San Jose Earthquakes baby! We're supporting our US NT team!
Cheers, Mate
I'll be rooting for Belgium to knock off the Argies.
Would hate to see druggie Maradona glorifying his team is in the semis and close to final.
Let the unknowns win it all. Belgium v Costa Rica
Re: USA (1) v Belgium (2)
Best comment from a neutral......nothing more to add.Heliopolis wrote:I cant believe some of the comments here...Belgium is 'not much' better than the US...the difference between the two teams was Belgium had an 'extra sub'
One team dominated the match from start to finish. One team took like 20 shots on target. One team entered this match with 3 wins out of 3 and no goals conceded from open play. One team has players on the very top clubs in Europe. One team went to the other team's country last year and defeated them 4-2. Guess which team that is?
Belgium is head and shoulders above the US its not even funny. Belgium dominated the US more than it dominated any of its 3 group stage opponents.
Had it not been for poor finishing and Howard being amazing, the match could have very well ended 5-0.
BTW, Wilmots needs to be more careful with his subs. His midfield was exhausted in Extra Time yet he failed to recognize it. Fatigue at the end allowed the US to pressure Belgium the last 10 minutes of the match.
"Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free our minds!" - Bob Marley
Re: USA (1) v Belgium (2)
Not really the best comment. His thought here was that if Belgium had scored in the first half USA would have just folded its arms while Belgium would start pouring in goals? Yeah...that wouldn't even happen on Playstation. It is the height of opaks!!wale1974 wrote:Best comment from a neutral......nothing more to add.Heliopolis wrote:I cant believe some of the comments here...Belgium is 'not much' better than the US...the difference between the two teams was Belgium had an 'extra sub'
One team dominated the match from start to finish. One team took like 20 shots on target. One team entered this match with 3 wins out of 3 and no goals conceded from open play. One team has players on the very top clubs in Europe. One team went to the other team's country last year and defeated them 4-2. Guess which team that is?
Belgium is head and shoulders above the US its not even funny. Belgium dominated the US more than it dominated any of its 3 group stage opponents.
Had it not been for poor finishing and Howard being amazing, the match could have very well ended 5-0.
BTW, Wilmots needs to be more careful with his subs. His midfield was exhausted in Extra Time yet he failed to recognize it. Fatigue at the end allowed the US to pressure Belgium the last 10 minutes of the match.
DAK TO THE FUTURE...HOT BOYZ...DEM BOYZ...COWBOYZ!!
To be scientifically literate is to empower yourself to know when someone else is full of boolsheet!
Scientifically speaking: ANC Trophies = 3/4 when Br^33 = 0.
***Breda = Br****
To be scientifically literate is to empower yourself to know when someone else is full of boolsheet!
Scientifically speaking: ANC Trophies = 3/4 when Br^33 = 0.
***Breda = Br****
Re: USA (1) v Belgium (2)
kolinzo wrote:Not really the best comment. His thought here was that if Belgium had scored in the first half USA would have just folded its arms while Belgium would start pouring in goals? Yeah...that wouldn't even happen on Playstation. It is the height of opaks!!wale1974 wrote:Best comment from a neutral......nothing more to add.Heliopolis wrote:I cant believe some of the comments here...Belgium is 'not much' better than the US...the difference between the two teams was Belgium had an 'extra sub'
One team dominated the match from start to finish. One team took like 20 shots on target. One team entered this match with 3 wins out of 3 and no goals conceded from open play. One team has players on the very top clubs in Europe. One team went to the other team's country last year and defeated them 4-2. Guess which team that is?
Belgium is head and shoulders above the US its not even funny. Belgium dominated the US more than it dominated any of its 3 group stage opponents.
Had it not been for poor finishing and Howard being amazing, the match could have very well ended 5-0.
BTW, Wilmots needs to be more careful with his subs. His midfield was exhausted in Extra Time yet he failed to recognize it. Fatigue at the end allowed the US to pressure Belgium the last 10 minutes of the match.
Good point. In the dynamics of a game, if Belgium had scored, we've seen enough to suggest the USMNT would have fought to rally back....BUT with the way that particular game was going, it'd simply have meant more space and Tim Howard would have had to repel 50 shots instead of 30. The dynamics of each game are different but it was all too easy for Belgium, the USA didnt show any of the defensive solidity it'd shown in prior games....actually Belgium did what Ghana was unable to do in terms of testing the goalie and exploiting the holes that were there all day.
Belgium played their est game of the tournament and the USA played their worst. We can debate the ifs and buts all day, the facts tell a clear tale, Belgium should have won GOING AWAY.
Evans Bipi, had declared to the press, “Why must [Governor Amaechi] be insulting my mother, my Jesus Christ on earth?”
- The YeyeMan
- Eaglet
- Posts: 17889
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2003 12:51 am
Re: USA (1) v Belgium (2)
sinequanon wrote:I
IBU
IBULEVE
IBULEVE WILL KILL THE PAIN
IBULEVE WILL KILL THE PAIN
IBULEVE WILL KILL THE PAIN...
The annoying American dude sat in front of me was the one leading that chant. Credit to the US fans though, they really came in their numbers.
danfo driver quotes:
"Great! Now it begins." - Jan 25, 2024
-
Cellular quotes:
"The Yeyeman is hardly ever vulgar when dealing with anyone. " - Mar 23, 2018
"Thank God na oyibo be coach." - Nov 16, 2017
"I will take Trump over Clinton but I am in the minority." - Jul 19, 2016
© The YeyeMan 2024
This post is provided AS IS with no warranties and confers no rights.
It is not authorised by CyberEagles. You assume all risk for your use. All rights reserved.
"Great! Now it begins." - Jan 25, 2024
-
Cellular quotes:
"The Yeyeman is hardly ever vulgar when dealing with anyone. " - Mar 23, 2018
"Thank God na oyibo be coach." - Nov 16, 2017
"I will take Trump over Clinton but I am in the minority." - Jul 19, 2016
© The YeyeMan 2024
This post is provided AS IS with no warranties and confers no rights.
It is not authorised by CyberEagles. You assume all risk for your use. All rights reserved.